Delightful Life
M&M, Cascadian Lovers
- Pronouns
- She/Her/Her
"He knows too much, he's dangerous!" we all have read or heard that line.![]()
Humanity is dangerous and I wouldn't have it any other way :3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"He knows too much, he's dangerous!" we all have read or heard that line.![]()
Teaching people that being smart is dangerous, is dangerous. It's not about smart being dangerous, IMO, but about what purpose knowledge is employed to accomplish that can be dangerous. Ignorance can be equally, or more, dangerous.
"Against ignorance, even the gods fight in vain."
-Goethe
The trouble with knowledge is that it is relative ignorance. Of all there is to know, those of us who feign ourselves knowledgeable know only a small fraction, and those of us who are ignorant a slightly smaller fraction.
Moreover, analytical knowledge, by its very nature, is fragmentary. If, as I believe, ultimate reality is a unified whole in a state of synthesis, then no analysis can grasp this wholistic Truth. Then the holy whole, as it really is, can only be experienced, and is being experienced, in the pure, undifferentiated, unfragmented, non-conceptualized and unanalyzed experience.
This does not render logical analysis untrue. It merely makes analysis a secondary truth, subordinate to the synthesis, which is the ultimate Truth.
The TAO that can be told is not the TAO.
-Lao Tsu
Our knowledge is fragmentary, and our prophecies are fragmentation.
But when that which is perfect has come, then the fragmentation will end.
1Cor13:9,10 (Luther Version)
Yes. We are all ignorant in the big picture. What I meant is I think it's dangerous to be 'taught' not to learn. For example, the idea that women were not as smart as men and incapable of learning certain things prevailed for a long time. Therefore women weren't taught or encouraged to pursue knowledge about things it was assumed were out of their league or not appropriate for them to know. When you have an elite intelligentsia and a deliberate 'dumbing down' of large segments of the populace that's dangerous.
![]()
We do not have an "elite intelligentsia" dumbing down the population. The best and brightest are trying to teach, not hoard knowledge. Politicians want to muzzle government scientists and economists who don't agree with them. Increasingly, they're getting away with it.
As far as women are concerned, I think girls are more tied to a positive future than boys are. We need to free young women from being breeders. We need to get them an education, as a fundamental human right. There's my "fundamentalist" side - I want all kids to receive their fundamental right. We need strong women to balance out the aggressiveness and impetuousness of young men.
I'll also note that where girls are not getting an education, or are not getting a good education or the same education as boys, religion is front-and-centre.
The visible "Christian Right" are fighting against same sex marriage, abortion and birth control, and for guns. Imagine if that energy and money could be refocused to fighting for health care, food shelter, and education for all.
Now in the Persiflage Bigtop Venn Diagrams of knowledge!
Visit the Corporate Ring
![]()
The cynical ring!
![]()
The Mythbusters Ring!
![]()
The Engineer Ring!
![]()
The Sexual Ring!
![]()
[source: google image search]
Well, Inna, we are not only terrestrial but also cosmic beings. We, as a terrestrial species, will eventually be wiped out. But we, the Cosmos of eternal energy, are forever, or outside of time. Thank God, eh?![]()
Being a few molecules of significant cosmic energy when dead would certainly be preferable to being nothing.
August 3, 1859. Were you concerned aboot not being alive/relevant/significant then? Are you concerned now? Why or why not?
Being a few molecules of significant cosmic energy when dead would certainly be preferable to being nothing.
:3Since I'm not a time traveller (that I know of), don't know what I felt then (1859), but today I am but one small speck in the sands of time. Am I concerned....not particularly.