Jaebius
The Arianism -Debate ------was that Jesus was a created being and not equal to God the Father ----
According to this ------It was condemned at the Council of Nicaea (325 AD), which affirmed that Jesus is "of the same substance" (homoousios) as the Father.
The Nestorianism Debate --was about how Jesus divine and human Nature coexisted ---it said that Jesus was 2 distinct persons ----not one person with 2 natures -----
According to this ----It was condemned at the Council of Ephesus (431 AD).
The Filioque Debate -----the origin of the Holy Spirit -----
From Wikipeda
Filioque is a Latin phrase meaning "and the Son" (from filius, meaning "son," and -que, a Latin enclitic conjunction meaning "and"
Western Church added this phrase to the Nicene Creed to state that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son.
The Eastern Church strongly rejected this, arguing that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone.
I say -----Scripture confirms that -----The Father is sending the Holy Spirit -----Not the Father and the Son -----
John 14:26
“But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have told you.”
John 15:26
When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me." (ESV
From Bible Hub
Triadic Structure Underscoring the Trinity
1. “The Father” — sender and source
2. “The Holy Spirit” — personal agent sent
3. “In My [Jesus’] name” — authority and sphere of mission
Three distinct referents cooperate in a single redemptive action. The verse thus offers a snapshot of one God in three persons:
the Father commissioning,
the Son authorizing,
the Spirit acting.