Another Lulu From Luke: The Unjust Judge (Luke 18: 1-8)

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

I think it's almost an inescapable conclusion. Jesus is clearing drawing a parallel between Godde and the Judge (Unjust).
To me, it comes across as a contrast, rather than a parallel. Like the times Jesus said, 'What parent among you, if your kid asks for bread, will give the kid a stone?' Something like that, maybe.
 
Still seems to me like an odd way for Jesus to teach about prayer. But he did have a way of telling a memorable story, didn't he?
 
Could you say it was diabolical how the parables went right over the heads of the following predators? Resultant hyperbole??? Twisted grammar in the way of gamma ... representation of the Greek shadow all a quiver over Plato's statement about the item on the wall. It didn't go down well as nothing of the sort of what they expected ... monsters! The fire from the very thing (pits) eradicated the silhouette ... the effect of the psyche of these folk was distinctly indeterminate number as part of the notorious 7! Eclectic sign of the great flash ... vast occult of obscurity in which powers could corrupt unseen ... thus words by mortal gods ... mostly about war ... ponder it. Is that not what mortal god pursue in great esteem of being a winner?

It seems to be the way ... the route out for collapsing nations searching our economic wealth instead of the common, heathen, pagan forms ... before they mellow beyond peak Ephraim! That's an old word for epinephrine ... steroidal stimuli ... bringing on a stigmata for ends ... the cranking is thus on ... like the Wind Lass ... and anchor 'a ... it comes in ... perhaps with some resistance and friction ... all an act?
Gamma
Zero (OH o_O)
Difference --- Omaha ... GOD!​
MOG ... just the surrounding essence as miasma ... ending up in a great stink being stirred up ... and then they were gone ... indefinitely! As Blake stated men go down to this ... Mariah? What the wind brings one never knows ... some believe they can beat it ... but if you can't see it is it oblivious bringing oblivion to the former expectations ... such is the definition of incarnate (appearing not as perceived)! Thus fallacy of intelligence, given all that was missing because thee powers didn't wish to know any more! Result; nothing to it, genetic constructs of unconscious nature ... just piece a bone, hair of an angel and lips as ... you know the whine!

The hob does have a type of draw ... and then the animation starts ... alternate cabals (that's a story ... conspired)?
 
Last edited:
Back to the unjust judge for a minute. I have to believe this detail was included for a reason.

I was taking a look at another of Luke's unique and quirky little stories. Luke 19: 1-10 (Zacchaeus and Jesus.)

This is the one about the short little guy who climbs a Sycamore Tree to see Jesus going by. He happens to be a tax collector who decides to mend his ways.

The lessons from this story seem obvious enough but why a short little man? Why did he climb a tree? Why a Sycamore Tree? I can't believe these details are unimportant.

Thinking about this passage for a BPoTW thread soon
 
Sycamore trees are sweet ... there is even a novel about white folk hanging folk of color in these trees ... why? It'll be the death of me that curiosity ...

Never, never question what goes on in the dark state the darker authorities as they flare! Thus differentiating passionate breakout and desires from lessor reason ... the downs? These may be graphical ... check out Dunne Kruger ... for such Ares ... there the literature gets deeper ... except for the concept of adept ... these too are out and about ...
 
Have you never said to anybody something like, "If so and so will do something, for sure another person will also do it?" ToTo me this was always a simple story about persistence in prayer and other faith actions with the judge who did not care what other people thought thrown in for emphasis. I thought I posted this yesterday. Forgot to click on Post reply.

Regarding Zacchaeus, in the English translations it is not clear that he is the one that was short. It might have been Jesus. As for it being a Sycamore tree, not all trees are easily climbed. Also details help the overall story to be memorable. If I said I saw an eagle in a tree, that would not be as memorable as saying I saw a Bald Eagle in an oak tree. Details that help form a picture in our minds help us remember.

One of the negative outcomes of Biblical criticism to me is attention to details that distract from the core message. Zacchaeus was a typical tax collector who collected more than was required for his personal gain. He did not feel right about his life which prompted him to make an extra effort to see Jesus. His experience of Jesus transformed him. His story has several messages for the community of the author of the Gospel of Luke. No one is outside the bounds of salvation or the community of followers of the Way. Transformation is available to anyone through an experience of Jesus. Getting to experience Jesus is worth an extra effort. With his reputation, it would have been dangerous for him to be in the middle of the crowd or try to push his way to the front. There is also the element of taking personal responsibility for solving one's problems.
 
Have you never said to anybody something like, "If so and so will do something, for sure another person will also do it?" ToTo me this was always a simple story about persistence in prayer and other faith actions with the judge who did not care what other people thought thrown in for emphasis. I thought I posted this yesterday. Forgot to click on Post reply.

Regarding Zacchaeus, in the English translations it is not clear that he is the one that was short. It might have been Jesus. As for it being a Sycamore tree, not all trees are easily climbed. Also details help the overall story to be memorable. If I said I saw an eagle in a tree, that would not be as memorable as saying I saw a Bald Eagle in an oak tree. Details that help form a picture in our minds help us remember.

One of the negative outcomes of Biblical criticism to me is attention to details that distract from the core message. Zacchaeus was a typical tax collector who collected more than was required for his personal gain. He did not feel right about his life which prompted him to make an extra effort to see Jesus. His experience of Jesus transformed him. His story has several messages for the community of the author of the Gospel of Luke. No one is outside the bounds of salvation or the community of followers of the Way. Transformation is available to anyone through an experience of Jesus. Getting to experience Jesus is worth an extra effort. With his reputation, it would have been dangerous for him to be in the middle of the crowd or try to push his way to the front. There is also the element of taking personal responsibility for solving one's problems.

Sounds to me like Oh din in the tree ... wisp Eire of a breeze of light nature ... beginnings of conscience ... a revelation?

Tyranny does not like such things exposed ... thus shades and shadows ... beneath the trees a place to digest eM! The Hebrews had a great concept for "M" ... it went beyond the Judean who was more entranced by law ... something also to get around ...

But a grand place to set a watchman ... at high noon the shadow is minimalized ...
 
Yes I think persistence in prayer is the point being made here. But If the character of the judge is just a distraction, why mention it at all?
It is a story-teller's hook. It is the packaging that wraps the message not the message itself.

Jesus could have very simply said, "be persistent in prayer." The very next question would be, "Why should I be persistent in prayer?" The hook is a set up to draw folk in to the parable. An unjust judge is probably not an unheard of entity. Sort of like the concept of corrupt politician or ambulance chasing lawyer.

As soon as one hears unjust judge ears prick for the sound of comeuppance.

And the woman prevails.

Why?

Because she persists.

An unjust judge would be a formidable obstacle.

Jesus repeats the lesson from Luke 11: 5-8 changing the characters while retaining the point.

John
 
It is a story-teller's hook. It is the packaging that wraps the message not the message itself.

Jesus could have very simply said, "be persistent in prayer." The very next question would be, "Why should I be persistent in prayer?" The hook is a set up to draw folk in to the parable. An unjust judge is probably not an unheard of entity. Sort of like the concept of corrupt politician or ambulance chasing lawyer.

As soon as one hears unjust judge ears prick for the sound of comeuppance.

And the woman prevails.

Why?

Because she persists.

An unjust judge would be a formidable obstacle.

Jesus repeats the lesson from Luke 11: 5-8 changing the characters while retaining the point.

John

Wise woman in complexity ... sophisticated from the Archons! Thus the shot as "phi" from lower Sophia ... ground effect ... lift? Misunderstood often enough as denser Eire ... Celtic prescience? Perpetual movements ... browns off the pious who see things cutting one way ... that one snake item ... alternate to Ka Duce Ess. Æs cu la, or even as kewed ... all wend out of form!

Strange to mortals ... you bet ... Out of the Question and into the Mystery is a great read on divine and scattered Belief Systems ... and various initiates ... often found in the black ... Moeh Amid ... inky or in quis?

The Quis of escape ... stories that take M eis to the edge ... des wett! There a lodge ...
 
Last edited:
Agreed, on two counts. Firstly, I don't think there are a lot of unnecessary words in the bible, so I'm uncomfortable just ignoring a bit, and secondly, and sorta related, it definitely casts aspersions on the character of Godde.
The words aren't unnecessary. They are the storyteller's hook.

Nowhere does Jesus suggest that the unjust judge plays the role of God. Jesus, is pretty obvious when he is working allegorically. "The kingdom of heaven is like . . ."

If Jesus had said that God is like an unjust judge the comparison would be valid.
 
The words aren't unnecessary. They are the storyteller's hook.

Nowhere does Jesus suggest that the unjust judge plays the role of God. Jesus, is pretty obvious when he is working allegorically. "The kingdom of heaven is like . . ."

If Jesus had said that God is like an unjust judge the comparison would be valid.

Cabalist ...
 
What is the outside of a cabal but relation-ist?

Many just eliminate portions of everything that is God in black and white and poly misunderstood ... more to dig into with the winds of .. Baskervilles ide ... basket cases after being Stoe da lone without instructions ... source of Uncle Tom's item ... then the Stele away ... discrete sects? The underground indicating a hard place in de hollow earth law ... you know! Gotta be something in there ... thus archeology ... Archons?

Thus the initiation of those without a clue ... up starts? Further cables ... thin lines, threads, etc. ready for the spin ... wobbly?

What did Poly do ... further repetition ... as the bird NU we know nothing to start with ... thus desire for Kraken ... all for show in pirated myths ...

As Shakespeare stated about what's in word ... something else as it amounts to everything ... much mist to mortals in nebulous states ... like moon on a cloudy black screen ... abstract is due ... psyche blasts ... bang! and there it went! Variants ... cause valence and Valentinians ... that's something else again ...

One has to love the mystery that en Sous ... all in the tres ... virtue? Bushed ... Lo RT restes ...
 
Last edited:
It is a story-teller's hook. It is the packaging that wraps the message not the message itself.

Jesus could have very simply said, "be persistent in prayer." The very next question would be, "Why should I be persistent in prayer?" The hook is a set up to draw folk in to the parable. An unjust judge is probably not an unheard of entity. Sort of like the concept of corrupt politician or ambulance chasing lawyer.

As soon as one hears unjust judge ears prick for the sound of comeuppance.

And the woman prevails.

Why?

Because she persists.

An unjust judge would be a formidable obstacle.

Jesus repeats the lesson from Luke 11: 5-8 changing the characters while retaining the point.

John
Not sure I agree with this, to me most stories are embellished for a reason.
 
Not sure I agree with this, to me most stories are embellished for a reason.
As one who tells stories, I would say that stories are embellished for a reason, but that reason may not relate to the main plot or theme. Sometimes little details are added just for colour or to make the characters more relatable without adding to the overall plot or theme. You can read too much into the details sometimes, in other words.

That said, Jesus' parables tend to be short and on point, so I can't really see him adding details just for colour. Of course, that assumes the parables are all written down as told and not embellished by the writers or those they heard them from (since none of the Gospel writers were present when Jesus told them).
 
Are brutal stories embellished some way ... for psychopathic reason?

Maybe the new norm as you watch present media ... it is emotional in a negative way ... to increase stress?

I'll go for the classic literary perspective ... like why so much brutality ... the kind causing PTSD! Ponder it ...
 
Back
Top