If Trump Croaks While He Is Still POTUS

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Carney or any other leader can’t do anything without procuring technology products and services owned by uber rich people. They are who run the world. And that is a consequence of libertarianism - which overtime monopolized everything in the name of their own freedom to utilize the free market and make more money than it’s humanly possible for a person to spend - nowadays skews so far to the right that human rights - and people who stand up for them, and against fascism - have been cast off as a bother.

You’re loathe to admit that the seed of the problem is actually libertarian anarchy. Look up accelerationism.
 
You’re loathe to admit that the seed of the problem is actually
And You’re loathe to admit that the seed of the problem is actually manifesting in real time and labeling it as somehow my fault does not change the outcome.

What do you suggest should happen to actually restore universal human rights?
 
And You’re loathe to admit that the seed of the problem is actually manifesting in real time and labeling it as somehow my fault does not change the outcome.

What do you suggest should happen to actually restore universal human rights?
You didn’t start it but the numbers in your camp who don’t realize it make it difficult to change.
 
And You’re loathe to admit that the seed of the problem is actually manifesting in real time and labeling it as somehow my fault does not change the outcome.

What do you suggest should happen to actually restore universal human rights?
Not dismantling liberal education that teaches people about human rights, and encourages critical thinking that challenges oppression would be a start.
 
And You’re loathe to admit that the seed of the problem is actually manifesting in real time and labeling it as somehow my fault does not change the outcome.

What do you suggest should happen to actually restore universal human rights?
Actually I copied this and was about to say: looks like where we’re at.

The intersection: libertarian anarchy accelerationism
  • A shared belief in intensifying capitalism:
    A right-wing libertarian accelerationist would agree with the libertarian idea of reducing government but would take it further by arguing this could accelerate capitalism to such a degree that it creates a breaking point, leading to radical transformation.

  • Technological focus:
    Both philosophies are interested in technology, though with different aims. The libertarian-accelerationist focus is on technology as a driver of production and potentially a replacement for human labor, as the process of capitalism is "liberated" from human desire and constraint.

  • Radical outcomes:
    The ultimate goal is not to improve the existing system but to radically change it. For some, this means an accelerated free market leading to the "liberation of the means of production". For others, it can involve using accelerationist rhetoric to justify violent actions to hasten societal collapse.
 
Do you consider Carney as a technofascist?
No, Rita, but you're a conspiracy theorist and you may have conned a couple of people that you're not Rita and your babbling is having absolutely zero effect on this place.
 
Last edited:
Is Carney not an uberrich person.?
We have no idea. If you search, you can find everything from $6-7 million to hundreds of millions. None of which is "uberrich" in my books in a world where we have hundreds of people with net assets in the billions. But our politicians' net worth is not a matter of public record so it's all estimates at best and often wild speculation with political motives. A good piece by CBC on the problem of using the web or AI to find this information. Short version is, we don't know and can't know short of him disclosing. Ditto Poilievre. Anything you read online is suspect.

 
Do you consider Carney as a technofascist?
No. Just a guy who’s an economist who can only please some of the people some of the time while he works to get the mouse’s tale (that’s Canada) out from under the foot of a mad elephant. And no, I do not like several of his policies - including aspects of MAiD that federal conservatives helped (they did and a disabled MP was used to do it then they turned the tables) to bring in initially, and liberal politicians ran away with. He didn’t start that but I don’t see efforts by him to stop it.
 
Last edited:
Anything you read online is suspect.
Sorting the signal from the noise is difficult to say the least.

The noise machine's primary goal seems to be to highjack the nervous system.

All narratives are probabilities not certainties.
 
Is the world getting crazier or is it just the stupidity creep making off with the experience of thought?

Some will not do that ... they just follow the indoctrinated protocol! It is like a leash or rein ... to get beyond that?

There's the enigma ... life is a puzzle ... "to be or to naught?" Entanglement ...
 
Oh Geez I've infringed on a science subject on a faith thread!

In a field of misinformation could such info and intelligence drift into darker unseen parts?

Truth vs misinformation? Who tries hardest at beating the system: CEO's, lawmakers or believers in the stuff cranked out ... all without adequate info ... hidden intel? Like Babe in the dark forest ... grand base for a story of childish games of screwing about with folk ... life is made for it ... and there you goes ... like does e' do' ... barn dances, etc. Vanity, hubris and all that's outstanding ... it's humiliating what folk do under the force!

Is it because they don't know? Mores to look inTU ... chilling the fires! Screwing around in any dimension has cost over runs ...

Formation of tribes and sects is a complex order ... it can fold over and collapse on itself ... like stones on a slope!
 
Truth vs misinformation? Who tries hardest at beating the system

Three interlocking systems now execute domestic information warfare:

  1. Production: Military contractors like Leidos and Palantir develop "public diplomacy" content through subsidiaries like the Countering Foreign Propaganda Office.
  2. Distribution: Social media platforms' "trusted partner" programs (Meta's ThreatExchange, Twitter's Partner Support Portal) provide backchannel access for government narratives.
  3. Validation: University-based "disinformation labs" (Stanford Internet Observatory, UW's Center for an Informed Public) lend academic legitimacy to state messaging.
This ecosystem operationalizes what French philosopher Foucault called "regimes of truth"—structures that determine which ideas are permissible in public discourse.

The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act and the Weaponization of Information: How U.S. Propaganda Was Turned Inward
 
As in a government shut down?

Just watch the effect of total authority ... even God warned about this development ... but humanity suffered the 3 monkey syndrome; "don't look, don't listen, say nothing"!

Thus nothing developed ... and extended ... unbelievable eh?

As a sideline ... can space be defined, or is it just an empty topic? It seems there is a controversy over how to deal with it at the WH! Musky ...
 
Who is this coalition? They seem to be a fringe organization. Who is finding them?
It appears to be a front for conservatives. There is no.information about the member companies. The only people I saw identifies with them on their website was Poillievre and premiers Smith, Moe and Higgs.

Once again, more astroturfing than grassroots.
 
Back
Top