paradox3
Peanuts Fan
- Pronouns
- She/Her/Her
To sing God's praises?So the question then becomes, why is The Lord keeping us?
To do God's work in the world?
To advance the kingdom?
Because God desires relationship with us?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To sing God's praises?So the question then becomes, why is The Lord keeping us?
To um, have us for lunch.To sing God's praises?
To do God's work in the world?
To advance the kingdom?
Because God desires relationship with us?
I suppose being a good shepherd, he would lead us out of the slaughter....BUT it's probably not part of the job description or what a shepherd actually does. It's just what the sheep would want and sheep are notorious for following the leader.To um, have us for lunch.
But seriously, while I am not necessarily impugning the Good Lord as being some kind of vicious predator, none of those is in the same league as sheering off our coat or slitting our throats and roasting us over an open fire. From the standpoint of a sheep, shepherds are really the kind face of a rather dark reality of exploitation. The psalm is very much a sanitized, humancentric take on that reality. Which you would expect from that society. The idea of non-hominin animals as beings with feelings is a modern, if not post-modern, one.
As an image of God, one could read it to mean God is taking care of us for his own purposes, not out of any special love for us. That does, however, contradict what we see in many other places in both Jewish and Christian scriptures.
Or perhaps the shepherd understands the inevitability of some sheep being slaughtered. They are raised for both meat and wool, after all.I suppose being a good shepherd, he would lead us out of the slaughter....BUT it's probably not part of the job description or what a shepherd actually does. It's just what the sheep would want and sheep are notorious for following the leader.
These curious coincidences sure make us wonder, don't they?Phillip Keller makes an interesting point about 23:5 in his book, "A Shepherd Looks at Psalm 23:"
"You prepare a table for me in the presence of my enemies."
The Shepherd goes ahead to the next valley to watch for dangers and root out noxious weeds or any other plants that are bad for sheep health.
Last year I was crossing a street at a busy intersection in town. The nearby driver at the stop sign didn't see me, as I stepped in front of him at the curb.
He zoomed at me and I somehow showed amazing reflexes in jumping back. He just missed me by an inch or 2. Shortly thereafter. I received a frantic call from Quentin in far-away Buffalo who has never called me before or since. Quentin had been in my youth group when I pastored a church in Buffalo. He said he had just had a powerful premonition that I had been killed and was desperate to know the truth. I told him about my close call. I've often wondered if my heavenly Shepherd had aniticipated the danger I was facing and given me better than usual reflexes to escape it. In any case, the precise timing of Quentin's premonition seems paranormal, even providential.
It sounds good but then we are faced with the fact that God can't do something and that opens up a can of worms.Or perhaps the shepherd understands the inevitability of some sheep being slaughtered. They are raised for both meat and wool, after all.
The poor sheep lead perilous lives. So do we.
Could this even be the whole point of the psalm? God can't prevent bad things happening to us but God promises to be present.
This is a major theme in Kushner's book.
You could go the process route where God's power is to guide us (meaning all beings, not just humans) to do his Will rather than being able to magic all the bad stuff away.It sounds good but then we are faced with the fact that God can't do something and that opens up a can of worms.
Could be he can but won't? Or he has an overall plan that we aren't privy to.
Here is a more dramatic example that parallels my testimony in post #46. Dr. E. Stanley Jones, a Methodist medical missionary to India, was perhaps the most famous Methodist minister of the 20th century. He tells the story of going to an Indian airport to book a flight to Dehli to attend a missionary conference where he was to be keynote speaker. But as he waited in a long ticket line, an inner voice insisted that he get out of line. At first he dismissed this message as unfounded paranoia. But the more he did, the more insistent the voice became! Finally, he succumbed to the voice and called conference officials to explain why he wasn't coming. Then the plane crashed, killing all its hundreds of passengers.
The fame of E. Stanley Jones made this miraculous escape big news. A Hindu reporter asked him, "So are you saying that God loved you so much that He warned only you and let hundreds of Hindus die?" Jones replied, "Oh no, God loves Hindus at least as much as me. It's just that I was the only one who was listening (to inner guidance)." On one level, this incident illustrates the protective Shepherd going on ahead to remove dangers fot those who listen for His voice. But it also raises the question of the conditions of divine guidance when faced with the chaos of tragedies that God does not control.
Which again, circles back into process. God could warn (through intuition or whatever) that something bad was looming but couldn't intervene. It's then incumbent on us to follow that "lure" (to use the process term), which Jones apparently did.ut it also raises the question of the conditions of divine guidance when faced with the chaos of tragedies that God does not control.
Absolutely hate this story. Despise it. Really, he thought it was a good idea to say that those hundreds died as they didn't listen? For f***'s sake. If he was so smart, and such a believer, he would have told the airport there was a problem with the plane.Here is a more dramatic example that parallels my testimony in post #46. Dr. E. Stanley Jones, a Methodist medical missionary to India, was perhaps the most famous Methodist minister of the 20th century. He tells the story of going to an Indian airport to book a flight to Dehli to attend a missionary conference where he was to be keynote speaker. But as he waited in a long ticket line, an inner voice insisted that he get out of line. At first he dismissed this message as unfounded paranoia. But the more he did, the more insistent the voice became! Finally, he succumbed to the voice and called conference officials to explain why he wasn't coming. Then the plane crashed, killing all its hundreds of passengers.
The fame of E. Stanley Jones made this miraculous escape big news. A Hindu reporter asked him, "So are you saying that God loved you so much that He warned only you and let hundreds of Hindus die?" Jones replied, "Oh no, God loves Hindus at least as much as me. It's just that I was the only one who was listening (to inner guidance)." On one level, this incident illustrates the protective Shepherd going on ahead to remove dangers fot those who listen for His voice. But it also raises the question of the conditions of divine guidance when faced with the chaos of tragedies that God does not control.
Absolutely hate this story. Despise it. Really, he thought it was a good idea to say that those hundreds died as they didn't listen? For f***'s sake. If he was so smart, and such a believer, he would have told the airport there was a problem with the plane.
This is why folks sometimes despise the righteous amongst us.
This is why folks sometimes despise the righteous amongst us.
The problem is that stories like that are often repeatedly used to show superiority or are tossed out as arguments in support of God or the faith of the person tossing it out. In fact, an event like that should be an opportunity for humility, to recognize that there but for grace go I and to meditate on our mortality. So I get Jayne's reaction fully.Wow ___the righteous despised for actually listening to an inner intuition of protection
Did you read my post? That was not an invitation to you to respond to Jayne, but for everyone to let the whole thing drop and focus on the Psalm.I will share no more personal applications of Psalm 23, except to conclude that Jayne's vitriol requires this response. When I was 19, I was invited to dinner with Dallas after his honeymoon. He mentioned that he and some friends were going hunting the next day. I suddenly sensed his skeleton and somehow knew he'd be killed in a hunting accident, and so I warned him not to go. He angrily dismissed my premonition as mean-spirited and lacking evidence. Well, his rifle accidentally discharged into his shoulder and he bled to death. So Jayne, E. Stanley Jones can be excused for not warning the airline of its impending crash without evidence!
I won't drop a thread-ban yet, but this is stopping now.Please keep threads on topic. BPoTW is intended as a focused forum with a specific theme, similar to a specialty forum. As in specialty forums, we ask that tangents and digressions be taken to threads in the appropriate general forum, usually Religion & Faith for discussion in this site.
This thread has taken a disappointing turn and I am done with it. Will be back with another BPoTW in about a month's time.