revjohn
Well-Known Member
Hi Pr. Jae,
True. You didn't. As RitaTG affirms there is often conflation and in responding I felt it necessary to start with sexual orientation in order to clear some room for what follows. This is necessary since, as you admit upthread, you don't believe God makes mistakes.
If we accept, as given that sexual orientation is not a matter of choice then we must next confront the issue of where it falls within the scheme of all things created.
From there it is easier to discuss transgenderism and whether it will be accepted or rejected.
So much is tied up in how communities of faith approach issues directly related to human sexuality.
Pr. Jae said:Never suggested that. What I was conversing about was gender, and I have already commented (to crazyheart) regarding my use of the word "mistake."
True. You didn't. As RitaTG affirms there is often conflation and in responding I felt it necessary to start with sexual orientation in order to clear some room for what follows. This is necessary since, as you admit upthread, you don't believe God makes mistakes.
If we accept, as given that sexual orientation is not a matter of choice then we must next confront the issue of where it falls within the scheme of all things created.
From there it is easier to discuss transgenderism and whether it will be accepted or rejected.
So much is tied up in how communities of faith approach issues directly related to human sexuality.