Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was supposedly a Muslim prophet. As was Jesus. Each new Abrahamic religion loves to claim that they are the ones who finally got it right.
Was there something you learned that is worth sharing?
Abraham submitted to God , he wasn't a Muslim
I never said Jesus was a christian
Muslims revere a long line of "Prophets of God," starting with Adam, including Abraham, Moses, and Jesus, and culminating in Mohammed.
not according to the old testament & new testament , only according to the Muslims. Islam began through the linage of Ishmael the son of Abraham & his concubine Sara.
not according to the old testament & new testament , only according to the Muslims. Islam began through the linage of Ishmael the son of Abraham & his concubine Sara.
we know in the old testament by Gods very first law "You shall have no other gods before Me" would indicate that there are other gods in the world,( they are false gods but that is another subject ) so Islam meaning one who submits to god, the question would be which god?, according to prophet Mohammed who spoke of a god not like the God of the OT or the God of Jesus Christ , we would have to conclude that the Muslims prophets and false prophets and not of the Creator.
BetteTheRed said:I don't think Abraham was Jewish, actually. No-one was Jewish until they received the Law from Moses.
Saudi Arabia has denounced the killings as a "cowardly terrorist attack that was rejected by the true Islamic religion."
To show the world how Islam really treats people who speak out against it, they are only going to flog a blogger who insulted Islam 1,000 times, fine him $266,000 USD and jail him for 10 years.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/08/saudi-arabia-blogger-raif-badawi-public-flogging
See? Those guys who killed a dozen people because some of them dared to insult Islam weren't really acting as Islam teaches. In Saudi Arabia, the Muslim judges would have only had the cartoonists beaten thousands of times, fined them their entire life savings, and thrown them in jail for a decade or so. Real Islamic rule of law is so much more tolerant in a country like Saudi Arabia.
But, like what people have determined are the fundementals of Christianity (some would say that the fundementals of Christianity are "love God...and like unto it...love your neighbour, but others would say it's all about opposing same sex marriage and that only men can be preachers in church, and that the bible is to be read literally, they tend to be the loudest, unfortunately - doesn't make them right) - moderate Muslims need to define, or redefine, for the world, the fundementals - what's important to their faith. Those are the fundamentals. They are a choice.You'd have to ask them. They are doing a good job of speaking out against the criminals in France, but part of the problem is not necessarily the Islamic fundamentalists, but the fundamentals of Islam (with apologies to Sam Harris). They have scriptural backing for what they are doing to Raif Badawi. They have scriptural reasons for not letting women drive, or be found alone with a man who is not their husband.
But, like what people have determined are the fundementals of Christianity (some would say that the fundementals of Christianity are "love God...and like unto it...love your neighbour, but others would say it's all about opposing same sex marriage and that only men can be preachers in church, and that the bible is to be read literally, they tend to be the loudest, unfortunately - doesn't make them right) - moderate Muslims need to define, or redefine, for the world, the fundementals - what's important to their faith. Those are the fundamentals. They are a choice. They have been a choice, how they are interpreted and learned, as the stories even suggest, since the beginnings of Abrahimic religion. In the first place, Islam came about because of a choice to depart from Christianity and Judaism, didn't it? Christianity was a departure from legalistic "fundementals" of Judaism. In the west, today, making a choice to look at faith in a new way comes with less of a price for those who risk it, than in Saudi Arabia. That's why I'd like to see more Muslims stand up in Western countries, peacefully, and open up a new way. There's not much that non-Muslims can do to stop it - that creates even more conflict. It has to come from Muslims.
And like Christianity, the scripture remains unchanged, ready to be used again by fundamentalist nutcases for their own purposes and to fuel their religious delusions.But, like what people have determined are the fundementals of Christianity (some would say that the fundementals of Christianity are "love God...and like unto it...love your neighbour, but others would say it's all about opposing same sex marriage and that only men can be preachers in church, and that the bible is to be read literally, they tend to be the loudest, unfortunately - doesn't make them right) - moderate Muslims need to define, or redefine, for the world, the fundementals - what's important to their faith. Those are the fundamentals. They are a choice.
If you got rid of scripture - or simply denounced it all - the way humans are - people could just as easily misinterpret other books and movies. Religions would form around stories, still. There would be people who pandered to the worst aspects of stories, whether they involve a diety or not. They would revere something or someone to be an authority on what to think. And those who looked to the most humane interpretations. And, besides, what was seen as good intentions 1500+ years ago doesn't fit with what we understand to be good intentions for a more harmonious world now (well, I do think Jesus "fundementally" understood that it all comes down to caring for people, especially the most marginalized. He also understood that it would be a long road to get there - with roadblocks to be overcome along the way).And like Christianity, the scripture remains unchanged, ready to be used again by fundamentalist nutcases for their own purposes and to fuel their religious delusions.
The words are old, society has changed, and they were probably not all written with the best intentions in the first place. To take them as true, severely limits your wiggle room. And, it gives credibility to the worst parts.