The Medium/Witch at Endor, 1 Samuel 28:3-25

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Status
Not open for further replies.
15 Then Samuel said to Saul, “Why have you disturbed me by bringing me up?” Saul answered, “I am in great distress, for the Philistines are warring against me, and God has turned away from me and answers me no more, either by prophets or by dreams; so I have summoned you to tell me what I should do.”
(1 Sam. 28:15, NRSV)

Verse 15 says specifically Samuel spoke. Whether you care to believe it or not, that's what the text says. It may not fit into your narrative of what the Bible should say, but that's clearly and plainly what the text says.

I note there's a transition in this story, too; at the beginning it is the medium is is frightened out of her wits (especially when she realizes who Saul is), and Saul, calmly reassuring her, At the end of the story the roles are reversed-- Saul ix scared crapless, and the medium seek to reassure him, urging him to eat. I don't know how significant that may be, but it seems to be a reversal of roles, just as Saul faces a reversal of fortune.
 
So @Mendalla - your thread title and BPotW abbreviation piqued my curiosity. In reading through the thread, I wondered about some other bits leading up to the passage quoted - so I went back & started Samuel at chapter one. Quite the adventure novel! There's a bit everything in there. I'm just at chpt 13 - taking a break to enjoy today's sunshine. Thanks for the prompt to read something I would not otherwise have stumbled across.
 
So @Mendalla - your thread title and BPotW abbreviation piqued my curiosity. In reading through the thread, I wondered about some other bits leading up to the passage quoted - so I went back & started Samuel at chapter one. Quite the adventure novel! There's a bit everything in there. I'm just at chpt 13 - taking a break to enjoy today's sunshine. Thanks for the prompt to read something I would not otherwise have stumbled across.
As I think I already commented, you could probably get a Biblical "Game of Thrones" out of 1 & 2 Samuel and 1 & 2 Kings. The stories of the kingdom period are pretty good stuff.

Next week's BPotW is already written and also from 1 Samuel.
 
Redbaron ---you said ----Verse 15 says specifically Samuel spoke. Whether you care to believe it or not, that's what the text says.

LOL -----Not surprised you say that Redbaron -----so stay with what you see and believe ------that is your right ----

It is my right to see and believe different than you -----and I do ---so that is that --------
 
You realize, of course, you're arguing with the text of 1 Samuel 28:15, and not with me, right? The text says what it says. But, hey, it's a free world. Read into the plainly-worded text whatever fantasy you want to find there.

Oh, and by the way, LOL at you, too.
 
LOL -------Again that is your perception ---your entitled to it --

And then there is this ------God would have had to allow the medium to raise Samuel-----and that would put God in hypocrisy ------which is ridiculous to even think ----God making a law that says your not suppose to seek out these people and then doing what He made a law against allowing this medium to conjour up His faithful servant just to tell Saul he was going to die -------

God doesn't need a medium to raise Samuel ----He could have done that Himself as He did with Moses and Elijah when Jesus was transfigured on the mountain ------ God refused to answer Saul -----

As Joe Biden would say ----Come On Man ------you want to be right so bad ----your grasping at straws ------shows how little you know God and His character --
 
Talk to 1 Samuel, not to me. The text says what it says.
You want to grasp at your straws of fantasy, you go right ahead and do so.
 
'Game of Thrones?' I'm seeing a 'Throne Wars' movie franchise, replete with sequels and prequels.
 
Redbaron -----you said ----Talk to 1 Samuel, not to me.

Now there is a cop out statement for you -------

You said ------The text says what it says.

Well ---that is what you say cause you just see what you see ------

But here is what you are missing ---there is a second sight ----and it comes by way of the Holy Spirit who gives the person a deeper Spiritual insight of what the Logos presents ------Many heard the words Jesus said but few were able to grasp the real Spiritual insight behind the words He said ----Jesus said --you see but you do not see -----you hear but you do not hear ---


Posting this from ----read all yourselves

Spiritual Insight
—The true second sight​

A word occasionally used in the Bible is "Behold". Beholding is not merely seeing. It is seeing with an intensity and insight that goes beyond a mere physical processing of light entering the eye.
 
@unsafe what do you see verse 15 as saying and meaning? Every Translation I have looked at (NRSV, KJV, JPS, JB, NIV, one I think might be a Douay translation which actually calls the book 1 Kings [of 4 books named Kings] ) says that Samuel spoke. They do not say that "the medium said "hear what Samuel says". They do not say "the figure Saul though was Samuel". They say that Samuel spoke. SO how do you read and understand that verse?
 
I think that the fact that the Jews were given a command not to work through mediums was not instruction that it didn't work, but that psychically, it was maybe not a good idea.

You notice that even Saul tried the "God approach" (prayer, listening for God, etc.) first, to no avail.

And even his experience with talking to Samuel reinforces God's instructions, because he gets no useful advice, only bad news, and now he's made a major prophet grumpy for dragging him from sleep.

I'm not sure what level of adding stuff into the text is required to have Saul "not" speaking to Samuel, but rather someone who looks like Samuel, answers to Samuel's name, sounds like Samuel, etc. A duck, as it were.

Your claim, my dear unsafe, that your interpretation is always correct because you have the correct Spirit, has the rest of us saying, "Well, but it sounds like a duck". You're not God, and we don't think so. You can insist for yourself, on a literal translation, but then it's not cricket to say, "except when my special Spirit says it's not literal". From that sort of approach are cults born.
 
I think that the fact that the Jews were given a command not to work through mediums was not instruction that it didn't work, but that psychically, it was maybe not a good idea.
I would agree. If it didn't work, God likely wouldn't have bothered with making such a harsh law. But clearly there is something there and it is dangerous in the eyes of God.
 
GordW ------I agree that it says Samuel Spoke ------it definitely says that -------

That does not mean that it was the real Samuel ---it does not say that it was ---and it does not say that it wasn't ------sometimes God leave us hanging to our own devices ---what it does say is this spirit was angry and Samuel would be in a place of comfort with Abraham and other Saints -----also God let a demon plaque Saul so he was already in a bad state ------and if you read the scripture ----the spirit seems to appears before the medium does anything -----the scripture does not say how she brought the spirit up ---again we are left to own own devices to understand that -----Saul says bring up Samuel and in verse 12 he appears she has done nothing yet ----- 11 Then the woman asked, “Whom shall I bring up for you?”
Bring up Samuel,” he said.
12 When the woman saw Samuel,


Posting this​

Where was Abraham’s Bosom?​


Abraham’s Bosom was located “down below” the heavens in the depths of the earth. Jesus referred to it as the “heart of the earth and it was the abode of the righteous dead prior to Jesus’ resurrection.

What was Abraham’s Bosom?​

Abraham’s Bosom was a place of comfort and it was a place of waiting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I say ------So for me it is not the real Samuel -----if it is for you that is the way you see it ---you can take it as you see it ----

And I am not alone in my thinking ------

1 Samuel 28:15​

And Samuel said to Saul, why hast thou disquieted me to bring
me up
?
&c.] This makes it a clear case that this was not the true Samuel; his soul was at rest in Abraham's bosom, in the state of bliss and happiness in heaven, and it was not in the power of men and devils to disquiet it; nor would he have talked of his being brought up, but rather of his coming down, had it been really he; much less would he have acknowledged that he was brought up by Saul, by means of a witch, and through the help of the devil:

and Saul answered, I am sore distressed;
in mind, being in great straits and difficulties, pressed hard upon by men, and forsaken of God, as follows:

for the Philistines make war against me;
so they had many times, and he had been victorious, and had no reason to be so much distressed, if that was all: but he adds,

and God is departed from me:
and therefore he feared he should be left to fall into their hands; and that he had forsaken him he concluded from hence,

and answereth me no more, neither by prophets, nor by dreams:
(See Gill on 1 Samuel 28:6); he makes no mention of Urim, either because they were not with him to inquire by, being carried away by Abiathar when he fled to David, ( 1 Samuel 23:9 ) ; or, as the Jews say F8, through shame, he said nothing of the Urim before Samuel, as he took this appearance to be, because he had slain the priests at Nob, and because of this shame, they say, his sin was forgiven him:

therefore have I called thee, that thou mayest make known unto me what
I shall do
;
which was downright madness and folly to imagine, that since God had forsaken him, and would give him no answer, that a prophet of his should take his part; or when he could get no answer from a prophet of God on earth, that he could expect an agreeable one from one fetched down from heaven: one would be tempted to think that he himself believed it was the devil he was talking to, and whom he had called for under the name of Samuel, and expected to see; for from whom else could he expect advice, when he was forsaken of God, and his prophets?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read all here I am just posting this part below ----


Commentaries:
Forerunner Commentary​

These three factors provide the background for the story in I Samuel 28: God is always against those who practice sorcery; Satan and his demons can appear as ministers of righteousness; and Saul himself, emotionally unbalanced, was predisposed to the sway of a demon. Knowing these things makes all the difference in how we understand the events at En Dor.

Richard T. Ritenbaugh
What Happened at En Dor?
 
Where exactly does it say that God himself condemns witchcraft? I know men are keen to call a woman who appears to have some odd behaviours or appears different.... to be a witch.
We are all familiar with Salem where no witches were burned.
In Jewish history witchcraft was considered learned sorcery for men and folk magic supposedly was practiced by woman. It was considered mostly done by woman but yet some rabbis would use incantations and rituals that possibly appeared similar ......with potions and healing rituals. Yet they were allowed.
And I believe originally she was called the woman of Endor....not " the witch".
Am I detecting a prejudice against women here?
 
Also does Saul actually see Samuel because he has to ask the woman what she sees? The words he hears from Samuel may be from her lips?
It sort of sounds like Sylvia brown talking to someone about someone they know.
 
Where exactly does it say that God himself condemns witchcraft? I know men are keen to call a woman who appears to have some odd behaviours or appears different.... to be a witch.
We are all familiar with Salem where no witches were burned.
In Jewish history witchcraft was considered learned sorcery for men and folk magic supposedly was practiced by woman. It was considered mostly done by woman but yet some rabbis would use incantations and rituals that possibly appeared similar ......with potions and healing rituals. Yet they were allowed.
And I believe originally she was called the woman of Endor....not " the witch".
Am I detecting a prejudice against women here?
As pointed out, most modern translations, eg. NRSV, use "medium" not "witch" which is a more accurate description of her role. This suggests that the word used in Hebrew is probably not one that means "witch" in the sense that we think of a witch.
 
As pointed out, most modern translations, eg. NRSV, use "medium" not "witch" which is a more accurate description of her role. This suggests that the word used in Hebrew is probably not one that means "witch" in the sense that we think of a witch.
Yet you used it in the title of this thread. I'm just wondering why women seem to be singled out as the perpetrators of evil yet the men not so much.
 
Yet you used it in the title of this thread.
Because that is how the story is commonly known. And I put medium first and discussed the whole matter of witch vs. medium in my first post, which I thought you had read based on earlier posts.
 
Is a psychic medium bewitching to those that believe not in the existence of a bright Sol ... a solution that will dissolve the problem of superficiality? Literally it is right on the surface as attribute ... no depth!

Yet we are directed in the belief of myths being layered and deep ... frequently denied by those that won't go anywhere like that ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top