Maybe it's becauseTrump has very few meaningful ideas - but he has the best words.
(Actually he has meaningful ideas but not in a good way)
(Actually he has meaningful ideas but not in a good way)
TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?
- Thread starter crazyheart
- Start date
Welcome to Wondercafe2!
A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!
RitaTG
Well-Known Member
Maybe you should be asking Mr. Trump for a dialogue of meaningful ideas........
I want to say more here but it would be very unkind...........
This will have to do for now.
You nummie (derived from numinous) sharing is supposed to be base level but in stoic, Spartan conditions sacredness is close to silence and keeping the common from knowing who's being screwed in success of the other! Thus absence of oral conditions is like godliness to the institutional cults ...
But it might be des crypt as a myth ... as long as the oligarchs don't understand ... thus chaos is missed in their world that is completely upset anyhow ... reverse psychosis? It amazes me how easily the simple loving folks get confused over sophistication!
Thus Sophie is left out of the dialogue between conflicting gods ...
Or maybe you're just enjoying shooting another human being down.
It would be wonderful to have such a dialogue with Donald J. Trump.
RitaTG
Well-Known Member
Not going to bite..................
The man is running for POTUS - that opens him up to more scrutiny than the average bear. It's the American people who have to take seriously if his temperament is fit for the job and hire him or not. But the rest of the world, after watching his behaviour, has a right to be concerned. The President of France said that Donald makes him wretch. President Obama has said Trump is unfit for the job. Several prominent people have questioned his emotional stability. I'm just agreeing with them. Based on his own behaviour - his outrageous statements, angry tweets in the middle of the night when he gets slighted, racist and sexist comments, obfuscations and lies (his statements have been highly inaccurate) his lack of foreign policy knowledge, and lack of basic empathy, authoritarian temper tantrums, and very poor diplomatic skill.
In Canada, CBC has reported that over 80% of Canadians, if they could, would vote for Clinton.
In Canada, CBC has reported that over 80% of Canadians, if they could, would vote for Clinton.
Last edited:
It was you who mentioned the idea of dialoguing with Trump. Then you try to swing around my honest response to make it sound like something trolling. Fascinating. Have a good evening RitaTG.
Source?
Kimmio said:
Of course. He's a Democrat who had Clinton in his cabinet.
Kimmio said:
Several Democrats, independents, and bitter Republicans.
Kimmio" said:
Really. And yet you're willing to overlook all of Clinton's flaws as a candidate... why exactly?
Kimmio said:
I'm not surprised that the CBC would claim as such. It's one of Canada's most biased news sources.
BetteTheRed
Resident Heretic
- Pronouns
- She/Her/Her
I wonder that about many of your posts, Jae. It's usually considered a rude comment, so I don't usually make it, but you went first...
I think Mr. Drumpf is like that turtle on a post. Not sure how he got there, or what the hell to do up there.
You can find Holland's comments in several other news sources, also...
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/03/politics/donald-trump-francois-hollande/
Obama made his comments at a press conference from the White House while meeting with the leader of Singapore. This is more significant than making them during a campaign speech stumping for Hillary. He called on Republicans to not endorse Trump. He said that while he disagreed with Romney and McCain on several things, he never felt they were unfit for the job. Whereas, Trump is clearly showing he is unfit. Obama called on people to retract their endorsement of Trump, and put country before party. He implored them, from the Whitehouse, "When is enough, enough?" That's a big deal.
I am willing to overlook Clinton's flaws because she has her wits about her making her less dangerous for America and the world.
What do you mean, "other sources?"
Kimmio said:
He's a Democrat. She's was in his cabinet.
Kimmio said:
That kind of attitude (looking only at the flaws of one of the candidates) is dangerous.
Clinton is clever. I can agree with that.
I have looked at the flaws and in my opinion Trump's erratic and impulsive and angry personality is far more dangerous than any mistakes Hillary made or is alleged to have made. There's no "perfect choice", in Hillary, but she is less dangerous by far, and I think that ought to be the moral imperative right now.
Delightful Life
M&M, Cascadian Lovers
- Pronouns
- She/Her/Her
Pr. Jae is not responsible for Trump
Nor is he responsible for Kimmio's feelings here
Nor yours. Please don't fall into the trap of scapegoating Pr. Jae because he isn't using words that you like in this case?
This is one of the reasons Scott Adams has openly now supported Clinton because he is rightly afraid of being hurt physically by a Trump hater.
We are a jealous people as it says in the bibble.
You nor anyone else knows how Clinton nor Trump is going to do as POTUS
Though u will use confirmation bias to select the experiences that fit your internal movie.
Just please dont foist off your anxieties etc in this case on Pr. Jae
At least Trump didnt steal the POTUS away from Bernie...
Oh Christian free will where are you?
Dust in the wind...
(similar attitudes here that causes some christians to follow a deity that is a genocidal psychopath and muslims to accept as the cream of humanity a murderer who doesnt like the arts...)
And so it goes.
Some Democrats are now supporting Trump. What's your point?
Yes, professor/ Dr. Whimsey.
I think we do have a pretty good idea of how Trump would be as president - impulsive, bad tempered, authoritarian, childish and unable to take advice. Fine for TV - his mistakes would be limited to personal and business decisions - but not for one of the most powerful leaders in the world.
And Hillary would handle herself much as she did as Sec. Of State but seems to be more capable of listening to what people want (Bernie) and making compromises and learning from errors. She has diplomatic skills whereas Trump does not. She's a known entity - Trump is erratic.
Graeme Decarie
Well-Known Member
Religion and politics are not separate. The churches have separated them as a matter of convenience. Jesus spoke of religion in terms of our behaviour - as Moses did. One cannot bomb Libya to steal its oil, and still pretend to be a Christian. But that is precisely what our 'Chistians' do.
I do not suggest that churches should rule. I do say they have a responsbility to guide their followers into being concious of their behaviour and to encourage a Christian response to government. But that doesn't happen.
Christians in World War Two fought against Christians in Germany and Italy. On all sides, most of the church leaders chose patriotism over faith. (Yes, I know some German clergy opposed Hitler. Their number has been much exaggerated.)
It is impossible to see a trace of morality of any sort in Trump or Clinton. But those are the only choices in the nation that many want declared officially a Christian nation.
If Jesus were here, would he be encouraging Americans to bomb Libya. to murder over a million in Syria - to murder several million in Vietnam....and so it goes. And the churches, for the most part, are either silent or compliant. In the U.S., millions go hungry and homeless and badly educated while grossly exaggerated contracts are handed over to the defence industry.
The church should not rule, of course. But it should play a role in encouraging thought about the lack of any Christianity in our social behaviour.
After two thousand years of Christianity, we live in a society whose economic system is based on greed - and which abuses us and people all over the world. We murder people by the millions so that the oil industry can make bigger profits. We largely separate our faith from our behaviour. And that is largely condoned by our churches.
Faith occurs all over the world in blocs. Canada is largely Christian. The U.S. navy SEAL who recently murdered an environmentalist in Guatemala was ordered to do so by the Christian, Obama. The countless refugees who have drowned or died of exposure and starvation were forced to flee because of attacks either staged or financed by Christians.
But why is the west mostly Christian, Africa heavily Muslim, India Hindu, etc.
That`s because we adopt religion based largely on the dominant religion in our communiites. Having `faith`` becomes largely a matter of conforming, being accepted. And the churches follow much the same formula in relation to the state. That`s why the Saturday sermonettes in my local paper are always bland little things - `Believe in Jesus, and you will sleep better.``That`s not what Jesus preached about. He preached about our behaviour - and our real behaviour cannot be separated from our political behaviour.
The whole world have never been so heavily armed as it is today. we send young people to die in wars that are of benefit only to the wealthy. I cannot believe Jesus would allow that to pass in silence.
It`s all very well for churches to preach about what heaven will be like. But it it would be nice if they should also talk about keeping people alive as long as possible, and helping them to live in dignity and without fear.
There is no wall between politics and faith. The pity is that so many us are on the insane side of the wall.
I do not suggest that churches should rule. I do say they have a responsbility to guide their followers into being concious of their behaviour and to encourage a Christian response to government. But that doesn't happen.
Christians in World War Two fought against Christians in Germany and Italy. On all sides, most of the church leaders chose patriotism over faith. (Yes, I know some German clergy opposed Hitler. Their number has been much exaggerated.)
It is impossible to see a trace of morality of any sort in Trump or Clinton. But those are the only choices in the nation that many want declared officially a Christian nation.
If Jesus were here, would he be encouraging Americans to bomb Libya. to murder over a million in Syria - to murder several million in Vietnam....and so it goes. And the churches, for the most part, are either silent or compliant. In the U.S., millions go hungry and homeless and badly educated while grossly exaggerated contracts are handed over to the defence industry.
The church should not rule, of course. But it should play a role in encouraging thought about the lack of any Christianity in our social behaviour.
After two thousand years of Christianity, we live in a society whose economic system is based on greed - and which abuses us and people all over the world. We murder people by the millions so that the oil industry can make bigger profits. We largely separate our faith from our behaviour. And that is largely condoned by our churches.
Faith occurs all over the world in blocs. Canada is largely Christian. The U.S. navy SEAL who recently murdered an environmentalist in Guatemala was ordered to do so by the Christian, Obama. The countless refugees who have drowned or died of exposure and starvation were forced to flee because of attacks either staged or financed by Christians.
But why is the west mostly Christian, Africa heavily Muslim, India Hindu, etc.
That`s because we adopt religion based largely on the dominant religion in our communiites. Having `faith`` becomes largely a matter of conforming, being accepted. And the churches follow much the same formula in relation to the state. That`s why the Saturday sermonettes in my local paper are always bland little things - `Believe in Jesus, and you will sleep better.``That`s not what Jesus preached about. He preached about our behaviour - and our real behaviour cannot be separated from our political behaviour.
The whole world have never been so heavily armed as it is today. we send young people to die in wars that are of benefit only to the wealthy. I cannot believe Jesus would allow that to pass in silence.
It`s all very well for churches to preach about what heaven will be like. But it it would be nice if they should also talk about keeping people alive as long as possible, and helping them to live in dignity and without fear.
There is no wall between politics and faith. The pity is that so many us are on the insane side of the wall.
Bernie? Are you forgetting already how the primaries were rigged against Bernie (not of course Hillary, she had nothing to do with that)? That Hillary gave him a little lip service at the end is nothing.