blackbelt1961
Well-Known Member
Hey folks,
Please remember the purpose of this thread is to talk about Luke's gospel. Let's all do our best to focus on the text as it posted for discussion.
but we are, everyone posts are based on Luke 6: 37 - 42
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey folks,
Please remember the purpose of this thread is to talk about Luke's gospel. Let's all do our best to focus on the text as it posted for discussion.
Most people's are. Not everyone's.but we are, everyone posts are based on Luke 6: 37 - 42
Most people's are. Not everyone's.
Not in my view. I consider @unsafe to have taken us off topic although I understand how she got there. Her approach to scripture allows any passage in the bible to be used to explain any other.I just checked, other than Chansen's typicals , all the posts since your first post of Luke 6:37-42 , at # 631, have been comments on that particular passage
Not in my view. I consider @unsafe to have taken us off topic although I understand how she got there. Her approach to scripture allows any passage in the bible to be used to explain any other.
The lengthy posts which get into other scriptures tend to disrupt the flow of discussion on the thread IMO.
Or maybe we need to understand the text we are studying, to get a good understanding of the character of Jesus.but a lot of times we need to understand the character of Jesus & the times through other passages, to get a good understanding of what we are studying.
like I posted earlier, scripture usually interprets itself, to understand a passage sometimes we look to other passage to understand Character, context and Times of writings and to whom it was written to . That's Honest biblical study, you cannot stick to one passage and Hope to get Truth out of it because for one, there are no numbered passages, they were inserted for ease of the reader, that's it.
No. People interpret Scripture. When someone says that Scripture interprets itself, 987.6 % of the time it it an individual's interpretation of another passage of Scripture,usually managing to conflate their own two interpretations of two separate passages.
Is there a Scripture that says that?
It's really the Closed Circle approach, or the Black Hole of thought, as no new thoughts or thinking is ever allowed. Rather than Scripture speaking for itself, some authority figure or other has decreed and declared THIS INTERPRETATION ONLY as the "right" one.it's what they call hermeneutical approach to understanding, scholars use it, pastors use it, which is an honest approach, to allow scripture to speak for its self as much as we humanly can, thats called honesty.
IT is certainly a valid hermeneutical tool used by many. It is especially important when weighing what the whole of Scripture has to say on a point. However, like any other hermeneutical tool, it should never be the only approach brought to a passage. And when used properly it allows (or forces) us to acknowledge that there are topics on which Scripture does not speak with one voice.it's what they call hermeneutical approach to understanding, scholars use it, pastors use it, which is an honest approach, to allow scripture to speak for its self as much as we humanly can, thats called honesty.
It's really the Closed Circle approach, or the Black Hole of thought, as no new thoughts or thinking is ever allowed. Rather than Scripture speaking for itself, some authority figure or other has decreed and declared THIS INTERPRETATION ONLY as the "right" one.
IT is certainly a valid hermeneutical tool used by many. It is especially important when weighing what the whole of Scripture has to say on a point. However, like any other hermeneutical tool, it should never be the only approach brought to a passage. And when used properly it allows (or forces) us to acknowledge that there are topics on which Scripture does not speak with one voice.
it's what they call hermeneutical approach to understanding, scholars use it, pastors use it, which is an honest approach, to allow scripture to speak for its self as much as we humanly can, thats called honesty.
Scripture interpreting itself, sola scriptura, is a hermeneutic approach originally linked to the Lutheran Reformation which argued that Scripture alone, NOT Scripture and the church, is the source of Christian revelation. The idea was the Scripture alone, not papal authority, clerical dogma, or church tradition, informs Christian thought.
While sola scriptura was originally intended to be empowering for communities of faith, like all claims to Divine authority, it has the power to be cruel and abusive.