TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Oh, the creation of ISIS. That really goes back to before ISIS, itself. During the Russian invasion of Afghanistan about 1990, the CIA moved in to create a Jihadist movement to fight the Russians. The first major part of it was al Quaeda. over the years, related groups developed from that - including ISIS. In fact, both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia have financed and supplied ISIS to attack Assad. The reason the Russia joined in was to mess that plan.
The west has been killing arabs for a century to get control of oil. Jihadism has been a quite natural response to that. The tipping point was the US/British invasion of Iraq. Nobody loved Saddam Hussein. But they also knew that this was yet another war on Muslims to steal their oil. Thus the rapid growth of Jihadism.
And, if you check the British press, you will note it has been proven that both Bush and Blair lied about the reason for that war. There was no legal justification for it. but a million Muslims were murdered., anyway. So who can be surprised at the rise of Islam?
 
And you don't believe that invading Iraq and murdering a million people would cause a refugee crisis. And you think american billionaires would be too stupid to know that? I don't know. Maybe they are.
 
They may not have been thinking about that. But I don't think they sought to create the situation the world's now in.

Anyway, I really don't know. I'm just an ill informed armchair pundit. I don't know what goes on at the top behind closed doors, or with military strategy, nor does anyone who's not in top positions. The average person can only guess. Situations come up in the world and we're not privy to what directly preceded them in most cases - we just see/ read it as it's happening and being reported and try put the pieces together to analyze later. What do we really know about all the cogs in the wheel?



As for Trump...we can see his behaviour plainly...that's enough to realize he'd be a disaster ... it's sort of darkly humorous entertainment. Never a dull moment - yet, the reality of a Trump presidency would be horrible. It looks like he's really losing, though. I echo Jon Oliver who said, "I can't wait for this crazy election to be over, but at the same time I'll kind of miss him (Trump)."
 
Last edited:
As far as I can tell - Trump's only strategy is to stay in the game as long as he can and either come out ahead or break even. He's gambling. He's bluffing and card counting.

I don't think he has any substantial policy of any kind in mind, except, inflame and deflect. As long as attention stays on him - even while he criticizes the media for not focusing on Clinton - he's the one providing the distractions! He makes it up as he goes along.

If he doesn't think he's going to win he'll drop out and blame his loss on the media. He'll try to use this 'survey' that he recently sent out to his supporters only (gee, not biased at all - and the questions are all designed to get a Trumpian response), as 'proof' that America thinks he's great and the media and biased polls are misrepresenting what people really think of him. All the while, whether he wins or loses he's completely messed with the GOP, and gained himself a rabid fan club - who he will use for his next scheme, somehow. Life is a show to him, he's the star and he is enjoying this. He plays the "long con". It goes outside the bounds of even the dirtiest politics, which is predictable to an extent - but there's no precedent in history for this behaviour in a campaign - so, unfortunately he's right that the pundits, in thinking and analyzing, how they usually do, can't figure him out. He's a wildly narcissistic TV ratings man and he's working this game like a reality show illusion.

Watching this unfold is like watching a David Mamet movie. Maybe Trump knows that, too.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_trick
 
Last edited:
Are the Arabs eliminating their trouble ... or their virtue-like assets if they could see what was actually good for the pragmatic self ... a poorly understood item considering peoples tendency to decide too quickly ... tres vite .. from the Franc, or Gael, or a fast moving etiology when observed across time?

Few can imagine it ... as time machinations are out ... they just don't grind well!
 
As far as I can tell - Trump's only strategy is to stay in the game as long as he can and either come out ahead or break even. He's gambling. He's bluffing and card counting.

I don't think he has any substantial policy of any kind in mind, except, inflame and deflect. As long as attention stays on him - even while he criticizes the media for not focusing on Clinton - he's the one providing the distractions! He makes it up as he goes along.

If he doesn't think he's going to win he'll drop out and blame his loss on the media. He'll try to use this 'survey' that he recently sent out to his supporters only (gee, not biased at all - and the questions are all designed to get a Trumpian response), as 'proof' that America thinks he's great and the media and biased polls are misrepresenting what people really think of him. All the while, whether he wins or loses he's completely messed with the GOP, and gained himself a rabid fan club - who he will use for his next scheme, somehow. Life is a show to him, he's the star and he is enjoying this. He plays the "long con". It goes outside the bounds of even the dirtiest politics, which is predictable to an extent - but there's no precedent in history for this behaviour in a campaign - so, unfortunately he's right that the pundits, in thinking and analyzing, how they usually do, can't figure him out. He's a wildly narcissistic TV ratings man and he's working this game like a reality show illusion.

Watching this unfold is like watching a David Mamet movie. Maybe Trump knows that, too.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_trick


He's just trying to invade the privy aria ... to gain some additional benefit from interference there ... more than the present sacred bunch ... having arrived over time as hosts ...
 
Although we are being inundated with a variety of social engineering tactics, these techniques are easy to spot once you know the agenda is to foment opponents, threats and enemies. Part of the job of seeing through the fear propaganda and social engineering is to reverse its impact by integrating and finding commonality among the polarized groups and viewpoints – and as always digging deeper to investigate the force behind it all. Thanks @Graeme Decarie, for all your digging!
 
None of all the above matters. For many years now, western democracy has come under the control of big money. The politicians really don't matter much. That's why Obama's foreign policy was so very similar to that of Bush. And there are no limits to what big money will ask for - and get. Their is no limit to the death and misery it will be willing ot impose on the whole world.
In the U.S. it can get so much money diverted to itself and can avoid taxes so readily, that the level of poverty is rising to make the rich richer.
Hillary has been very much part of that. If Trump isn't, he'll be assassinated. Who Americans vote for doesn't matter.
The system is broken. It's not coming back.
The only question now is about the reaction of American society. Americans have been so heavily propagandized over the years that they are capable now of just two reactions - One is hand over heart patriotism. The other is the mindless rage that Trump has been working on.
If Trump wins, he really has no cure to the rage he would win on. If Hillary wins, the rage will still be there, too. And she has no answer
The American dream, always overblown, is now largely gone. Neither Trump nor Hillary will bring it back. So the only question left is what form the rage will take.
And what will the churches do? As usual, they will pretend that none of this is happening.
 
If the rage takes over (in the populus), it'll be those peoples' own undoing. I have faith that the majority of American public knows better. One might be able to understand some of the reasons, apart from racism and sexism driving Trump supporters' ire...such as the economy...that people feel angry about. But that they've chosen Trump as their respresentitive is completely misguided. And he's tapped into the ugliest aspects of peoples' nature in challenging his opponent (and Hillary has not, so points for her on that). It makes sense that even rational, not overly emotional people, average Democrats, have a hard time trusting Clinton because of her history. By the same token, why some reasonable, thinking, Republicans will support her.

The thing is...Hillary is not crazy. She may have an inflated ego (one probably has to, to even want the job) but she is not so emotionally unregulated. I don't use the word crazy to describe someone with a mental illness who is aware of their own limitations - but Trump's behaviour, almost daily, is dangerously batshit. He knows no limitations...boundaries are not in his lexicon. And the media has a responsibility to call attention to this...it's not media bias, it's legitimately sounding the alarm and they should've done it before he became a serious candidate. It was obvious from the beginning.
 
Last edited:
Because Clinton hasn't generated a fan club that will go to rallies that look like the Hunger Games or a bull-fight, or a zombie apocalypse - doesn't mean she's losing. Who knows how many are at those rallies for entertainment (is it free admission? Happening in your town? Why not.) and will not actually seriously vote for Trump, if they even show up to vote. I feel sorry for those who have been pulled in by the strange mix of anger and euphoria that is being generated - it's a gross spectacle - but I believe right now there is a majority, who may not be getting feverishly hyped up for Hillary, but will still vote for her.
 
Last edited:
good article about the press. But not entirely honest. It overlooks the role of the ownership of the press. Almost all news media in North America are owned by a handful of billionaires. Their reporting is almost always lying. It always has been. And there is almost no free press anywhere in the world.
Hillary doesn't have to attack Trump personally. The news media do it for her.
There is probably, I agree, a majority for Hillary. That means nothing because they are for her only because Trump seems worse.
Hillary is not crazy. She's greedy without limit. She's a mass murderer. She's a servant of the very rich. But she's not crazy. Neither was Stalin.
As for Assange, the documents he's releasing are government documents. Nobody has even claimed they are fake.
You offer three possible motives he might have. But you don't give the slightest evidence he has any of them.
Anyway, not to worry.
If Trump wins and doesn't take orders from the very wealthy, he'll be assassinated. That won't bother any conscience among the very wealthy. They have happily killed millions to get what they want.
And no matter which person wins, neither has anything resembling a plan to ease the rage in the U.S.
The system is broken. It's not a matter of personalities. The system itself is finished. I don't know where that takes us. By first guess would be fascism - which, for all practical purposes is what Hillary stands for - as did Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush again and, for that matter, Trump.
It does not make the slightest difference who americans vote for. It's over.
 
In Honor of Elvis Presley who died on August 16, 1977:
  • Who (I am not among them) some Conspiracy Theorists speculate is not really dead.
In Honor of my Grandson who was Born on August 16, 2002:
  • Who (without malice) at the now tender age of 14 introduces me as a Conspiracy Theorist to his friends.
In Honor of Donald Trump the Crisis Actor on August 16, 2016:
  • Who some people speculate may be "A Conspiracy to End All Conspiracy Theories"

With each passing day the 2016 presidential campaign looks more and more like an angry subreddit moderated by a genetically engineered “double-y chromosome” man-child constructed from the DNA of David Icke and Alex Jones.

Although it’s easy to dismiss this long, strange electoral trip as a passing political malady rising from America’s fever swamps, there are plenty of good reasons to get into the tin foil millinery business.

For a start, the main contest pits a Republican “Birther” who is allegedly popular with “Truthers” running against a notorious Democratic triangulator who many inside her own party believe not only jury-rigged the primaries, but also won with help from her conniving cronies in the mainstream media.

On the other side, the indefatigable Alex Jones is Donald Trump’s loudest and most confrontational alt-media megaphone. The matchmaker behind Alex and Donald’s brash bromance is “on-again/off-again” Trump confidant and all-around dirty trickster Roger Stone. Stone is now a fixture on Jones’s Infowars. Together they form a Trumpian tag-team ever-ready to body-slam any globalist who gets in Donald’s way. And they’re selling a few t-shirts, too.

Meanwhile, a former acting CIA Director pegged Trump as an “unwitting” stooge of a power-hungry former KGB agent (codename “Putin”) who, if you believe the Cold War rebooters, runs Russia like he’s a cat-stroking Bond villain. Apparently, Putin desperately needs to place a stooge in the White House to achieve his plans for world domination.

Then again, others wonder if Putin’s stooge is, in fact, actually a Manchurian candidate surreptitiously paving the way for Hillary Clinton’s ultimate victory. That plot was supposedly triggered by the husband (codename “Bubba”) of the Manchurian Candidate’s opponent (Agent HRC) during a “friendly” phone call just weeks before Trump began his political suicide mission to blow up the GOP.

What we know for certain is that since securing the nomination Trump has self-destructed like an orange-hued Mission Impossible tape. Are his jaw-dropping “mistakes” merely the execution of a sinister plot to elect an otherwise unelectable candidate? And does this plot bring us closer to the alien lizard apocalypse?

Well, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair has long lobbied the government to finally open its vault and reveal what it knows about extra-terrestrial visitors to planet Earth — a wish that Hillary says she’ll grant if elected. So, cue the Twilight Zone music and maybe we’ll find out.

And, in the latest plot thickening development, an actual former CIA “Operations Officer” named Evan McMullin threw his hat (and his trenchcoat) into the crowded presidential ring. Doesn’t it just stand to reason that #NeverTrumpsters would promote an unknown Mormon spook who used to pick out people for rendition or assassination and, amazingly enough, who also once worked as a Goldman “sacks of cash” collector?

Frankly, Mr. McMullin’s “stage right”— or “staged” by the right — entrance fits perfectly into an election year narrative that could be written like a ransom note with letters cut out of Hillary Clinton’s missing emails.

And if all of this doesn’t have you reaching for a shiny hat to protect your aching head, then consider how the cognitive dissonance of these narratives and counter-narratives might be making this election something more than an exercise in futility or a mere choice between two competing evils.

That’s because the real story of this election is how the media’s regurgitative approach to journalism serves up all of Trump’s poorly digested red herrings to a truth-starved population. Trump croaks out cranky tropes like an alt-right toad, and the cable newscyclers eat it up and spit it back out again.

It’s the logical outcome of their profitable fixation on a man who’s made more baseless claims than a professional auto accident insurance scammer. And the rubbernecking media obsessively obliged him while also paving his path to the nomination with an unprecedented supply of “free” media coverage.

But now that obsession is transforming this election into a referendum on sneaking suspicions, conspiracy theories, and the strange epithet of “trutherism.” The term “truther” is usually applied to anyone who refuses to buy the official story of 9/11. But “truther” is kinda strange because it turns the word “truth” into a term of derision and disdain. It’s the type of disdain that’s long been reserved for the CIA-generated phrase “Conspiracy Theory.”

“Conspiracy Theory” was the CIA’s response to growing doubts about the Warren Commission’s lone-nut, magic bullet, “move along, there’s nothing to see here” spin on the public execution of President John. F. Kennedy. Stoked by lawyer Mark Lane’s landmark book Rush to Judgment (1966) and by the increasingly high-profile investigation of New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, the CIA desperately needed a counter-conspiracy strategy to fight the public’s growing doubts.

What they got was a masterpiece of disinformation.

The counter-narrative approach was outlined in “CIA Document #1035-960.” The stated aim of the memo was “to provide material countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists.” And that it did. Most importantly, they married the words “theorist” and “theory” to “conspiracy.” By performing that simple semantic trick they weaponized “doubt” and turned it back on the doubters.

And it succeeded beyond Langley’s wildest dreams.

Not only did it generate doubt about the copious evidence compiled by Garrison (who the New York Times dismissively labeled a “theorist” in the headline of his 1992 obituary). And not only did it give sheepish journalists an easy way out of asking hard questions about the assassination. But it also cut off inquiry into just about anything that needed to be tidied-up with an “official story.”

From the Gulf of Tonkin Incident to the October Surprise to CIA cocaine trafficking to the public executions of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy and dozens of other evidence-laden “conspiracies,” the “conspiracy theory” label became a one-size fits all solution to the problem of public doubt about official cover-ups, illegal wars, and political corruption.

And now — in this era of mortal doubts about politics, endless war, banking hijinx, media manipulation, and even the “American Dream”— we suddenly find ourselves drowning in a sea of conspiracy theories.

As of the writing of this story, you can put “Trump Conspiracy Theory” into the Google machine and it’ll spit out “About 30,600 results.” But that’s just the tip of the iceberg (which, according to Trump, isn’t really melting because global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the wily Chinese). If you click on “More news for ‘Trump Conspiracy Theory’” you’ll get 1,930 results just in the “recent news” category!

Among the mountain of stories filed by hundreds of news sources, the GOP’s profligate nominee has inserted “conspiracy theory” directly into the headlines of stories about Orlando Massacre, the outcome of the forthcoming election, the founding of ISIS, the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Syrian refugees, and dozens upon dozens more. When it comes to spouting disinformation, Trump is a psychological warrior’s dream come true.

Strangely enough, the only theory he’s avoided talking about is the Birther movement he helped to create. Then again, Trump implies that Obama’s true allegiance is to Muslim terrorists for whom, the assertion goes, he’s working for as a secret agent inside the White House. Maybe that’s where Putin got the idea?

Trump did ratchet-up the cognitive dissonance when he threw the Kennedy Assassination into the swirling mix of tropes clogging up this campaign. Amazingly, Trump not only got away with peddling the National Enquirer’s flaccid, evidence-free “conspiracy theory” about Senator Ted Cruz’s father’s alleged link to Lee Harvey Oswald, but Trump actually went to secure the nomination shortly thereafter.

It’s a truly strange outcome given the media’s near-deafening silence regarding a host of well-researched, evidence-based, and compellingly written books on the assassination. Just ask David Talbot, James Douglass, and dozens of other journalists and academicians. They will all tell you that there is a de facto blackout of their work. And they will also tell you that the “conspiracy theory” or “theorist” label is a mortal wound in the mainstream press. But Trump suffered no such problem after peddling a specious “theory” published by a paper associated with journalistic quackery.

Like so many of his bloviations, Trump firmly planted the Kennedy assassination out in loony land. He also reinforced the idea of Oswald as the assassin. And he established himself as America’s most infamous and recognizable conspiracy theorist. But, just to take a page from The Donald’s playbook, maybe he unintentionally exposed himself as America’s ultimate crisis actor.

There’s no doubt that Trump’s campaign is an ongoing crisis. And he sure seems like he’s playing a character. And he’s falsely flagging the political landscape with cranky conspiracies, specious accusations, and “yuuuge” helpings of phony baloney.
  • And, most importantly, his tendentious shtick threatens to “conveniently” take real investigations with real evidence about real-life criminal conspiracies down in flames with him.

  • The problem is not that Obama is a secret Muslim. The problem is that he’s lorded over a mostly-secret, extra-judicial program to kill military-aged Muslim males with drones.

  • The problem is not that Obama and Hillary founded ISIS. The problem is the metastasizing U.S. imperium that’s arming the world and widening the so-called “War on Terror.”

  • The problem is not Muslims’ “infiltration” of the West. The problem is that America’s War on Terror is catalyzing an unprecedented global humanitarian nightmare.

  • The problem is not that the media is lying about Trump’s imploding campaign. The problem is that the media ignored the damning conclusions of the U.K.’s Chilcot Report and the troubling details of the long-anticipated “28 Pages” on Saudi involvement in 9/11.

  • The problem is not that China and Mexico have “clever” leaders who hoodwink Americans out of their economic birthright. The problem is that the executives of American corporations used that cheap labor to pad their executive compensation packages instead of paying middle-class wages to workers at home.

  • And the biggest problem of all is that real criminal conspiracies — like the “perfectly legal” scam of the hyper-financialized boom-and-bust-and-bailout economy — get hopelessly lost in the miasma of falsely flagged blather coming out of Trump’s gold-encrusted cakehole.

To be fair, he identified and exploited the quite real crisis of the two-party system. But his wacky act is making it easier and easier to discount his valid criticism of the Iraq War, of high-priced political puppetry, of anti-Russian hysteria, and of the selling out of American workers. Even worse, the quite real grievances of his supporters may get dismissively labeled as “conspiracy theories” even as he rides off to enjoy a great life as one of the world’s biggest celebrities.

Perhaps Robert De Niro nailed it when he likened Trump to a latter-day Travis Bickle. De Niro — whose performance in Taxi Driver made Bickle a cultural iconsaid that after Bickle’s crazy pronouncements and the film’s climactic bloodbath, “the irony at the end” is that Bickle “is back driving a cab.” Could that be Trump’s final act? Could Trump the crisis actor simply return to television with a bigger, more devoted audience than ever before?

Oddly enough, Travis Bickle was based on the diaries of Arthur Bremer — the man whose assassination attempt paralyzed presidential candidate George Wallace in 1972. Bremer said he was motivated by fame rather than by a political ideology … kinda like Trump, no?

Coincidentally, Trump has drawn comparisons to Wallace. And he was outraged by the recent release of another assassin —John Hinckley, Jr. Often ignored is the fact that the Hinckley family had a political relationship with the family of then-Vice President George H.W. Bush. Not ignored was Hinckley’s desire to impress Jodie Foster which, according to the official story, is why he shot Ronald Reagan. It was an obsession he got from watching — wait for it — Taxi Driver. It all still seems pretty darn spooky.

Fortunately, Trump hasn’t falsely flagged that conspiracy … yet.


This article (Donald Trump the Crisis Actor: A Conspiracy to End All Conspiracy Theories) is an opinion editorial (OP-ED). The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of Anti-Media. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to JP Sottile and theAntiMedia.org.

Happy Birther-day to my Grandson!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It isn't necessarily "over", Graeme. I don't see the point in accepting hopelessly pessimistic proclamations like that as fact. It could be an opening to something better. Hillary, with the support of progressives in congress and senate, could tip the pendulum in the other direction. Hillary is not fascist. Obama is not fascist. I am sure they have both scrambled to keep their embarrassments from being reported, but that is not fascism, that's pride. That's damage control. They have not humiliated major press reporters, or banned, or shamed them at rallies, for reporting what they've said on TV and critiquing it. Pundits, no matter how wild and full of it, are allowed to critique them or else Fox and Brietbart would not exist. O'Reilly and Limbaugh would not be on the air. If they were fascist we wouldn't be reading the above article about the press. Trump is scarier because he doesn't even want to allow the possibility of being publically criticized for anything - even his own recorded words that everyone just witnessed hours ago. The press is not shilling for Hillary - they don't have to because Trump is blundering all on his own.

I'd rather Hillary be in charge than an American version of Kim Jong Il (unhinged leader who creates mythology surrounding his own importance).
 
Last edited:
In Honor of Elvis Presley who died on August 16, 1977:
  • Who (I am not among them) some Conspiracy Theorists speculate is not really dead.
In Honor of my Grandson who was Born on August 16, 2002:
  • Who (without malice) at the now tender age of 14 introduces me as a Conspiracy Theorist to his friends.
In Honor of Donald Trump the Crisis Actor on August 16, 2016:
  • Who some people speculate may be "A Conspiracy to End All Conspiracy Theories"

With each passing day the 2016 presidential campaign looks more and more like an angry subreddit moderated by a genetically engineered “double-y chromosome” man-child constructed from the DNA of David Icke and Alex Jones.

Although it’s easy to dismiss this long, strange electoral trip as a passing political malady rising from America’s fever swamps, there are plenty of good reasons to get into the tin foil millinery business.

For a start, the main contest pits a Republican “Birther” who is allegedly popular with “Truthers” running against a notorious Democratic triangulator who many inside her own party believe not only jury-rigged the primaries, but also won with help from her conniving cronies in the mainstream media.

On the other side, the indefatigable Alex Jones is Donald Trump’s loudest and most confrontational alt-media megaphone. The matchmaker behind Alex and Donald’s brash bromance is “on-again/off-again” Trump confidant and all-around dirty trickster Roger Stone. Stone is now a fixture on Jones’s Infowars. Together they form a Trumpian tag-team ever-ready to body-slam any globalist who gets in Donald’s way. And they’re selling a few t-shirts, too.

Meanwhile, a former acting CIA Director pegged Trump as an “unwitting” stooge of a power-hungry former KGB agent (codename “Putin”) who, if you believe the Cold War rebooters, runs Russia like he’s a cat-stroking Bond villain. Apparently, Putin desperately needs to place a stooge in the White House to achieve his plans for world domination.

Then again, others wonder if Putin’s stooge is, in fact, actually a Manchurian candidate surreptitiously paving the way for Hillary Clinton’s ultimate victory. That plot was supposedly triggered by the husband (codename “Bubba”) of the Manchurian Candidate’s opponent (Agent HRC) during a “friendly” phone call just weeks before Trump began his political suicide mission to blow up the GOP.

What we know for certain is that since securing the nomination Trump has self-destructed like an orange-hued Mission Impossible tape. Are his jaw-dropping “mistakes” merely the execution of a sinister plot to elect an otherwise unelectable candidate? And does this plot bring us closer to the alien lizard apocalypse?

Well, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair has long lobbied the government to finally open its vault and reveal what it knows about extra-terrestrial visitors to planet Earth — a wish that Hillary says she’ll grant if elected. So, cue the Twilight Zone music and maybe we’ll find out.

And, in the latest plot thickening development, an actual former CIA “Operations Officer” named Evan McMullin threw his hat (and his trenchcoat) into the crowded presidential ring. Doesn’t it just stand to reason that #NeverTrumpsters would promote an unknown Mormon spook who used to pick out people for rendition or assassination and, amazingly enough, who also once worked as a Goldman “sacks of cash” collector?

Frankly, Mr. McMullin’s “stage right”— or “staged” by the right — entrance fits perfectly into an election year narrative that could be written like a ransom note with letters cut out of Hillary Clinton’s missing emails.

And if all of this doesn’t have you reaching for a shiny hat to protect your aching head, then consider how the cognitive dissonance of these narratives and counter-narratives might be making this election something more than an exercise in futility or a mere choice between two competing evils.

That’s because the real story of this election is how the media’s regurgitative approach to journalism serves up all of Trump’s poorly digested red herrings to a truth-starved population. Trump croaks out cranky tropes like an alt-right toad, and the cable newscyclers eat it up and spit it back out again.

It’s the logical outcome of their profitable fixation on a man who’s made more baseless claims than a professional auto accident insurance scammer. And the rubbernecking media obsessively obliged him while also paving his path to the nomination with an unprecedented supply of “free” media coverage.

But now that obsession is transforming this election into a referendum on sneaking suspicions, conspiracy theories, and the strange epithet of “trutherism.” The term “truther” is usually applied to anyone who refuses to buy the official story of 9/11. But “truther” is kinda strange because it turns the word “truth” into a term of derision and disdain. It’s the type of disdain that’s long been reserved for the CIA-generated phrase “Conspiracy Theory.”

“Conspiracy Theory” was the CIA’s response to growing doubts about the Warren Commission’s lone-nut, magic bullet, “move along, there’s nothing to see here” spin on the public execution of President John. F. Kennedy. Stoked by lawyer Mark Lane’s landmark book Rush to Judgment (1966) and by the increasingly high-profile investigation of New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, the CIA desperately needed a counter-conspiracy strategy to fight the public’s growing doubts.

What they got was a masterpiece of disinformation.

The counter-narrative approach was outlined in “CIA Document #1035-960.” The stated aim of the memo was “to provide material countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists.” And that it did. Most importantly, they married the words “theorist” and “theory” to “conspiracy.” By performing that simple semantic trick they weaponized “doubt” and turned it back on the doubters.

And it succeeded beyond Langley’s wildest dreams.

Not only did it generate doubt about the copious evidence compiled by Garrison (who the New York Times dismissively labeled a “theorist” in the headline of his 1992 obituary). And not only did it give sheepish journalists an easy way out of asking hard questions about the assassination. But it also cut off inquiry into just about anything that needed to be tidied-up with an “official story.”

From the Gulf of Tonkin Incident to the October Surprise to CIA cocaine trafficking to the public executions of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy and dozens of other evidence-laden “conspiracies,” the “conspiracy theory” label became a one-size fits all solution to the problem of public doubt about official cover-ups, illegal wars, and political corruption.

And now — in this era of mortal doubts about politics, endless war, banking hijinx, media manipulation, and even the “American Dream”— we suddenly find ourselves drowning in a sea of conspiracy theories.

As of the writing of this story, you can put “Trump Conspiracy Theory” into the Google machine and it’ll spit out “About 30,600 results.” But that’s just the tip of the iceberg (which, according to Trump, isn’t really melting because global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the wily Chinese). If you click on “More news for ‘Trump Conspiracy Theory’” you’ll get 1,930 results just in the “recent news” category!

Among the mountain of stories filed by hundreds of news sources, the GOP’s profligate nominee has inserted “conspiracy theory” directly into the headlines of stories about Orlando Massacre, the outcome of the forthcoming election, the founding of ISIS, the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Syrian refugees, and dozens upon dozens more. When it comes to spouting disinformation, Trump is a psychological warrior’s dream come true.

Strangely enough, the only theory he’s avoided talking about is the Birther movement he helped to create. Then again, Trump implies that Obama’s true allegiance is to Muslim terrorists for whom, the assertion goes, he’s working for as a secret agent inside the White House. Maybe that’s where Putin got the idea?

Trump did ratchet-up the cognitive dissonance when he threw the Kennedy Assassination into the swirling mix of tropes clogging up this campaign. Amazingly, Trump not only got away with peddling the National Enquirer’s flaccid, evidence-free “conspiracy theory” about Senator Ted Cruz’s father’s alleged link to Lee Harvey Oswald, but Trump actually went to secure the nomination shortly thereafter.

It’s a truly strange outcome given the media’s near-deafening silence regarding a host of well-researched, evidence-based, and compellingly written books on the assassination. Just ask David Talbot, James Douglass, and dozens of other journalists and academicians. They will all tell you that there is a de facto blackout of their work. And they will also tell you that the “conspiracy theory” or “theorist” label is a mortal wound in the mainstream press. But Trump suffered no such problem after peddling a specious “theory” published by a paper associated with journalistic quackery.

Like so many of his bloviations, Trump firmly planted the Kennedy assassination out in loony land. He also reinforced the idea of Oswald as the assassin. And he established himself as America’s most infamous and recognizable conspiracy theorist. But, just to take a page from The Donald’s playbook, maybe he unintentionally exposed himself as America’s ultimate crisis actor.

There’s no doubt that Trump’s campaign is an ongoing crisis. And he sure seems like he’s playing a character. And he’s falsely flagging the political landscape with cranky conspiracies, specious accusations, and “yuuuge” helpings of phony baloney.
  • And, most importantly, his tendentious shtick threatens to “conveniently” take real investigations with real evidence about real-life criminal conspiracies down in flames with him.

  • The problem is not that Obama is a secret Muslim. The problem is that he’s lorded over a mostly-secret, extra-judicial program to kill military-aged Muslim males with drones.

  • The problem is not that Obama and Hillary founded ISIS. The problem is the metastasizing U.S. imperium that’s arming the world and widening the so-called “War on Terror.”

  • The problem is not Muslims’ “infiltration” of the West. The problem is that America’s War on Terror is catalyzing an unprecedented global humanitarian nightmare.

  • The problem is not that the media is lying about Trump’s imploding campaign. The problem is that the media ignored the damning conclusions of the U.K.’s Chilcot Report and the troubling details of the long-anticipated “28 Pages” on Saudi involvement in 9/11.

  • The problem is not that China and Mexico have “clever” leaders who hoodwink Americans out of their economic birthright. The problem is that the executives of American corporations used that cheap labor to pad their executive compensation packages instead of paying middle-class wages to workers at home.

  • And the biggest problem of all is that real criminal conspiracies — like the “perfectly legal” scam of the hyper-financialized boom-and-bust-and-bailout economy — get hopelessly lost in the miasma of falsely flagged blather coming out of Trump’s gold-encrusted cakehole.

To be fair, he identified and exploited the quite real crisis of the two-party system. But his wacky act is making it easier and easier to discount his valid criticism of the Iraq War, of high-priced political puppetry, of anti-Russian hysteria, and of the selling out of American workers. Even worse, the quite real grievances of his supporters may get dismissively labeled as “conspiracy theories” even as he rides off to enjoy a great life as one of the world’s biggest celebrities.

Perhaps Robert De Niro nailed it when he likened Trump to a latter-day Travis Bickle. De Niro — whose performance in Taxi Driver made Bickle a cultural iconsaid that after Bickle’s crazy pronouncements and the film’s climactic bloodbath, “the irony at the end” is that Bickle “is back driving a cab.” Could that be Trump’s final act? Could Trump the crisis actor simply return to television with a bigger, more devoted audience than ever before?

Oddly enough, Travis Bickle was based on the diaries of Arthur Bremer — the man whose assassination attempt paralyzed presidential candidate George Wallace in 1972. Bremer said he was motivated by fame rather than by a political ideology … kinda like Trump, no?

Coincidentally, Trump has drawn comparisons to Wallace. And he was outraged by the recent release of another assassin —John Hinckley, Jr. Often ignored is the fact that the Hinckley family had a political relationship with the family of then-Vice President George H.W. Bush. Not ignored was Hinckley’s desire to impress Jodie Foster which, according to the official story, is why he shot Ronald Reagan. It was an obsession he got from watching — wait for it — Taxi Driver. It all still seems pretty darn spooky.

Fortunately, Trump hasn’t falsely flagged that conspiracy … yet.


This article (Donald Trump the Crisis Actor: A Conspiracy to End All Conspiracy Theories) is an opinion editorial (OP-ED). The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of Anti-Media. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to JP Sottile and theAntiMedia.org.

Happy Birther-day to my Grandson!

In this whorl'd of complexity what would people know that are se upon simplicity?

Tis a curiosity ... gnu as a stray wildebeest ... some thing to be domesticated ... unlike the onager ... mon gole AN ass?
 
Ah, Kimmio. You don't know the meaning of fascism. (very few people do.) You use the word to describe something that you emotionally feel is bad. You can't do that. You can't think doing that. To think, you have to use words in their correct meaning.
As to fascism, Hillary is far the closest one to being a fascist. Trump is too much an egoist to be a fascist.
And, fascism, itself, is a very common sentiment in Canada. Several years ago, the wealthiest man in New Brunswick wrote in his newspaper a statement giving himself a place in government that could be done only by a fascist government. But he and his newspapers didn't know that because they didn't know what fascism meant.
emotionally, you want Hillary to win. To sustain that emotional feeling, you have to ignore all the evidence of what she did and what she supported in eight years in the cabinet. And you do ignore it.
You can't just make emotional decisions - which you are trapped into by your emotional use of words.

Monk's post is interesting and too close to the truth to be comfortable. But he strikes an odd note. He mentions his grandson't birthday without mentioning mine which is almost on us. Monk, how can you expect people to be prepared and save money when they don't know the date of my birthday?
 
Back
Top