Conspiracies, What Are They ?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

I don't distinguish between left or right or sources the way you do.

Again labeling ... my sources are derogatory ... yours are not? What is the context of the information ... not who or where it came from ... should be the criteria for evaluation of that context. That some of the people that I find credible are not always allowed on mainstream media does not negate their 'knowledge'. What is the agenda that I am parroting?
You don’t seem to be able to parse out fact from fiction very well either. You readily believe some sources that ooze so many lies it makes my hair stand up.
 
I don't distinguish between left or right or sources the way you do.

Again labeling ... my sources are derogatory ... yours are not? What is the context of the information ... not who or where it came from ... should be the criteria for evaluation of that context. That some of the people that I find credible are not always allowed on mainstream media does not negate their 'knowledge'. What is the agenda that I am parroting?
For instance: money=speech - began on the left, or the right? Start there.
 
For instance: money=speech - began on the left, or the right? Start there.
Money talks? Follow the money? Is the Federal Reserve Left or Right. Is the Usury system Left or Right. Are the Billionaires Left or Right. Are the impoverished Left or Right? Class struggles ... Left or Right?
 
Money talks? Follow the money? Is the Federal Reserve Left or Right. Is the Usury system Left or Right. Are the Billionaires Left or Right. Are the impoverished Left or Right? Class struggles ... Left or Right?
Mostly, the worst of it is a result of the political right wing mucking up what could be a good thing and not cooperating, out of greed and bigotry...leading scores of people to the belief that it’s about freedom, when it isn’t.
 
You sure do seem to. As long as they mention freedom and the new world order, your ears perk up.

Again ... you are wrongly implying that I am not aware that 'with freedom comes responsibility'.

As for the honorary mentions of the new world order and pricking up of ears ...

Adolf Hitler:

National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order.

Pope John Paul II :
By the end of this decade we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations ... a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of human survival. One world government is inevitable.

David Rockefeller:
The world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.

This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.

Nelson Rockefeller:
As President, I would work toward international creation of a new world order.

George H. W. Bush:
We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders.

George W. Bush:
The war in Iraq is a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times a new world order can emerge.

Henry A. Kissinger:
[The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change it's perceptions.

Peter Hoagland:
Fundamental, Bible believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one-world global society and their children will not fit in.

Carroll Quigley:
The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.

Curtis Bean Dall:
The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.

Richard A. Falk:
The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species.

H.G. Wells:
It is the system of nationalist individualism that has to go....We are living in the end of the sovereign states....In the great struggle to evoke a Westernized World Socialism, contemporary governments may vanish....Countless people...will hate the new world order....and will die protesting against it.

Henry Ford:
The one aim of these financiers is world control by the creation of inextinguishable debts.

Larry McDonald:
The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.

Brock Chisholm:
To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men, their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas.

Mikhail Gorbachev:
Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.

George McGovern:
I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court.

Herman Goring:
Naturally, the common people don't want war ... but after all it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.

I can find 100's more of these 'random order' quotes but as J. Edgar Hoover said:

The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.

:eek:

Last but not least ...

There will never be a new world order until women are a part of it. - Alice Paul

:eek::eek: Jose Manuel Rodgiguez Delgado:
We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. ... The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective. Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electronically control the brain. Someday armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.
 
No voting?

Everything I do voluntarily is my vote, in the part of the world where I live.
So not voting in elections from your municipal level, up, is your choice to opt out of deciding what happens to the world’s resources, then.

UN delegations who put ideas on the table are formed by regular people from around the globe. Nations, including their governments at all levels, can opt in or not, to listening to those collective voices being brought forward. People do vote on who, what party or leader, is raising those collective concerns -or not - and honouring, or not, the voices brought forward when resolutions are made by the UN. Sometimes, those collective voices lead to common law precedents that favour those most vulnerable in the world...that’s why the UN Charter exists. It’s all voluntary participation, and starts at the grassroots level...so what’s your problem? Those who corrupted it, dishonoured it, or ignored it, come from the money=speech camp.
 
Last edited:
So not voting in elections from your municipal level, up, is your choice to opt out of deciding what happens to the world’s resources, then.

UN delegations who put ideas on the table are formed by regular people from around the globe. Nations, including their governments at all levels, can opt in or not, to listening to those collective voices being brought forward. People do vote on who is raising those collective concerns -or not - and honouring, or not, the voices brought forward when resolutions are made by the UN.
Did you vote? Did you get what you voted for?

I talk to my closest neighbors ... most of them voted ... none of them got what they voted for to hear them talk about it but yet we all work well together ... in spite of the 'government' making everything 10 x more difficult for us to do than it should ever have to be.

So are you telling me that the UN then is just there as a prop? So Agenda 2030 is just a work of fiction ... just a bunch of ordinary people volunteering to get together and pretend that they have any influence on world order.

Silly me ... I thought I was supposed to take their Agenda seriously.
 
Back
Top