Based on that ... Jesus did not come to fulfill the law? Jesus really has no significance whatsoever in the story if you have designated woman as less than even before 'the fall'. Nice ... we really have no where to go from there then do we? This has got to be the most ridiculous thing you have ever come up with ... I can understand fallibility in interpreting scriptures but to make the statement that Male was superior to Female right from the get go belies the rest of scripture in it's entirety does it not?
“The scriptures . . . offer an impressive number of examples of women exercising social or political authority without raising any questions as to the propriety of that authority.”
The Propriety of Bible Women with Authority | Marg Mowczko
I am thinking that
1 Corinthians 14:34-35 and
1 Timothy 2:12 had local and limited applications. They were about silencing women who were being disruptive and behaving badly. They were not meant to silence godly women. Paul valued godly, capable women ministers, and did not seem to think that any ministry was off limits to them. Neither did Jesus. What are we to make of that? And being that we are living in the present days what are we to make of this ...