Crazyheart,I remember when we first met on the original WC, we talked about our similar experiences being bullied and forced out. Yes, it still hurts. Fortunately I found another congregation, where I am now, and my gifts and contributions were appreciated.
I agree with you that sometimes changes have to be done slowly to avoid annoying (or hurting) people - and to make sure that they are right for the congregation. My church is quietly and at a snail's pace modifying our Remembrance Sunday observations. I think it will take the death of our last WW2 veteran before they fade away.
By the way, I've been asked for the first time to lead worship in my home church. Both our ministers will be away for separate reasons, and despite the fact that we have about a dozen retired clergy in our congregation, I've been invited. It will be the largest church where I've lead the service - going from little country churches with a couple of dozen worshipers to one with 150 +. I'm invited for Peace Sunday - Oct. 22nd. I don't think I would have accepted if it were Remembrance. I can do 'peace'. I hope.
You're absolutely right that people shouldn't be bullied. But change also can't be delayed out of fear that not everybody's "ready" for it.
When I interned, my supervisor (a very experienced minister and former Personnel Minister who had done his share of working with congregations and ministers in conflict) told me that what I would hear most frequently is that you have to wait until you've been at a congregation for at least five years before you've built up enough trust to make changes. He disagreed. He said that changes have to be made in the first year or two of a new ministry. People know there's a new minister; they know that not everything will be the same and they know there will be changes. They're prepared for that, at least subconsciously. But if you wait longer than that you run the risk of settling in to the "familiar" yourself, so that nothing of substance ever really changes. Having followed up a few years ago with a doctorate that dealt at least in part with churches experiencing conflict, I tend to agree that change needs to happen sooner rather than later in a new ministry.
Having said that - it should never be "bullied" or "forced." The congregation and its leaders need a chance to decide whether it works. That's why we have elders - except, of course, that most elders in the United Church have little concept of what eldership is all about, but that's a discussion for a different place.
I'll go back to my experience of introducing healing prayer and anointing in my last church. I simply decided to do it. I didn't ask for permission. I understood the dynamic of congregations. If you ask for permission - it will have to be discussed, and studied, and we'll seek feedback, and somebody "important" won't like it, and we can't upset that "important" person, so we won't make the change, etc., etc. So I just did it. But then - having done it - I took it back to the Worship Committee.
Had I gone to the Worship Committee before even trying it, it probably wouldn't have happened - because they'd have been uncomfortable with it. They'd have said, "it's not our style." At the very least it probably would have taken ten years of consultation and education and preparation before it could have been done. But after introducing it in a service, I asked them about it. What did they think? How did it feel? Well, 20 people had come forward at that service. (If I had announced a special healing service on a Saturday night, or a gathering in the chapel after Sunday service I doubt that 20 would have come - but because I did it at the end of the regular Sunday service, inviting people who were already there to come forward during the closing hymn, they came.) And that was a significant chunk (about 15% of attenders on that Sunday) who had come forward, thus expressing that this met a need for them. The roof hadn't collapsed. God hadn't sent a lightning bolt. NO ONE QUIT! It was really different and maybe uncomfortable for some - but - wow - it was OK. They could have said that 85% of the congregation obviously wasn't interested and might be uncomfortable with it so we should stop it. Instead, they showed spiritual maturity (like the man I mentioned who spoke to me) by acknowledging that they had to pay less attention to the 85% who didn't take part to meet the expressed need of the 15% who did take part. I'm not sure I was ever prouder of a church committee than I was of that Worship Committee when they made that decision.
My advice - never wait for people to be "onside" before you try something new. Try it once or twice - then ask people to evaluate it having seen it. If they're still unalterably opposed, then you can't keep pushing it, but actually trying it is the only way you're going to be sure if there's a need for it among the congregation.