Meanwhile in Canada

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

What site is that from? By posting a snip rather than a link, you've obscured your source. Because news content most certainly can be viewed in Canada, just not on social networks that don't want to compensate rights holders and journalists who report it. Any Canadian news site will be just fine.
 
In Star Wars ... is there a stellar flash point where all becomes raw and brewing as a flash point ... critical thing?

Stand back when viewing because too close is Like Cloes enigma ... meltdown from internalization ... the heat goes on ... Like Cinderella ... an epic oracle!

Things are stated in that myth that are generally not digested ... observe and don't do it ...

It is ineffable write in down as a delinquent order ... dissention? Expect laws to be made on LSD and its effects ... lucidity? Its clear ... pagan or he-then command ... that's olde or classic like 2 out of 3 ... will ET sell out ?

RFK declares he will not run in 28 and thus indicating something else in in the wind ... mores lie! Then there is Morley on Tuesdays ... back-up from Wednesday the medium ... so chaotic ... as to be a mess ... the myths evolving are insane ... sobeit! Like "256" a bit ... adds up to 13 ...
 
Last edited:
Yeah, there's actually some good science supporting safe injection sites as part of a broader program of treatment.
Scientists and journalists who raised concerns about “safe supply” were gaslit and vilified, and in my case, forced by the provincial government to destroy evidence, abandon approved research, and release scientists conducting critical work that threatened the government’s agenda.

Far worse, the denials and attacks gave the province more time to expand “safe supply,” allowing harms to metastasize.

At last, in early 2025, a leaked government report acknowledged what elected and public officials had long denied – the safe supply program was not only causing widespread harms, but those harms had been deliberately concealed.

 
Safe injection isn't safe supply.

I think when addressing addiction, there are only partial interventions at best. Improvements of policy seem to invite "two forward, one back" results. In Portugal when they decriminalized street drugs, there were fairly decent improvements in some areas. Overdose deaths decreased dramatically, as did AIDS cases. But since a few years ago, there was an uptick in actual drug use and social impacts of open drug use. That's where safe injection sites come in. At least in part, it provides a bit of safety all round. There is healthcare staffing, food, and showers there often too. Addiction is an existential and persistent human predicament. Nothing can be done reliably, although many get free. It's a perfect storm of trauma, poverty, exploitation and ignorance. They are the "poor" of our times. Ubiquitous...always with us, and will likely always be. I believe those who can, should be supported to stay in a stable life and off the street even if that means doctor-monitored prescription drug maintenance.
 
Research conducted in Canada and elsewhere has demonstrated the feasibility, effectiveness, and cost savings
associated with recovery-oriented housing.

So, expanding effective services that promote agency and human dignity rather than giving homeless people more drugs.
 
You grabbed that before I edited.

Politically neutral/ non policy wonk question: if you were an unhoused person today, addicted to drugs living on a downtown street, you could die from excruciating withdrawal or from toxic supply, what would you do if there was no voluntary treatment bed to go to?

Maybe the federal government should declassify some drugs and legally make them available enough to keep people alive. They could do that tomorrow. And they could also start creating voluntary treatment centres tomorrow and implement a bridging program connected to safe injection sites, to catch up by 2027. I don’t know if that’s exactly the right answer. Something that helps not harms people needs to happen, but as long as conservatives balk about tax payer money going to drug users, it won’t.
 
Last edited:
Edited: never mind. I don’t want to get into an argument about this.
I asked you first
Before I would know I would have to be in that situation which I am not.

Have you tried asking anyone in that situation what they do?

Do you go out of your way to talk to people that you are advocating for or do you go out of your way to avoid them?

 
You’re the one who posted that article lamenting tax payer money going toward helping drug users.

FIFA is coming to a city near you - do you think your taxpayer money is going to be used to help drug users or for "beautification zones" around venues and enforcing the displacement of drug users and homeless encampments to less visible areas?
 
Back
Top