The Christian Downfall ---The Error Of Balaam

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Socrates is asked about writing. Will it be an aid to human being? Socrates suspects it will be more of a hindrance. Why? Folk will read and think they know, because they can talk (type) about what they have read. All without living consistent with the implication of things read and rehearsed.

Further, Socrates suspects the habit of reading will render memory increasingly deficient. I see this as the fall from oral to textual consciousness; the dissolution of communion and the onset of alienation. What the evidence will demonstrate once the pertinent data is gathered in. The printing press enslaved while it promised liberation. Our immersion in this technological milieu takes the matter one quantum step along its trajectory.

Thinking outside the theological box, letters are dead when they are contradicted by practice. A living letter is pronounced where word and deed are congruent and no where else.

Lots of talk in Babylon. Not much communion.

George
 
What I was just trying to point out when you wrote this

Is that it looked like to me you were being antagonistic there

Which I couldn't grok, because blackbelt was being all understanding and really positive...

Glad we all could come together to try to help with the communication difficulties
I admit my "whatever" comment may have been a touch agnostic, but it was after his "serpent" comment. I felt I was being baited, could be my bad.


So I apologize Blackbelt, but I would like to continue this "parley", as Jack Sparrow would say. I'll respond to your other post.
 
I admit my "whatever" comment may have been a touch agnostic, but it was after his "serpent" comment. I felt I was being baited, could be my bad.


So I apologize Blackbelt, but I would like to continue this "parley", as Jack Sparrow would say. I'll respond to your other post.

no apologie need my friend, im sure you noticed sometimes i lose it too, but thank you
 
Inannawhimsey said:
Glad we all could come together to try to help with the communication difficulties
A worthy enterprise, this coming together to help with... communication!
 
Neo said:
The bible is full of "dead letters". Imagine if everyone lived, to the letter, according to the Book of Deuteronomy?
...yes imagine if everyone did live to the letter, if the letters were dead there would be no crazy world according to Deuteronomy , the very reason why the world would be crazy as you say is because the word is active effecting the minds , soul and spirit of the reader.

and that is exactly why the law is not dead but kills because when we read the 10 commandments we begin see that we are all guilty of some of them and it kills our spirit and effects our minds and soul. Because the readers of the Law were so affected they began to look to God To save them
I'm not sure what you're saying here, the laws of the Bible kills our spirit with guilt??

Anyways, I wasn't thinking of the 10 commandments when I mentioned the Book of Deuteronomy above, I was thinking more about little gems like the following. Imagine if everyone adhered to the Bible "to the letter" when it comes to stuff like this:
The Book of Deuteronomy 22:13-21 said:
If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then turns against her, and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and says, ‘I took this woman, but when I came near her, I did not find her a virgin,’ then the girl’s father and her mother shall take and bring out the evidence of the girl’s virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. "And the girl’s father shall say to the elders, ‘I gave my daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; and behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter’s virginity.’ And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the city. "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him, and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give it to the girl’s father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel. And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days. "But if this charge is true, that the girl was not found a virgin, then they shall bring out the girl to the doorway of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death because she has committed an act of folly in Israel, by playing the harlot in her father’s house; thus you shall purge the evil from among you.
 
I'm not sure what you're saying here, the laws of the Bible kills our spirit with guilt??

Anyways, I wasn't thinking of the 10 commandments when I mentioned the Book of Deuteronomy above, I was thinking more about little gems like the following. Imagine if everyone adhered to the Bible "to the letter" when it comes to stuff like this:

But if, for better or worse, one is so taken with this "little gem" that one chooses to obey it to "the letter," then that "little gem" cannot be composed of "dead letters" because by convincing someone to live by "the letter" they have demonstrated that they are very much alive.

The problem, which many of the prophets and Jesus himself noted, is that people became fixated with the letter of the Law and forgot the spirit of the Law. Ritualistic obedience to the Law became more important than living out the faith to which the Law pointed. The prophets regularly pointed out that God hated ritualistic obedience to the Law if the people ritualistically obeying the Law didn't also allow their hearts to be touched and their lives to be transformed, and Jesus, of course, seems to have established (certainly to my satisfaction) that for all its sometimes seeming harshness and for all its sometimes seemingly inane obsession with detail the Law, properly understood, points us to love: love for God, love for neighbours, love for one another, love even for enemies. Thus, even Jesus saw the words pointing to a deeper reality with the potential to transform us. Admittedly, sometimes the transformation is for the better and sometimes it's for the worse and sometimes there's no transformation, but that's a reflection more of the heart and soul of the one who engages the word, not of the word (or the letters) itself. The letters are not dead, they just sometimes go unheard.
 
Neo,,,,,

But if, for better or worse, one is so taken with this "little gem" that one chooses to obey it to "the letter," then that "little gem" cannot be composed of "dead letters" because by convincing someone to live by "the letter" they have demonstrated that they are very much alive.
.


ditto
 
Scripture will aways prove itself ---it is man who needs to have the right way of thinking to understand the true meaning behind the scripture -----there is Logos and then there is Rhema --
  1. Rhema—The Spoken Word. The second primary Greek word that describesScripture is rhema, which refers to a word that is spoken and means“an utterance.” Arhemais a verse or portion of Scripture that the Holy Spirit brings to our attention with application to a current situation or need for direction.

Cain brought friut that was not excepted by God ----just because it does not spell out the words you all want to see means nothing -----the scripture clearly states that it was rejected by God -----that is proven ---now ask yourself why and go back to scripture to get your answer ----Genesis 3:21 gives you your answer and proof but because you are looking for the words faith and sacrifice you miss the proof ----you are so wrapped up in the words you miss the spiritual understanding ------- you can believe that I am a false teacher if you like ---I really don't care God is my source for judgment not any of you ------I know for me that what I say is right and you can say I am wrong and want proof all you want -----you haven't given me any reason to think am wrong in what I have said and I stick by the knowledge of what the scripture says spititually ----so if you are waithing for the words faith and sacrifice in that scripture you will not see them ---but that doesn't mean that the scripture doesn't include them in what it says ------by the word rejected which is what God did to Cain's offering we get this From Strong's ----



Strong's Concordance
atheteó: to do away with what has been laid down, set aside
Original Word:ἀθετέω
Part of Speech:Verb
Transliteration:atheteó
Phonetic Spelling:(ath-et-eh'-o)
Short Definition:I annul
Definition:I annul, make of no effect, set aside, ignore, slight; I break faith with.

HELPS Word-studies
114athetéō(literally,a-thetos, "un-place") – properly,do away with; reject what is already laid down; toset aside(disregard as spurious); nullify, make void; to break faith (Abbott-Smith); remove out of an appointed (proper) place, i.e. reject as invalid; refuse to respect (even "despise"); to cancel, disannul, abrogate (passive, "be set aside" because perceived to lack value); to disregard, pass over (refuse to acknowledge).

Think like God Not Carnal ----

For those intrested in learning the difference -----

http://thebiblestudy.co.uk/talks/god-man-thinking.php

God's Thinking vs Man's Thinking

But the real question is how are we thinking? Are we thinking like man or are we thinking like God? Of course, that’s if it’s even possible to think like the creator of the heavens and the earth!
As always we will be using our Bibles to find the answers to our questions, because that’s where God reveals his mind to us.
For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.(Isa 55:8-9)

I’d like you to keep this passage in our minds as we look at our topic. It’s pretty clear that our thoughts are on a completely different plane to God’s, there is this huge gulf between us and God, we naturally think differently to God, but why is that? How is our thinking different to God’s thinking?

Understanding this concept is one of the most important things we can do in our lives because it will naturally lead us in the right direction.

As often the case, the best place to start looking for answers is at the beginning. Turn your Bible to Genesis 3, where we read of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, who were given one commandment by God which was to not eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

So we have God’s way of thinking, and this snakelike way of thinking, and there is this battle between the two. Man naturally will think like the serpent, not like God. Paul uses this symbol and describes it as carnal thinking, our word carnal is derived from the Latin word for flesh. It’s this kind of animal thinking that man will naturally tend towards; an animal thinks of not much more than reproducing, where its next meal will come from, and perhaps some play; if you have pets like cats or dogs you’ll understand.
That also pretty much sums up some humans, but God has made mankind differently because he has given them the ability to rise above basic animal thoughts and lift up our minds to higher things. God has given us the ability to think on spiritual things, the things that God wants us to consider, and there is the difference, this natural desire to think like an animal but with the ability to overcome that natural fleshly way of thinking. How do we even start to overcome our natural thinking though? It does come naturally to us after all. Paul wrote of that very problem.


This is a great description of the battle that goes on within our own bodies, the natural thinking of man at war with the thinking of God. If we let the mind of God enter into our lives then it will begin to push out the things that we naturally want to do. We have to understand that God’s ways are very different to our own natural ways and the ways of God won’t just happen within us because they are simply not in our nature.

We see a good illustration of the two types of thinking in Genesis 4 and the example of Cain and Abel.

In the course of time Cain brought to the LORD an offering of the fruit of the ground, and Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat portions. And the LORD had regard for Abel and his offering, but for Cain and his offering he had no regard. So Cain was very angry, and his face fell.(Gen 4:3-5)

To understand why God liked Abel’s offering but not Cain’s we have to go back a chapter.

And the LORD God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them.(Gen 3:21)

God made coats of animal skins for Adam and Eve, God was showing man how he wanted worship to be done and what was acceptable to him, and this was even mentioned in the New Testament even though it happened thousands of years before.

By faith Abel offered to God a more acceptable sacrifice than Cain, through which he was commended as righteous, God commending him by accepting his gifts. And through his faith, though he died, he still speaks.(Heb 11:4)

Here God is telling us that there is a specific way to come to him, and that was through the sacrifice of animals, until the sacrifice of Christ that is, which was the perfect sacrifice once and for all. Abel applies that godly thinking and presents God with an acceptable sacrifice; while Cain does what he thinks is best and applies his human thinking. We then see a graphic example of the enmity that exists between the two types of thinking, with Cain rising up and slaying his brother.

This is my last Post on this ---you can believe what you want to ---it does not affect my reading of the scripture about Cain --Nor does it affect my Posting on this sight ----I will post --up to each one to ignore or read -----

Peace to all

Cain did not bring his offering in Faith nor did he bring the right offering to God ----and get this --God did not ask Cain and Able to bring any offering to Him at that time --they brought it on their own to worship ----it was not commanded by God -----
 
So, when you can't demonstrate from Scripture that what you say is true, suddenly it becomes a "spiritual understanding" that no one can question? Of course, a "spiritual understanding" is an interpretation. And if someone does question it, it's because they're worldly minded? Perhaps you've just been misled by a spirit other than the Holy Spirit? But you can't even consider that. As for me, the Holy Spirit is telling me that you are a false teacher. I continue to declare you to be such. And it's fascinating that you're now essentially conceding that you can't back your position up with Scripture, so you fall back on this "spiritual understanding" and essentially declare it off limits to being questioned or to possibly being wreng. Your understanding of Scripture may well be what you say - but it is your understanding, and a "spiritual understanding" is by its very nature subjective and therefore subject to error. That's no shame, but your arrogance and pride (serious spiritual blocks) prevent you from even considering the possibility of error. And, of course, when anyone else takes a position that can't be clearly and directly demonstrated from Scripture, you denounce them as worldly-minded, or some other such thing. You need to learn to sit back and listen and learn, unsafe. You don't know it all and you're definitely subject to error.

Now, Genesis 3:21:
The LORD God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them.

That really has no direct connection to the offerings made by Cain and Abel.

It's another nice try at a diversion though. It just doesn't work. Everyone - except perhaps airclean - sees through your false teachings by now.
 
Everyone - except perhaps airclean - sees through your false teachings by now.

Actually, if I may be honest, I suspect a fair number of us have tuned out the whole conversation at this point. It was apparent from the get go (and past experience with unsafe and ac) that you weren't going to get a clear answer.
 
unsafe - just to be clear - are you saying that you're receiving direct - special revelation from God?
 
Actually, if I may be honest, I suspect a fair number of us have tuned out the whole conversation at this point. It was apparent from the get go (and past experience with unsafe and ac) that you weren't going to get a clear answer.
-- I myself see Unsafe gave a very clean post on why, and how she sees vers and chapter.That you or RevJohn or Rev sdd--Disagree is just the way you see it.--airclean33
 
Hi Revsdd-- You post---
Now, Genesis 3:21:
The LORD God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them.
That really has no direct connection to the offerings made by Cain and Abel.

AIRCEAN--Ha Ha-- So you take it GOD talk the animals out of there skins?
Ofcourse this had nothing to do with Cain and Abel. They were just the children of the Mother and Father to Cain and Abel . As well as of sin death in the world. --aircleanee33
 
Actually, if I may be honest, I suspect a fair number of us have tuned out the whole conversation at this point. It was apparent from the get go (and past experience with unsafe and ac) that you weren't going to get a clear answer.

You may be totally honest. Pay attention or not is no concern of mine. Unsafe makes claims that she can't back up, I'm gonna call her on it whether others tune out or not.
 
-- I myself see Unsafe gave a very clean post on why, and how she sees vers and chapter.That you or RevJohn or Rev sdd--Disagree is just the way you see it.--airclean33

Which, of course, is my point, airclean. It's how she sees it. Which, I note, she has acknowledged. So she now agrees that Scripture does not explicitly say what she claims Scripture said. It's now what she "sees" through "spiritual understanding" - which is a fancy way of saying that it's how she interprets the text.
 
revsdd - I hope that you continue to call her out on her false claims and her efforts to put down any other interpretation but her own. She got away with that for too long on WC without carrying it over to this site.
 
Hi Revsdd-- You post---
Now, Genesis 3:21:
The LORD God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them.
That really has no direct connection to the offerings made by Cain and Abel.

AIRCEAN--Ha Ha-- So you take it GOD talk the animals out of there skins?
Ofcourse this had nothing to do with Cain and Abel. They were just the children of the Mother and Father to Cain and Abel . As well as of sin death in the world. --aircleanee33
which does not change the fact that the verse quoted says NOTHING about offering sacrifices, or about what kind is better, or about Cain v. Abel. For all we know the animals died of natural causes before being skinned. Or they were simply hunted. OR maybe they were the earliest residents of a slaughter house....
 
Back
Top