Ritafee
Is Being Human
Makes sense that if you are pro war you would be pro gun ... as long as you are killing people in another country right.By trained military in a designated war zone, largely outside of one's country.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Makes sense that if you are pro war you would be pro gun ... as long as you are killing people in another country right.By trained military in a designated war zone, largely outside of one's country.
I am perpetually amazed at how so many people say they are not pro war but then go ahead and justify military force. If you support the military having better weapons for war ... how is that not being pro war?Yes, and 1,5, 6 more tightly controlled than 2,3,4, basically long guns. That's supposed to be the way it works, anyway.
(P.S. I am not "pro war", Rita, but if you have a country with a military force, of any kind, you're going to expect something a little better than a rifle and a canoe, lol...)
Which, I thought you were against. You were years ago, regarding sending troops to the Middle East. You schooled me because I felt that some defence of innocent lives was required and that some of the montersously violent behaving perpetrators - including young Canadian men joining them - were not going to just clear out if asked nicely...I was pondering whether military was necessary or not, and you told me to use my Christian imagination for thinking of peaceful solutions.It is impossible to be part of any sort of world military alliance without a military org of some sort. Canada is a little large to be Tobago, lol.
Until it got out of fashion, the usual Canadian motto was peacekeeping. Now it seems to be a bit more, "help-giving"It is actually terribly beautiful that their most recent use was eldercare.
This is a joke thread. That’s not even trying to be funny. Maybe you have the wrong thread?“The Covid virus knows no political affiliation,” Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease expert at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, told the New York Times.
I would respectfully disagree with the good doctor. In fact, I’d go so far as to suggest that the medical community is aware that deadly little viruses can make moralistic judgment calls – very much like liberals today – with regards to what groups deserve to be attacked and which do not.
Indeed, it seems this incredibly adroit, liberal friendly bug understands the difference between a morally outstanding protest, aimed at “white supremacy”, and a political rally headed by the most loathed US leader to enter the White House in many years – in the most consequential elections to come along in many decades.
Nothing else can explain the medical authorities’ inconsistency on the matter. Perhaps, under the microscope, it is even possible to observe that the coronavirus is a card-carrying member of the Democratic Party.
Reprinted with permission from RT.
Conspiracies, What are They? Rita's idea of a joke it seems.Moved both posts to a (I hope) more appropriate thread.
I won't bother to quote the rest of your propagandized script.An anti-racist should understand the difference between taking a risk for a human rights protest outdoors, and attending a rally for a ...
It was sarcasm from the writer, who was defending Trump's fascist rally and putting down the blm protests. You didn't pick that up? It's not funny. It's also propaganda for Trump, in the state owned Russian media that gets picked up on here. It's Russian media specifically for appealing to Western audiences. It's Putin's Fox News channel that he uses when he wants to, to manipulate Americans.Conspiracies, What are They? Rita's idea of a joke it seems.
I won't bother to quote the rest of your propagandized script.
Seriously ... the alleged 'deadly little viruses can make moralistic judgment calls with regards to what groups deserve to be attacked and which do not.' ?
That has got to be a joke!
And you call me a conspiracy nutIt was sarcasm from the writer, who was defending Trump's fascist rally and putting down the blm protests. You didn't pick that up? It's not funny. It's also propaganda for Trump, in the state owned Russian media that gets picked up on here. It's Russian media specifically for appealing to Western audiences. It's Putin's Fox News channel that he uses when he wants to, to manipulate Americans.
Who owns RT @Ritafee? And can’t you see the anti-liberal bias that’s clearly articulated in the article? Why would a Russian state owned media organization want to present an anti-liberal/ dem bias @Ritafee? It’s not hidden knowledge that they are state owned or that they have an anti-dem bias. It’s not made up. So, right before an election one has to ask “why”? It may be wrong that US media companies have political biases - but in a country that has always been extra polarized it makes sense that each side in a US election would be fighting for their turf in the media. But why is Russian media (the two countries have long been rivals for ideological and economic power even after the Cold War supposedly ended - and both are corrupt) getting so involved?It was sarcasm from the writer, who was defending Trump's fascist rally and putting down the blm protests. You didn't pick that up? It's not funny. It's also propaganda for Trump, in the state owned Russian media that gets picked up on here. It's Russian media specifically for appealing to Western audiences. It's Putin's Fox News channel that he uses when he wants to, to manipulate Americans.