Ritafee
Is Being Human
Why ... because I have to assume that nobody else read the article that you posted and that I linked it to as well?Rita, you really should get in the habit of marking text as quotes as you quote.
So you posted the article ... I quoted from the article ... you and I seem to be the only ones interested in the article and that may have read the article ... so how about the portion that I quoted? The context of it ... do you agree with the context or disagree?
I agree with the article ... specifically ... we are not served well by:
- assuming that anyone perceived to not be in agreement has bad intentions, is immoral, and deserves to be attacked,
- assuming that shame and punishments like banning presenters from speaking, having professors fired, or engaging in physical intimidation or violence are the best or only ways to bring about justice
- being vague or so broad in defining and applying important terms like racism, trauma, oppression, and injustice that just about any word or act might fit with the definition,
- assuming that a preferred theory about these terms is correct without formulating it in a way that allows it to be tested or revised if needed,
- assuming that if an idea offends us or makes us uncomfortable, it can automatically be completely rejected
- demanding conformity through heavy policing of language and ideas.
How did my discussion around mandatory vaccination as a logical outcome of this 'pandemic' as all the evidence - not theory about the evidence - shows that the goals and objectives .... as openly stated and being acted on by Bill & Melinda Gates 'foundations' and ... now being echoed loud and clear by almost all 'world leaders' ... get relegated to 'Conspiracy Theory' that needs to be policed and censored to conform with the 'status quo' of 'vaccination at all costs as the final solution' ?