Oh, I'm aware that there are people who have never heard of Jesus - but I'm not sure there are many who haven't been effected by Jesus in some way.
Yes, there are people who do not comprehend language - but their lives also may have been effected by Jesus (or the attitudes and/or actions of people who believe in Jesus).
Thinking something is meaningless, doesn't make it meaningless.
There is a possibility that Jesus never existed, but does that make him meaningless? Santa Claus never existed either, but Santa Claus is not meaningless to much of North America, Europe, and some other parts of the world - he is part of story, legend, childhood fantasy. And he has a big effect on commerce and the economy. He has shaped our buying habits - made December the most important month in the retail world. Existence, or non-existence, doesn't make something meaningless.
When you write aboot Jesus' influences as above, you are making a
choice as to what influences are...I don't know exactly how to phrase this, but are his copyright? Not in the legal sense, but in the identity sense.
And you are also making a
choice to follow in your particular culture's BS (belief system) that effects can be attributed to singular causes (which includes human beings). So we have such things as heroines -- people who somehow act by themselves and who, ex nihilo, create new causes...
One of humanity's issues, I think, and I think this is in the Hebrew Bibble is that we tend to deify things. We can place them in a special spot, elevating them above reproach. Making them sacred while forgetting their other aspects.
I'm glad you can think of your Jesus in more than one way. I'm glad you are also willing to let your fellow human being also have more than one conception of Jesus.
And yes, personally, I think that saying Jesus/g_d 'existed' or didn't exist misses the whole point...it takes the deep myth, metaphor, analogies and sucks all the life and meaning out of them...myths are our food...we need them in order to believe the important things, like mercy, justice, beauty...
And aboot you or I saying anything aboot a particular group, whether that be 'humans' or 'Canadians' or 'Seeler's Spawn', without actual scientific-level investigations (which are the collective & hard-won knowledge of humanity), all we can say fairly aboot any group is aboot some-but-not-all. So sombunall Canadians are pacifist cheeze eaters. Sombunall Americans are gun nuts. Sombunall women are easily squicked. And so forth.
There is a big problem with the word 'is' -- it takes all of wonderful, complex, marvelously variable & changeable reality and cuts it, mauls it, fossilizes it...when reality is really 'it seems to be at this time under these conditions'...
Thank you for illustrating and engaging with the collective of WC :3