GENESIS: Snoopy's Short & Snappy Review

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Well, if we are following Revelation, there's still pestilence to go. Epidemics and pandemics are as old as civilization after all. :giggle: (But I don't recall Abram ever encountering one, though I was blissfully unaware of his Alexander-like military prowess as well).
 
This story establishes that Abram has God on his side. He is a force to be reckoned with. Is this the most important aspect of the story?
God definitely was with Abraham no question in my mind ------

For me the important aspect of the Story is ----with God all things are possible -----and making decisions based solely on external appearances like Lot did seeing the path to Sodom as a good move just because there was water -----this move almost cost him his life -----his bad decision came back to bite him in the Butt -----as it does with us today -----

Genesis 13:10

New International Version
Lot looked around and saw that the whole plain of the Jordan toward Zoar was well watered, like the garden of the LORD, like the land of Egypt. (This was before the LORD destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah.)
 
The adage "Look before you leap" comes to mind. I thought it might be biblical but it is generally attributed to Aesop.
 
Good morning. Here is Genesis 15:

Snoopy's Snappy Review: Gruesome tale today. :sick:


Today's story involves the covenant between God and Abram and it gets a little gruesome. Don't say Snoopy didn't warn you.

God promises Abram he will have an heir and his descendants will be as many as the stars. Abram believes God and God declares him righteous.

God instructs him to get a heifer, a goat, a ram, a pigeon and a dove. Abram cuts the animals in two and places the halves across from each other. The birds are left intact. When the birds of prey arrive for the carcasses, Abram chases them away.

God tells Abram that his descendants will be enslaved and oppressed in a foreign country for 400 years. But they will return in the fourth generation.

After dark, a flaming torch passes between the animal parts. God covenants with Abram that the land will belong to his descendants.
 
Seems bizarre, right? Apparently this procedure with the animal parts is a thing that will be explained in Leviticus. Between two people, it's roughly the equivalent of shaking on a deal. The two people walk through the animal halves which are set out across from each other.

Just been reflecting that I was already familiar with the descendants being as numerous as the stars. But I had never heard the story about cutting animals in two. I looked it up and it appears in the lectionary once per cycle
 
Verses 7-8

7 The Lord said[v] to him, “I am the Lord[w] who brought you out from Ur of the Chaldeans[x] to give you this land to possess.”

8 But[y] Abram[z] said, “O Sovereign Lord,[aa] by what[ab] can I know that I am to possess it?”


So we see here Abraham asking for a sign -----and God then cuts a covenant with Abraham by telling him to do this ===Notice there are 2 birds mentioned so they did not have to be cut ---

9 The Lord[ac] said to him, “Take for me a heifer, a goat, and a ram, each three years old, along with a dove and a young pigeon.”
10 Abram brought all these to him, cut them in two and arranged the halves opposite each other; the birds, however, he did not cut in half.

11 Then birds of prey came down on the carcasses, but Abram drove them away.

Looking at it Spiritually ----my view

The three years here is important because the number 3 symbolizes completeness --- maturity -----these animals were mature in stature ----

Cutting them in half and arranging them opposite to each other symbolizes a 2 party covenant ----it also symbolizes a Blood Covenant was made as Blood had to be shed from the animals being cut in half ----this would be a serious covenant in my view where the 2 parties are bound by the shed blood ----maybe also symbolizing the New Covenant of Grace which was to come ??

Verse 11 ----symbolizing the foes of Israel who will come against them ----and Abraham driving them away show his faith and relationship with God -----


These verses are in the future ---12-16

This is a future vision that Abraham has when he is asleep From God describing --when the Israelites will be taken as slaves in Egypt ----and God rescues them and bring them out with all their Possessions ------even telling Abraham that he will go to his ancestors in peace and be buried at a good old age -----

12 When the sun went down, Abram fell sound asleep,[ag] and great terror overwhelmed him.[ah]

13 Then the Lord said to Abram, “Know for certain[ai] that your descendants will be strangers[aj] in a foreign country.[ak] They will be enslaved and oppressed[al] for 400 years.

14 But I will execute judgment on the nation that they will serve.[am] Afterward they will come out with many possessions.

15 But as for you,[an] you will go to your ancestors[ao] in peace and be buried at a good old age.[ap]

16 In the fourth generation[aq] your descendants[ar] will return here, for the sin of the Amorites has not yet reached its limit.”[as]


If you do your research --the Amorites along with others occupied Canaan area and they were a wicked people and God was waiting for them to reach their full limit of sinful deeds before He word drive these people from the land he was promising to Abraham and ----Abraham's descendants ----

verse

17 When the sun had gone down and it was dark, a smoking firepot with a flaming torch[at] passed between the animal parts.[au]

18 That day the Lord made a covenant[av] with Abram: “To your descendants I give[aw] this land, from the river of Egypt[ax] to the great river, the Euphrates River—

19 the land[ay] of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, 20 Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, 21 Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites, and Jebusites.”[az]


verse 17

7 When the sun had gone down and it was dark, a smoking firepot with a flaming torch[at] passed between the animal parts.[au]

The fire passing between the animal parts -----Fire represents the presents of God -----so God was sealing the covenant with Abraham -----


Fire: A Symbol of God's Presence
Jump to: Nave'sLibrarySubtopicsResources
Nave's Topical Index
Genesis 15:17
And it came to pass, that, when the sun went down, and it was dark, behold a smoking furnace, and a burning lamp that passed between those pieces.
 
All of these stories were passed from generation to generation as oral stories. I wonder if Abram was the story teller or if someone else on his camp had that responsibility. Who might have been witnesses to the covenant? The Book of Genesis that we have was created by priests and scholars in Babylon from older documents. The story of the covenant must have had special meaning for them.
 
Good morning! Here is Genesis 16.

Snoopy's Snappy Review: New life! :)


Serai asks Abram to take her Egyptian servant, Hagar, as his wife (concubine?) so that he will be able to have an heir.

When Hagar becomes pregnant, she begins to resent Serai.The animosity between the two women continues. No surprise, right? Abram tries to stay out of it.

An angel of the Lord comes to Hagar and tells her she will have a son. His name will be Ishmael. He will be a wild donkey of a man and will live apart from his brothers. He will be hostile to others and they will be hostile to him.

Tradition has it that Ishmael is the ancestor of the prophet Muhammad in Islam.
 
What do you make of this "wild donkey of a man" statement? What an odd expression!

It sounds like he will be a cantankerous loner, doesn't it? Does it mean anything else?
 
What do you make of this "wild donkey of a man" statement? What an odd expression!

It sounds like he will be a cantankerous loner, doesn't it? Does it mean anything else?
The Quran says Ishmael (Ismail?) was a patient, good and righteous man.
Ismail is considered an ancestor of Mohammed and son of Ibrahim.
It seems donkey doesn't apply to him in Islam.
 
Tradition has it that Ishmael is the ancestor of the prophet Muhammad in Islam.
Hence the term "Abrahamic" faiths, referring to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, all of which in some way revere and trace back to Abraham.

I think the portrayal of Ismail/Ishmael as a "wild donkey" living apart with his "brothers" (not that any exist yet or the whole Hagar thing wouldn't have happened) is kind of saying that the idea of Abram having an heir with Serai's servant slave (to use the proper term for what Hagar probably was) was really a bad idea. As it likely was.

And given the history of masters sexually using/abusing their slaves, one wonders if this is as much Serai accepting and trying to justify Abram's fooling around with the slave girls as her actually suggesting the idea.
 
@Waterfall

Donkeys appear many times in the Bible and they are regarded positively. Some commentators suggest that portraying Ishmael as a "wild donkey" was actually a compliment. Some say it implies he will have his freedom and not live as the son of a slave.
 
@Mendalla

If we look ahead a few chapters in Genesis, we will see Ishmael being replaced by Isaac as Abram's heir. So it seems that the plan (if there really was one) backfired.

However, God looks favourably upon Ishmael.
 
And (ahem). Does anyone think sexual prowess might be implied as well?

Apparently there is a place in the Bible which expresses admiration for the genitals of donkeys. It sometimes comes up for consideration when atheists point out how ridiculous the bible is.

Wild donkeys are herd animals. Usually a herd consists of one male and several females. There can be additional males in the group as long as they remain subservient.
 
And (ahem). Does anyone think sexual prowess might be implied as well?

Apparently there is a place in the Bible which expresses admiration for the genitals of donkeys. It sometimes comes up for consideration when atheists point out how ridiculous the bible is.

Wild donkeys are herd animals. Usually a herd consists of one male and several females. There can be additional males in the group as long as they remain subservient.
I think if I'd rather be compared to a horse....if I were a man...lol
 
Back
Top