Northwind
Stationary nomad.
- Pronouns
- She/Her/Her
How many are relieved the flood of PP ads seems to be declining? They were so ironic. A guy who dwells in back rooms walking across a field with his wife.
Ah yes the warm and fuzzy ads. What crap.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many are relieved the flood of PP ads seems to be declining? They were so ironic. A guy who dwells in back rooms walking across a field with his wife.
You've made a positive truth claim, Redbaron, (that she (at 15 years of age) is there to work). The burden of proving that claim is on youI would certainly prefer that my tax dollars be spent to help Trudeau's daughter travel with him, rather than spend them so Mr. Trump can play golf at his own clubs twice a week, with all the Secret Service protection going with him, in hideously expensive rented golf carts, with much of that money going into Mr. Trump's pocket.
And you have provided no evidence to the contrary.
The last line in the article visible to me says that Trudeau's daughter was travelling with him. No mention of why, or what she would be doing. No mention of where the finances were coming from. The article stops at that point; you went on to raise issues NO ONE ELSE mentioned, making the proverbial federal case out of one-- count 'em-- ONE statement on the very last line of the article.You've made a positive truth claim, Redbaron, (that she (at 15 years of age) is there to work). The burden of proving that claim is on you
i) housing affordability; focus on "rent geared to income"
iv) all benefit payments tied to cost of living
Agree, Hopefully we learned from what we watched south of the border, and politicians focus on what the needs of the average Canadians are.To me, the issues to be addressed by federal policies leading up to next election:
i) housing affordability; focus on "rent geared to income"
ii) climate amelioration, including doing our world share as we may be less affected than others
iii) the inclusion of dental care and pharma care into the Health Care Act
iv) all benefit payments tied to cost of living
v) completion and prioritization of the Calls to Action promised by our government vis a vis our indigenous neighbours in the TRC report.
Not terribly interested in who of his immediate family Trudeau might take on a very educational trip to a world summit. It's a pitiful day when this is the best that PP (always in my mind as PeePee) can conjure in the way of policy argument.
Agree, Hopefully we learned from what we watched south of the border, and politicians focus on what the needs of the average Canadians are.
If something's wrong, Redbaron, then it's wrong. Even if only one person on the whole planet notices. Hey, even if no one noticed.The last line in the article visible to me says that Trudeau's daughter was travelling with him. No mention of why, or what she would be doing. No mention of where the finances were coming from. The article stops at that point; you went on to raise issues NO ONE ELSE mentioned, making the proverbial federal case out of one-- count 'em-- ONE statement on the very last line of the article.
Frankly if there is any burden of proof, it's on your shoulders. You seem to be the only one worked up about this.
Maybe you should seek out other sources to find facts to back up your claims of how much (if any) govt. money was spent. So far you have shown nothing.
Do not bother replying to he who can believe something that makes no sense to anyone else.Back up your allegations with some factual evidence. One line at the tail end of an article is NOT evidence.
Also, when Jesus spoke alone, he actually knew what he was talking about.
My list includes UBI in place of OAS, GST and Carbon rebates. Taxpayers should not pay a nickel towards private developers building their equity. Taxpayer money should go into public housing and non profit housing such as co-ops.To me, the issues to be addressed by federal policies leading up to next election:
i) housing affordability; focus on "rent geared to income"
ii) climate amelioration, including doing our world share as we may be less affected than others
iii) the inclusion of dental care and pharma care into the Health Care Act
iv) all benefit payments tied to cost of living
v) completion and prioritization of the Calls to Action promised by our government vis a vis our indigenous neighbours in the TRC report.
Not terribly interested in who of his immediate family Trudeau might take on a very educational trip to a world summit. It's a pitiful day when this is the best that PP (always in my mind as PeePee) can conjure in the way of policy argument.
Oh come on, a campaign fought on actual issues? Slagging and making half-baked accusations against your opponent is far more fun, isn't it?To me, the issues to be addressed by federal policies leading up to next election:
i) housing affordability; focus on "rent geared to income"
ii) climate amelioration, including doing our world share as we may be less affected than others
iii) the inclusion of dental care and pharma care into the Health Care Act
iv) all benefit payments tied to cost of living
v) completion and prioritization of the Calls to Action promised by our government vis a vis our indigenous neighbours in the TRC report.
Not terribly interested in who of his immediate family Trudeau might take on a very educational trip to a world summit. It's a pitiful day when this is the best that PP (always in my mind as PeePee) can conjure in the way of policy argument.
And who is going to build it? Are you going to turn the government into an actual developer? I don't see that going well at all given the government's record on large scale projects (remember, they couldn't even pay their employees properly for a while). And even if you do, then the big construction contractors like Ellis Don are going to reap the benefits. There's no way the government is going to go into the contracting business nor should they.Taxpayer money should go into public housing and non profit housing such as co-ops.
Oh, to @BetteTheRed's Canada Health Act bullet, I would add a comprehensive national program for mental health.But, yeah, my platform might look something like that, too.
Canada built social housing every year for decades. Smaller projects are probably better projects. Municipalities and non profits should be managing the building.And who is going to build it? Are you going to turn the government into an actual developer? I don't see that going well at all given the government's record on large scale projects (remember, they couldn't even pay their employees properly for a while). And even if you do, then the big construction contractors like Ellis Don are going to reap the benefits. There's no way the government is going to go into the contracting business nor should they.
To give you an idea of what that market is like, the construction market in London was so tight a few years ago due to shortages in the skilled trades and othe factors that my employer's parent company gave up on building a new complex to house them and my employer's head office due to escalating costs and uncertain timelines. They actually own land to build on behind one of their other operations, but getting someone to actually build it was going to be a challenge.
At least if the government works with developers, the developer is dealing with the contracting and eating some of that cost. That relationship needs to be more carefully managed and controlled from the government side, though, esp. with regard to conflicts of interest (e.g. developers with ties to the premier here in Ontario).
See, the Liberals are threatening to turn into the Democrats of Canada. Lots of good ideas coming from the floor but Trudeau and his campaign officials won't run on them. Instead, they'll fearmonger and cast aspersions on the Conservatives, thinking they can win by default. Look at how well that went for Kamala in the US.I had an interesting discussion with a Liberal supporter on Facebook. He attended the Liberal policy conference. They voted for establishing a framework for UBI. One comment that was repeated was that they needed to put this forward to give voters a reason to vote for the Liberals.