I prefer squirrel or weasel...he's good at gathering nuts....heroic warrior, naw!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I prefer squirrel or weasel...he's good at gathering nuts....heroic warrior, naw!
I prefer squirrel or weasel...he's good at gathering nuts....heroic warrior, naw!
What is so shrewd about a man that constantly fails? He doesn't deserve anyone's admiration, unfortunately the ones that could make him pee his pants in public, aren't running against him, whether it's the Republicans or Democrats.I agree. We can't just dismiss him as a squirrel or weasel though. He's a shrewd marketer and potentially very dangerous
What is so shrewd about a man that constantly fails? He doesn't deserve anyone's admiration, unfortunately the ones that could make him pee his pants in public, aren't running against him, whether it's the Republicans or Democrats.
Well I guess he learned from PT Barnum, there's a sucker born every minute.He's a marketer, not a successful businessman. The fact that people think he's a successful businessman (and billionaire?) is probably testament to his marketing skills.
Yes. I’d add that disabled people (vs strongmen masculinity) also are looked upon as weak. Gay and trans people nowadays can be used to do military bidding if they’re “useful” to that goal, or scapegoated if they’re not. Disabled people just get scapegoated.
I think fascism is more like a cultural, ideological atmosphere, empowered and fanned by junk media into what we have now. Personally, I don't want to live in anyone's utopia.Weasels are incredibly dangerous, bloodthirsty animals, at least some species (wolverines, for instance, are members of the weasel family). So calling him a weasel may not be too far off the mark, even though that's not usually what we mean by calling someone a "weasel".
Is he fascist? There's definite affinities there whether he meets the technical definition exactly or not. But I would say a lot of his challengers fill the bill to varying degrees, too. The GOP in general is feeling rather fascist and has been evolving that way. Trump has moved further that way than others, though, esp. with his populist appeal.
Weasels are incredibly dangerous, bloodthirsty animals, at least some species (wolverines, for instance, are members of the weasel family). So calling him a weasel may not be too far off the mark, even though that's not usually what we mean by calling someone a "weasel".
Is he fascist? There's definite affinities there whether he meets the technical definition exactly or not. But I would say a lot of his challengers fill the bill to varying degrees, too. The GOP in general is feeling rather fascist and has been evolving that way. Trump has moved further that way than others, though, esp. with his populist appeal.
I think the key is the populism and scapegoating. Nationalism (after all, Nazi = National Socialist) and militarism need to be in there too. Simply maintaining a society in which the privileged few have all the power and exploit others can be any number of systems/ideologies. Aristocracies and monarchies fill the bill, too, but long predate fascism, which is a relatively modern ideology.I believe seeking , creating, or maintaining a society in which a privileged few have all the power, exploit others, and are generally able to do what they want without consequences, possibly through populism and targeting scapegoats, is fascism.
I'm not sure about the term fascist for Trump,When you look at the actual characteristics of fascism, he fits. The video is short.
But democracy deposed him in 2020. I’m not sure he found that beneficial; and (God forbid) he is elected next year, it likely would be the last U.S. free election ever.I'm not sure about the term fascist for Trump,
He benefits too much from democracy to destroy it. That being said, democracy can still exist without liberalism.
I don't admire the man/ politics but I'm not convinced this label fits....
He and his GOP supporters have made it fairly clear that they only consider elections that they win to be fair. I fully expect to see them trying to rejig the system in their favour if they get control in 2024. Hopefully, the Dems keep at least one house (Reps, Senate, or White), which should help forestall that. Otherwise, I imagine we will see the GOP try to move to a rigged system like Russia where elections happen but the outcome is a foregone conclusion.But democracy deposed him in 2020. I’m not sure he found that beneficial; and (God forbid) he is elected next year, it likely would be the last U.S. free election ever.
He and his GOP supporters have made it fairly clear that they only consider elections that they win to be fair. I fully expect to see them trying to rejig the system in their favour if they get control in 2024. Hopefully, the Dems keep at least one house (Reps, Senate, or White), which should help forestall that. Otherwise, I imagine we will see the GOP try to move to a rigged system like Russia where elections happen but the outcome is a foregone conclusion.