What Legacy Does Trump Leave?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Please cease commenting on the use of statistics unless you can better demonstrate a basic understanding of the concepts involved.

Aaron Brown teaches statistics at New York University and at the University of California at San Diego, and he writes regular columns for Bloomberg and Wilmott.

Brown holds an M.B.A. in Finance and Statistics from the University of Chicago and an S.B.in Applied Mathematics from Harvard.
 
When one considers the outliers (out liars) ... does it depend on whose the subjective point and whom' ms the objective when considering it is double edged? When one moves ... it comes back at you ...

Recall everything can be rationalized all you have to do is cross the red line ... the Ruby Con ... being up against the devil of complexity?

There is the implication of being involved ... that is to observe it from in or outside what lies ... there the MS Truth goes down as Ruth less ... in a cruel word of bad crews (either side)! It is reason to depart ... thus the Freudian pitch on the death wish ...

Both gods ande mans take part in the conflicted state ... rites by the remain as left for the condor and Jackal ...
 
@WhyCzar

Here's a study for you;from Stanford on those crime statistics:
"The study found that since 1960, immigrants have been imprisoned at increasingly lower rates than U.S.-born males. Various factors, such as age, marital status, education, and immigration policy, were examined but did not explain the trend. The likely explanation is that first-generation immigrants are faring better overall, with stable manual jobs and higher employment, marriage, and health rates.

The research concludes that globalization and technological advances have negatively impacted U.S.-born men, especially those without a high school diploma, making them more prone to unemployment, poor health, and crime. Immigrants, on the other hand, have remained adaptable and resilient, doing relatively well despite these challenges." - Copilot

That's enlightening!
 

Aaron Brown teaches statistics at New York University and at the University of California at San Diego, and he writes regular columns for Bloomberg and Wilmott.

Brown holds an M.B.A. in Finance and Statistics from the University of Chicago and an S.B.in Applied Mathematics from Harvard.

You can quote whatever you want, and I'll comment (probably otherwise, because you're on Ignore most of the time) if I think the credentials of who you quote are dubious. In my most correction of your thought processes, I was commenting on the wyrd conclusions you derived from what might or might not have been facts. Repeat after me: There is no correlation between the percentages of crimes solved and the demographic of the criminals. NONE. Unless the unsolved crime rate is so high that one cannot query enough cases to create a valid "n" (which would require an unsolved crime rate in excess of 90%, depending on the statistical significance you're trying to achieve, and I don't think that the most inadequate PD in the world is that awful), NO correlation.

I don't know why you brought up gun control. Guns don't kill people, although access to guns makes it easier, and in a country that contains both Tennessee and Massachusetts, restricting guns gets stupid with porous state borders. Gun control works particularly well on islands, witness the U.K. and NZ and Oz. It's even clear when examining the huge difference in murder rates between Canada and the U.S. that despite our fairly porous border with the U.S., our gun control laws work.

And if you're still rabbiting on about white males killing people, I am sorry, but they are still largely the heart of the problem. Angry white men try to control all of us; I'd say they're doing better with you than me, Rita, ya daft git.
 
While Trump is the POTUS it appears that the administration will continue to detain or deport illegal immigrants - based on the premise that illegal entry is itself a criminal offense first and foremost.

Further to that I provided a link to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) which is the nation’s largest federal law enforcement agency charged with securing the nation’s borders and facilitating international travel and trade.

@Jae I doubt that Research by Stanford’s Ran Abramitzky and co-authors will even be considered by the current US administration as they have access to all of the statistics and research from Official Government Links that I provided.
 
While Trump is the POTUS it appears that the administration will continue to detain or deport illegal immigrants - based on the premise that illegal entry is itself a criminal offense first and foremost.

My response from another thread. Only in a mutually agreed upon, totally artificial system called "nation states" is the movement of humanity upon Gaia subject to human laws. To that end:

"I'd like to gently remind some people that the current default human org structure is the "nation-state" and it is a totally artificial human construct.

And then I'd like to gently guide your imagination into a situation perhaps unfamiliar to you. You are not safe. You are not safely housed, you are hungering to the point of dying. That may be a fate that you can accept, but your children are dying. You see a faint chance at a life where your children will survive. At what point in this story does the legality of nation state boundaries supersede the human right to life? Illegal? Justice? "

What a far cry from:

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

It's a wonder lady liberty hasn't toppled herself.
 
@Jae I doubt that Research by Stanford’s Ran Abramitzky and co-authors will even be considered by the current US administration as they have access to all of the statistics and research from Official Government Links that I provided.
Trumps personally replaced information that matches his agenda?......possibly in a few years his tech buddies will deny access to articles that don't support his parties bias towards immigrants.
 
Impression of Karoline ... is she excessively confident without any great time of experience for living learning? Live and learn ... alas some can't see it!

How do confidence folk (men) rate with humble sorts that realise some questions should be asked ... that would cause the con men to put them down ... thus the descent of intelligence that we are observing. Imagine uneducated men of piety being disturbed by foreigners that have it ...

Who would call whom ... the reptiles, snakes lizards, etc. there is this urge regarding circumstantial presentations ... would the hubris be blind as they feel they have it all at their hand ... Jan ... Hwon, Yan, Hombre, ah? Something looking over your shoulder ...

Are immigrants aliens like Jesus ... coming over the ridge as enlightening the mysteries of life ... did you know that Ness was once known as "out cropping" ... doesn't cut it with observations from outside the emotional ring! Psychosis vs neurosis ... neurosis is related to worriers and it takes a worried man to say such things that lead to queries about mystery!

What is Trump's paranoia? Nothing like fear to raise misconceptions in psyche ... is Trump's psyche rather paranoid about losing the shroud ... that's cover!

Naked Emperors ... the unknown continues ... like great lies parallel to a true story ... par ad Ox? Contraries to look into ... they are huge as the great mother theory that Eve did it ... when all the time she was directed to the fruit by a man-god ... bad fruit? It is the way it all comes back at cha ... black reflections incarnating as the shadow in the plot! No doubt ... there are Lots ... then isn't the lot in the biblical record about de ville among us ...

Like anima vs ani mu ... it flip soude ... go figure!
 
Last edited:
The concern JK12 ... is that folk state things quickly from what, incarnate authority ... appearances that are falls? Consider the potential of repeating and regurgitation based on faith alone ... no queues lined up in the light of the dark situation ... and then we emerge ... into the unknown future ... isn't that something else?

People that say they know all without reading the signs, symbols and out casting that start to outnumber the powers ... becoming threats ... not that pretty to the totalitarian? Imagine unimpeded growth of the populace ... a grand paranoia to the rare one struck by false illusion ... de Lucian? Its a mother thing requiring admiration of when time is enough ... no more canon fodder ... the fight is over and we all become stick in the mud ... rheid, reid, read, or alternate ... when you find delf right intuit! Guessed or backed up by logical info ...

Does that make sense ? No more blind protocol ... as if that's the way it has always be done ... this has got to be experienced by those that can't see beyond the spot they've been confined ... source of a smudge in his*torize ... enough to form a beginning of something else ...
 
Does anyone think Trump is purposefully pissing off 2/3's of his own country and some other countries in the world in order to start a rebellion against his ideas and " party"?
Is he looking for a fight? Does he want a civil war?
 
By the way Trumps claim about sending the military in to fight the wildfires and turn the " faucets back on is false. The military were never there and was denied by California' s Department of Water Resources.
So his minion spokesperson purposely lied to reporters when she spoke.
 
Does anyone think Trump is purposefully pissing off 2/3's of his own country and some other countries in the world in order to start a rebellion against his ideas and " party"?
Is he looking for a fight? Does he want a civil war?

I don't think we can actually figure out what he wants.

The idea that he would want to create or trigger economic chaos in Canada to gain some control is very plausible. The US is very unlikely to use a military invasion for Canada. They do have some economic powers.
 
Back
Top