Howzit

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Mendalla said:
That's hardly a factor. Look how many Roman and Greek statues there are of mythological figures or semi-legendary figures. Even the busts we have of Homer owe more to traditions about him than any reality. And his existence is open to question as well given the nature of the texts (recorded oral traditions) attributed to him. Statues of Jesus appear once he becomes important. That's what matters more than his reality or lack thereof.
Click to expand...
But we have contemporary images from which to model statues. They existed, and we have ample evidence. We don't have that evidence for Jesus, so everyone depicts him as they want him to look.
 
WhyCzar said:
Howzit that there are realistic statues and busks of Aristotle, Alexander the great and Julius Ceasar but not of a realistic Jesus?
Click to expand...
Becauze it wazn't God'z will that there be such a statue of Jesus. The Lord came to be remembered for Hiz Word, cross and rezurrection. Not for what He exactly looked like
 
Mendalla said:
...We have also, right or wrongly, believed that maintaining Canadian voices in the media is important to counteract the very loud voices coming from South of us...
Click to expand...
And I guess it'z this that I'm really questioning. I mean, if the Canadian stuff is good it should be strong enough to make it on itz own, without the government backing. I can recall working as a radio announcer and having to spin a certain amount of Can Con each shift. Some of it waz good, sure, but some waz being spun just to hit the percentage target
 
chansen said:
Those guys all existed.
Click to expand...

Now they are non existent ... and echoes are still heard about them ... coming from know where? Thus no where formed up ... Noah? Someone declared no way ... and folk didn't know how ... are many de lighted and in the dark pulling strings?

Will J'Zus bouncing off stone cause reflection, or doth reflection cause an inner light as the comprehension sinks into the dark? Th process being only partly absorbed ... and some ad sorption ... like word ... a sector can only take so much and they create something with it ... some hard some fluid ... just how it goes ... I can't tell you as I don't know but there are some that try ... trying over and over ... until forming a hard line that maybe lionized ... el (the) On type about to come off the rails?

Thus the bust as they fly ... this is all in the head man ... projected ...
 
Last edited:
Howzit that American tariffs are just a tax on the American consumer but Canadian retaliatory tariffs are are described as necessary to protect Canadian industries and workers?
1f644.svg
 
WhyCzar said:
Howzit that American tariffs are just a tax on the American consumer but Canadian retaliatory tariffs are are described as necessary to protect Canadian industries and workers?
1f644.svg
Click to expand...
Because both are true and you just need to find an angle to attack Carney again.

Sure, they're a tax on Canadians. But we don't have a winning choice at the moment, so we choose not to lie down and capitulate. Which, I suspect, is what Poilievre would have done. Which would set us back for decades as we wouldn't get any concessions again for years as other administration's would not just hand back the ill gotten gains.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top