Well it's only 10 p.m. here. My brain's still active.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I suggest DaisyJane is the one narrowing the lens to her own perspective. And now that disability is equated with impairment in this ruling rather than seeing disability as the barriers in society, everyone with a disability is implicated - not just people with very severe impairments like DaisyJane's son. And although the ruling favours the equal right for people to choose death because they feel too much suffering from their impairments - it doesn't protect people suffering the disabling effects of society by distinguishing impairment from disability (and leaving disability out for that reason). DaisyJane is not being fair and is narrowing the perspective, not me. I am expanding it by separating impairment from disability. She's narrowing it by lumping them together. So is this ruling. So does the medical model.I agree with DaisyJane putting such a narrow lens on an issue does not help anyone. It is an example of that metaphor that says if you have a hammer every problem is a nail.
What do you mean by specified? Why not let go of the concept that disability=medical impairment, and instead recognize that medical impairment=medical impairment and disability is the disabling factors in society (regardless of whether the red tape we have to deal with has caught up yet or not - the red tape is notoriously limiting in definition because those who design it are out of date)? What do you have to lose by that shift in mindset? Because the social model is now part of international human rights law that PWDs themselves achieved - human rights that are there for you. Why do you need to hang on to the word disability to describe impairment? What advantage is there to you or anyone else in doing that? Two seperate words to describe two distinct but related concepts. What is wrong with that?Thanks. I'm still not a fan of limiting what a disability is so much. It doesn't mean I'm against the social model, I think it should be specified. Good to know what terms are used when the definitions are restricted though.
From my example, what social/attitudinal or systemic barriers are there? Environmental could be debated, but that's outside the social model.
I am only trying to seperate impairment from disability to highlight the difference (and I'll use myself as an example for illustration of my point) between impairment and disability. At home, if I experience stiffness and balance problems getting things done before work and it takes more time - that is me experiencing my impairment. If, in addition to the time it takes being unpredictable depending on how I feel, on the way to work I have difficulty navigating high curbs or going around sidewalk repairs/ construction, I miss the bus, and I am late and I get reprimanded at work for not fitting expectations about timeliness - that is me experiencing disability. I didn't do anything 'wrong', it's the way my impairment interacted with the visible and invisible barriers - i.e. expectations about normal time things take, and sidewalk issues.
Absolutely that happened. I had no idea until about 10 or 15 years ago that my grandfather had a sister that was in some sort of institution since young adulthood. He never talked about her. I never met her. My grandma showed me a photo in an album one day from a visit - must have been in the 80s sometime - that they made to see her. She said "oh she had a nervous breakdown. She wasn't quite right. She's y'know, different." She looked okay to me, and I thought "and she's still there after all this time, and that's it? How awful." and I think I said something to that effect but my grandma brushed over it. I think there was some guilt or shame or something about that. She's passed away, but the rest of the family never really knew her. I didn't know anything about her.
People are going to like what they like for their own reasons Cousin. Are we really going to try to limit people's freedom to like things? If it's a serious-enough issue for you - maybe send Pinga a private wondermail about it.I love it how @Pinga always "likes" all the sarcastic remarks made to me in a debate. It's really nice to get that extra slap in the face from the spectators.
Forest fire smoke, pollen are big issues for me.Environmental is not outside the social model - like building wider sidewalks without steep graduations at curb crossings. Or automatic door openers, or crossings with sounds for visually impaired people. That recognizes disabling factors in the environment outside of the person. Not weather though, if that's what you're thinking. Although transportation supports or people to assist could help with that too. As could allowing a person to work from home if at all possible (in the case of employment) or flexibity about start times to accommodate problems accessing transportation. So that goes along with attitudes I guess.
And like everryone else who has a spot to be at a certain time, you should start earlier.
My son travels via TTC and GO to work, about an hour plus a ten minute walk when he gets there.
His job is fairly flexible. Go home 8 hours after you arrive more or less.
But sometimes his commute takes him 70 minutes, sometimes, 60, rarely 90 minutes.
He plans on it taking 80 minutes. If he is early, the trains on time, no rain........ Then he has time to grab a coffee.
You have to do the same.
If it normally takes you two hours from the time you wake to arrive at the office then that is your aim. But if sometimes it takes 21/2 hours then you should plan for that each day.
It then becomes a bonus if you arrive early. Time for coffee, ......
Everyone is like this, not just you. It isnt your disability. It is you using your disability as an excuse
When i was an RN working in a Toronto hospital, it wasnt ok to be late. The job didnt wait. You planned on being early. Shift changed at 7:30. I was always there at 7. That gave me a 30 minute window for bus , subway, traffic jam trouble. I was only late once. When the Gardner shut down due to an accident and i got stuck on it . Actually we all slowly started backing up the on ramps to get off but......
The rare day when the subway would shut down completely was a different thing. The night nurses stayed till the day nurses arrived.
But missing the bus was not an excuse. get there earlier
I get that with your mobility issues you can have bad days. But in all honesty, so do we all.
You wake up to rush to work and your babysitter is sick.
Your toddler refusese to put on their snow suit
You let the dog out to pee and she escapes into the neighbours yard
The plow hasnt hit your street yet and you cant get out
You run for the bus and it doesnt wait for you
.........
So you start early and enjoy the extra time at work if you get it
Or you are lucky like my son. If all goes well and he arrives half hour early, he can leave half hour early. Unless of course he has a late meeting
People are going to like what they like for their own reasons Cousin. Are we really going to try to limit people's freedom to like things? If it's a serious-enough issue for you - maybe send Pinga a private wondermail about it.