Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Local or federal?I finally got to someone in government about the COVID at home treatments. Fingers crossed this actually goes somewhere.
Provincial. I took a look at the BC criteria, it's more inclusive. I hope Alberta expands to that. AB made it all about using some type of systemic immunosuppressant, they ignored health conditions in general.Local or federal?
Meanwhile Kenny is proposing cuts to pharmacists, respiratory therapists, SLPs, etc. shortly before his leadership review. You know all those professions with a lot of added pressures with COVID. He's doing an excellent job of pissing off many.Nancy, when you're planning your winter walking style around ice, think like a penguin. Feet a bit out, body really centred on its core, feels a little bit forward. Also, ski poles, walking sticks, cane.
COVID regulations have devolved into a political cluster-f**k, and I'm sick of it. DoFo thinks he'll win the election on "no plate fees - $10 a month to buy my vote?" and "dumps all COVID protection mandates" (well, I do hope, Doug, that there's a single nurse left standing at the end of your mis-handling of this situation). And yeah, in Ontario, pretty well the only people eligible for a "full" booster shot were those who take immuno-suppressants (even topical).
"Eligible"??? What, is Ontario communistan or something? "By each according to their needs?"And yeah, in Ontario, pretty well the only people eligible for a "full" booster shot were those who take immuno-suppressants (even topical).
I think all provinces have separate criteria. In AB that criteria is very similar to BC's criteria for at home COVID treatments."Eligible"??? What, is Ontario communistan or something? "By each according to their needs?"
Can't people just get a booster?
Wow, that seems so screwed up?
Oh oh thank youNo, no, it's a medical recommendation. People who have had two vaccines, should, evidentially, have a booster shot which is a "half dose" (which experimentally provides better protection against infection). If you are on an immuno-suppressant drug (orally, or topically, apparently, in my health unit), you should get a full-dose booster. It's the very best of infection control. I am super proud of our Health Unit.
BUT, it really didn't fine tune into rare diseases, either. Caught me (not rare disease) but would not catch Chemgal.
Thank you :3I think all provinces have separate criteria. In AB that criteria is very similar to BC's criteria for at home COVID treatments.
AB actually seems to have easier criteria to get the full dose booster/3 doses for primary series of vaccine, whereas BC has a wider range of criteria to get treatment for COVID when not needing hospital treatment. I'm not sure of all the other various criteria in the other provinces. BC and AB at least make there's relatively easy to find online.
Sorry, yes, I tend to just lump them together when topical. Protopic isn't listed as an example with the brands. I wasn't reading through all of it though, was just trying to figure out what's going on for Paxlovid/Sotrovimab eligibility there in case I need to keep pushing here. I know of people who would be worse off immunocompromised than me who had covid and couldn't access it, it's gross.Not topical steroids, but topical immune suppressants.
Protopic isn't listed as an example with the brands.
Just to add in an extra layer of confusion.It is on the Ontario list. Or, more specifically, on my health unit's list,
Not that I meant you. I'm just surprised there couldn't be decent decisions made nation-wide regarding things like priority. With different populations timeframes may still vary but there really should be better data regarding things like risk factors.Just to add in an extra layer of confusion.