It would be so much better if you actually engaged in discussion rather than bludgeoning us with information that in some cases is not accurate. You'd be surprised to learn that more of us agree with much of what you say than disagree.
It’s been rarely inaccurate and people can see that now, I know you can. Overall, I’ve been quite accurate about the MAiD trajectory. And I’ve self corrected my inaccuracies as best I can.
What I’m saying is I want everyone to have the same care and choices you have in the healthcare system and that’s not the case for increasingly more people. And I’m not bludgeoning anyone with information as much as I am being a broken record. I put the information out there - usually from acceptable sources - so people can see “this is really happening” because to be frank, people are asleep on this topic, have always been, and the news is slow to report on it. When they do it gets quick mention before they move on. And so I try keep the ball in the air with some mainstream folks (sorry if you don’t like that characterization but I think it’s socioeconomically and politically true) who I’ve known for awhile who have followed this topic with me, who know in retrospect that most of these concerns turned out to be valid - in hopes that you will not turn away from it and your social connections and word of mouth can make a small difference. It’s better than nothing. Everywhere concerns get talked about, work is being done. And hopefully all the combined efforts move the needle a bit.
It’s one strategy, while getting it in the news is another. I tried but I don’t have the clout (doesn’t mean I’m not intelligent but I don’t have clout, like many disabled people who get dismissed. Our lives matter anyway. Try having ADHD with the added pressure of communicating like you don’t) - even disabled people and their representatives with clout and PhD’s and honours have trouble getting the facts and stats about problems with MAiD policy into the mainstream news - and people have since, after being persistent and having some clout, covered most of what I wanted to say anyway. The mainstream public gave it their 5 minutes, maybe. That’s hardly my fault. If I’m not communicating it the way that’s most comfortable for everyone and that is a deterrent for people here from caring about many thousands of lives - I really don’t think the problem is with me.
Also, be aware that some of these concerns written about in articles could be very accurate (and some might not be) if you fact check them, end up in places I don’t think are wise to publish them at, out of desperation to get information out there. It doesn’t necessarily mean it’s not true so just be aware of that and fact check where they’re getting their info from before dismissing it, if you can. It should be getting more mainstream traction but never has.