Neo
Well-Known Member
Ha ha.. no I was speaking of the crosses and statues.I agree with you on the intent, respect, and reverence required Neo. I don't personally call the Bible an artifact.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ha ha.. no I was speaking of the crosses and statues.I agree with you on the intent, respect, and reverence required Neo. I don't personally call the Bible an artifact.
unsafe - I didn't say that Scripture had changed. What I did say was that the way in which we interpret Scripture has changed - and it has done so many times. Now you suggest that there is only one correct interpretation to Scripture. Can you please identify just which one that is. Is it the literal interpretation? The historical-cultural interpretation? The analogical interpretation? The feminist theology interpretation? The min jung interpretation? I believe only God fully knows the true and full meaning of Scripture. This is because I believe God placed His knowledge into the minds of the Bible's human authors so that they might create the text.Pr.Jae your quote -----We've changed the way we interpret the Bible many times over the centuries unsafe
Show me any scripture that has changed in the Bible ---God's word is the same today as it was when God inspired what was to be written ---The Holy Spirit is the only one in my Bible that gives true meaning to scripture according to scripture ------The Words God gave are the same today as they were in the beginning they haven't changed -----
And this is your from your quote ---- Hermeneutics is ever in flux. -----
Hermeneutics was initially applied to the interpretation, or exegesis, of scripture. It emerged as a theory of human understanding in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries through the work ofFriedrich SchleiermacherandWilhelm Dilthey.[6]Modern hermeneutics includes both verbal and nonverbal communication as well assemiotics, presuppositions, and preunderstandings.
your human understanding can change but the Holy Spirit speaks truth and is the teacher of the true meaning to scripture in my Book ---and I follow God and His Book that has never changed ------Human interpretation or understanding will always be changing ----
This is what I believe ---- you can believe what you like -----The Holy Spirit does not keep changing the Interpretation of scripture --we humans do that by trying man made methods in my opinion ---
dependence upon the HOLY SPIRIT: -----Scripture tells us that we are to rely on the Holy Spirit's illumination to gain insights into the meaning and application of Scripture (John 16:12-15, 1 Corinthians 2:9-11). It is the Holy Spirit's work to throw light upon the Word of God so that the believer can assent to the meaning intended and act on it. The Holy Spirit, as the"Spirit of truth"(John 16:13), guides us so that"we may understand what God has freely given us"(1 Corinthians 2:12). This is quite logical: full comprehension of the Word of God is impossible without prayerful dependence on the Spirit of God, for He who inspired the Word (2 Peter 1:21) is also its supreme interpreter.
Ha ha.. no I was speaking of the crosses and statues.
Neo said:So if faith is our trust and confidence in the unknown, what are our "works"?
Neo said:Are they in our control, at any level?
Neo said:Or are they predestined, like some church dogmas say?
Neo said:To me, our works can be found in everything we do, in our family life, our social life, our work life, and mostly importantly in our personal lives - if we are not honest with ourselves then what are we?
Neo said:I also believe that the focus on our works should be more on the "how" we approach life and not solely on the "what" we do in our lives. Without an intelligent and loving "intent" moving us forward in our works, then the "what" is becomes an empty shell. If we focus more on the "how" then the "what" takes care of itself, i.e. it begins to automatically reflect the divine principles as they are creations that originate from within.
Neo said:By only having faith that God will somehow pick up His divine, and predestined -insert religion here- children while leaving the rest (and presumably most) of humanity to be like discarded seeds scattered to the wind, is to me an absurd way of thinking.
Neo said:This, therefore, is the "goal" of works, to align our little will with the greater Will, the Soul of our soul. By definition this alignment process unites one into all and all into One.
Neo said:So hiw do we align our personal wills with that of an unseen Divine Will?
Neo said:It's a simple formula
Neo said:Through such approaches to life we will eventually discover that religions, doctrines and dogmas are not the sole determiners in our salvation. They are rather just the means to the end, like ladders to a roof.
airclean33 said:Wow John , this seems a bit harsh.
airclean33 said:You seem to say here that this is no more, than wishful fulfillment.
No, faith is not necessarily just "faith in the unknown". But for many, many people, their spiritual journey started out of such things as fear, ignorance, guilt, desperation, etc. For those then blind faith was indeed their starting point. Blessed are those whose journey has started from direct experience.Neo said:So if faith is our trust and confidence in the unknown, what are our "works"?
RevJohn said:Faith is not necessarily our trust and confidence in the unknown. That would be a blind faith would it not? I believe in something though I know not what it is, what it does nor what it requires. Not too vague is it?
I believe faith requires something to be known in order for trust to be part of that relationship.
By curse vs reward I assume you taking about the laws of Karma. These laws are very real in the physical world but also appear to apply to our mental world too. This law was described by Jesus with the words: "as we sow, so do we reap". The laws of Karma can be overridden, however, as is evidenced by the stories of miraculous healings by figures such as the Christ and Sri Krishna.Neo said:Are they in our control, at any level?
RevJohn said:If the universe is one of curse and/or reward then yes our works are in control. Good works lead to good rewards and bad works lead to curses.
Of course if works are not in control it wouldn't be unusual for bad works to bring rewards and good works to result in curses.
I don't see much difference between these two words John, I think you're talking semantics here.Neo said:Or are they predestined, like some church dogmas say?
RevJohn said:Works are not predestined. They would be predetermined.
Those works should rather reflect our beliefs and not betray them.Neo said:To me, our works can be found in everything we do, in our family life, our social life, our work life, and mostly importantly in our personal lives - if we are not honest with ourselves then what are we?
RevJohn said:That is as good as any definition of works. What do those works betray of our beliefs?
Again, these are word games re the paved road to hell. The definition of intent could be good or bad depending on one's integrity, intelligence and honestly.Neo said:I also believe that the focus on our works should be more on the "how" we approach life and not solely on the "what" we do in our lives. Without an intelligent and loving "intent" moving us forward in our works, then the "what" is becomes an empty shell. If we focus more on the "how" then the "what" takes care of itself, i.e. it begins to automatically reflect the divine principles as they are creations that originate from within.
RevJohn said:So the good intent is more important than the fact that it paves the road to hell?
No, no, no.. it is up to us to dance with the tune of the Universe, and not against it or by creating that tune. And we cannot make ourselves bigger than God, but we can only become at-one with God. There is a huge difference.Neo said:By only having faith that God will somehow pick up His divine, and predestined -insert religion here- children while leaving the rest (and presumably most) of humanity to be like discarded seeds scattered to the wind, is to me an absurd way of thinking.
RevJohn said:Well that is the works ideology in a nutshell. God dances to our tune. If we do the right things the right way God is obligated to us. In that case predestination and predetermination play no role. We are talking instead about self-destination and self-determination. We make ourselves bigger than God.
Of course there is another ideology possible. And that is the notion that God has chosen us and what is not lacking is a response shaped by our gratitude for God's grace.
When Christ said "Thy will Father, not mine", I don't think He was trying to "dominate" God's will.Neo said:This, therefore, is the "goal" of works, to align our little will with the greater Will, the Soul of our soul. By definition this alignment process unites one into all and all into One.
RevJohn said:I believe that you have it backwards. Where our works are the deciding factor it isn't so much that our little wills must conform to the greater will it is that our wills must dominate God's will. We are rewarded because God has no choice but to reward the good works we have done.
Neo said:So how do we align our personal wills with that of an unseen Divine Will?
RevJohn said:We don't. We shape that unseen will after our own and we attribute divinity to it because we think of ourselves far higher than is warranted.
The simple formula I spoke of is to "perfect" the vehicles given to us, i.e. our body, mind and spirit. And we do so by watching, and to some degree, by controlling our actions, our thoughts and our speech. These are simple things that all of us can do, regardless of our religion or non-religion.Neo said:It's a simple formula
RevJohn said:This is quite the tell don't you think. A formula is something we manipulate or manifest. It is all about our will and more to the point, our will over things we deem have no will of their own.
Any system that puts the lower self ahead of the greater Self, the Christ Consciousness within is in my opinion destined to fail.Neo said:Through such approaches to life we will eventually discover that religions, doctrines and dogmas are not the sole determiners in our salvation. They are rather just the means to the end, like ladders to a roof.
RevJohn said:Without a doubt there are those who look upon doctrine and dogmas as secret formulas to get what is wanted. This is a key component to prosperity thinking, the secrets we can use to put God at our bidding.
I'm not convinced that such systems are anything more than wish fulfillment and the only folk who profit from them are the folk who understand how to run a pyramid schemes.
Justification Is a gift from God - and comes from God Himself. It Is So Much Greater than a voluntary giving of the self.airclean33 ---Great Video ---love it ---thanks for posting it ----
your quote ----Serander All.Then Self becomes one with Jesus------
Amen Brother
Hi Neo---This is your post.
Any system that puts the lower self ahead of the greater Self, the Christ Consciousness within is in my opinion destined to fail.
.QUOTE--Airclean
Perhaps this may help you understand The born again walk.
Serander All.Then Self becomes one with Jesus
Neo said,,,,,
Any system that puts the lower self ahead of the greater Self, the Christ Consciousness within is in my opinion destined to fail.
What's important blackbelt is God's continually gifting us of His grace. We need to be giving Him all the credit, holding back none of it for ourselves as if we do anything meritorious.Amen Aircleen ,
The vision and understanding of Christ on the Cross, helps us daily surrender our ego as Jesus surrendered His Life for us
What's important blackbelt is God's continually gifting us of His grace. We need to be giving Him all the credit, holding back none of it for ourselves as if we do anything meritorious.
This is my view on justification and surrender -----
Justification is being in right standing with God ---in order to be justified you have to have accepted Christ ----and you are so right it is a free gift after being Born Again ------
unsafe said:KJV Dictionary Definition: justification
unsafe said:
justification ----In theology, remission of sin and absolution from guilt and punishment; or an act of free grace by which God pardons the sinner and accepts him as righteous, on account of the atonement of Christ.
- to declare, pronounce, one to be just, righteous, or such as he ought to be
http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G1344&t=KJV
unsafe said:Surrender
unsafe said:is the first step to becoming a born again person in my opinion and takes work on our part ------God is always tugging on us to come to Him we have to surrender to that calling ---- we can surrender to acceptance or not -----most people accept under a crisis situation in my experience ----I do not believe like some that God chooses certain people to be saved ---I believe He chooses certain people to do certain Works for His Glory but I personally believe all can be saved if they want to be ------
unsafe said:Surrender
unsafe said:The first step (the root) is surrender. To surrender means to relinquish possession or control to another, to submit to the power, authority, and control of another....
unsafe said:....After becoming Born Again -----the surrender never stops ---if we want to mature in our walk and become Christ like -----
Neo said:But for many, many people, their spiritual journey started out of such things as fear, ignorance, guilt, desperation, etc. For those then blind faith was indeed their starting point. Blessed are those whose journey has started from direct experience.
Neo said:By curse vs reward I assume you taking about the laws of Karma.
Neo said:These laws are very real in the physical world but also appear to apply to our mental world too. This law was described by Jesus with the words: "as we sow, so do we reap".
Neo said:The laws of Karma can be overridden, however, as is evidenced by the stories of miraculous healings by figures such as the Christ and Sri Krishna.
Neo said:I don't see much difference between these two words John, I think you're talking semantics here.
Neo said:Those works should rather reflect our beliefs and not betray them.
Neo said:Again, these are word games re the paved road to hell. The definition of intent could be good or bad depending on one's integrity, intelligence and honestly.
Neo said:No, no, no.. it is up to us to dance with the tune of the Universe, and not against it or by creating that tune. And we cannot make ourselves bigger than God, but we can only become at-one with God. There is a huge difference.
Neo said:Imagine a deep pool of water on the top of a mountain. By stilling our desires, our thoughts and our actions we still the waters of our Being and we begin to reflect the Universe above us. We become "at one" and vibrationally "synchronized", thus allowing the Universe to work through us. In this way we sacrifice our lower needs for the greater to work through us. This is the law of Service.
Neo said:This type of control is within our means. Are we destined and predetermined to do so with our lives? Yes, I believe so, eventually. Evolution is ever pushing us forward to expand our awareness and become at-one with our surroundings.
Neo said:When Christ said "Thy will Father, not mine", I don't think He was trying to "dominate" God's will.
Neo said:The simple formula I spoke of is to "perfect" the vehicles given to us, i.e. our body, mind and spirit. And we do so by watching, and to some degree, by controlling our actions, our thoughts and our speech. These are simple things that all of us can do, regardless of our religion or non-religion.