Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the fall was predestined, with Christ as the backup plan? But first, of course, God had to make a deal with the devil and sacrifice is his one and only son as a ransom for the Soul of Humanity. It all makes perfect sense now.I'm sure God did , thus we have Christ for that reason
It does if judgement exist remember God wears all hats he's the ultimateSo the fall was predestined, with Christ as the backup plan? But first, of course, God had to make a deal with the devil and sacrifice is his one and only son as a ransom for the Soul of Humanity. It all makes perfect sense now.
Neo ------your quote ----But I still don't see any justice or love in letting so many of "His children" be born into such a sad state when "we" are born with so much opportunity. We are, after all, taking about one kick at the cat, so to speak, for an eternity free from the hell and torture for those post 13 year olds who grew up never "finding" or even looking for Jesus. What would they care in a world that gave them nothing. Must be one those paradoxes I guess.
So let me get this straight.. God gives man complete control over the earth. Man, however, makes huge mistakes on the way and the poor begin to suffer. Now since there is only "one chance" at redemption, and one chance only, then the eternal fate of the destitute and the war ravaged and the abused of this world, all sits on the shoulders of Man. So while we in the west enjoy our life, praising God and looking forward to a great eternity, the ones who never had a chance at "finding Jesus" will suffer for all of eternity because we messed things up... I'm sorry, I'm still not feeling the love and particularly the justice that God should've given to those who never had a chance.God gave man complete control over this earth Neo ----it is the parents responsibility is to school the child on God -----no one has any excuse about not knowing God ----Man screwed up not God ----your blaming the wrong person Neo -----but even as you blame God His love is there for you --- you are the one rejecting Him ---He is always there for His Creation ---we have turn our backs on Him -----God has been taken out of our schools ---homes ---churches---businesses ----we humans took God out -----and the world is in a mess ----
--That's Kind of funny Chansen .I believe you, AC. I believe the Holy Spirit given you the "why", and I think the Holy Spirit has given me the "how".
What we need now, are a lot of bats.
If you are born into a Muslim or a Hindu or a Christian family then you are most likely going to be a Muslim, a Hindu, or a Christian.Hi Neo were in the world would you say , Christ Jesus has not been Preached?
--Neo first read John 3:16-21If you are born into a Muslim or a Hindu or a Christian family then you are most likely going to be a Muslim, a Hindu, or a Christian.
If you are born into a poverty stricken country then you are most likely to go with what ever religion that would feed you.
We in the west feel so smug about saying that the missionaries have spread the word of Jesus to everyone, all around the world, (which they haven't), but the reality is that these missioanries are more than likely going to be met with suspicion, since they are preaching into a culture that is not theirs.
To make the claim that one "must accept Jesus" in order to be saved is an arrogant and an ignorant claim. Christ never said this. I know his words have been "interpreted" as if he said this, but that's just an interpretation, also known as doctrine.
How different airclean, would that sound to you if Jesus had said "I am a way, and a truth and a life; you can come to Abba Godde via my teachings"?
Given we've got no video evidence, and we have to assume that this is some sort of recreated memory, do you remember participles when you memorize stuff? I don't (my memory goes: way, truth, life, come to Abba Godde) and I have a really good memory - this morning I told my guy about a dream I had 53 years ago.
Maybe that's perfectly clear to you, but that's not perfectly clear to me.
And Jesus' (purported) words are not the Jewish holy scriptures. Their canon was closed prior to Jesus' life. The New Testament was written, in Greek, by people who were not necessarily Jewish, in a period of some 30 to 75 years after Jesus' death. And Holy Scriptures are not written as a factual account, but as a theological statement. You can say that the early church government had some strong beliefs, but I don't think you've got any evidence as to Jesus' thoughts. No video camera, remember?
And again, what does the repetition of more verses with the same translation pattern mean? A true vine, a good shepherd. And John is the latest written of the gospels, and the most dedicated to developing a "Christology".
Of course I'm speculating. So are you.
On the meaning of words written down in a language neither of us understands, all of which have been translated into English (never mind other languages) more than a hundred times, and used to justify everything from compulsory celibacy to murder. So yeah, we're speculating.
Neo --your quote -----So the fall was predestined, with Christ as the backup plan?
In all your getting get understanding Neo -----
No --No Neo Christ was always the plan from the beginning ----Christ was never the backup plan ------Christ was the 1st plan and is the last plan --Period
actually no im not, Im standing on what it actually says , and there are eight I AM's that support my claim and zero to support yours
your wrong again, there is only ONE iteration that goes from the original Greek to the English, One, then from the English you have translations and transliterations.
Of the remaining differences, virtually all scholars agree that our current New Testament is 99.5% text pure and of the .5% ,none affects any significant doctrine, the eight " I AMs" is significant Doctrine also held up through tradition of Church.
This issue is not even contested by non-Christian scholars because if we reject the authenticity of the New Testament on textual grounds we'd have to reject every ancient work of antiquity and declare null and void every piece of historical information from written sources prior to the beginning of the second millennium A.D.
you have no bases