crazyheart
Rest In Peace: tomorrow,tomorrow
How can you tell jae is back?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no idea what the scholarly consensus is and grew up with the same version as you. Consensus does not make something right in any case, only accepted.
Mendalla said:And I see no reason why it could not be as Dr. Boice suggests. And if you are going to play the credentials game, I would suggest he wins. His about page is quite impressive.
Mendalla said:That said, you are right that @BetteTheRed may have overstated her case.
To me, what @BetteTheRed posted, "the other, since un-named, is presumed to be a female." sounds like she was claiming it to be the consensus, since she didn't identify who was making the presumption.
It could be as Dr. Boice suggests. That said, as I've said, most depictions I've seen suggest otherwise. For example, check out https://www.google.ca/search?site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=613&q=road to emmaus&oq=road to emmaus&gs_l=img.3...734.2492.0.3209.15.9.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..15.0.0.0.aHI21J47HIs
I was interested in what Dr. Boice's credentials were, as his is a name new to me, however I was not able to locate his "about" page.
The words "the author" in my post linking to the article is a link.![]()
To be clear, I'm not claiming that the second disciple could not have been a woman. However, I do question Bette's statement that they are presumed to be - as though the majority of opinion swings that way. As I said - this is the first I've ever heard of such a suggestion and I say that as someone who's been in the Church for over 50 years and who is studying Scripture at the graduate level.
The second was the official launch service of a friend's new Korean Baptist church (my friend is the pastor). People from about 10 churches came together to help celebrate and dedicate the church to God.
I'm curious about the process of a church becoming a particular person's 'thing'. I haven't heard this before. The ordained people I have heard say things like 'The congregation I serve' , not 'My church'.
I have chosen to presume that one of the people on the road was female for many years. I had a very open and encouraging feminist religion teacher and I'm pretty sure she suggested that when a person wasn't given a name in the text they could easily be female. Made sense to me then and now.
I'm curious about the process of a church becoming a particular person's 'thing'. I haven't heard this before. The ordained people I have heard say things like 'The congregation I serve' , not 'My church'.
The disciple could have been female. However, I am not aware that the majority opinion amongst Bible scholars is that the disciple was female.
How can anyone assume that someone in the bible is female if it's not specified? The bible is written to and mostly about, males. If you're going to assume a gender, at least go with the odds.I have chosen to presume that one of the people on the road was female for many years. I had a very open and encouraging feminist religion teacher and I'm pretty sure she suggested that when a person wasn't given a name in the text they could easily be female. Made sense to me then and now.
First I've heard about theologians voting on interpretations and opinions.
There are lots of those churches out there - generally not associated in any formal way with a mainstream denomination.It's my friend's church in that he had the vision to plant the church, he led his family in doing the organization and fund-raising required to plant the church, and he is now the pastor of the church.
One thing for sure - we are each entitled to hold our own views and opinions. There is a lot to be said for sharing and discussing them too.
Oh for frick's sake, Jae. Do you realize how annoying you are when you dig & dig & dig at a minor choice in words.
Let me state that since my involvement with the United Church of Canada, the discussions on females in the stories has been common including such items as mentioned by BetteTheRed.
As we all know, you come from a denomination that has significantly different understanding of women and women's roles.
We get it. You don't agree.
Can you leave it at that? or are you going to continue to go on ad nauseam on this topic.