You say music is vital and yet it sounds like you're happy to relegate some very good music to the dustbin or "heritage". I'm curious what makes a "heritage hymn". It can't be words. Many of the old standards can, and have been, given new lyrics to deal with issues raised by their theology and the gender and racial attitudes of their time. Others still work fine. Is it music? Age? Rather than having "heritage hymns" versus others, I would rather see the whole hymnody (in the UCCan case, VU and MV) available for usage without quotas. If a hymn works in a service, it shouldn't matter if it is "heritage" or "contemporary" or whatever. It should be used.