Indeed ...
Even in my relative comfort ... this new and confusing corona-religion is hard to ignore.
I wonder how long I am expected to continue to turn a blind eye to the global suffering being enforced in it's name sake.
All so that the privileged can feel safe from a virus that thankfully kills so few?
The lives of hundreds of millions of innocent people with exponentially less than us hang on our level of alarmism.
Again, there’s so much we don’t know.
But what about what we do know?
The current hospitalization rate for those infected with the virus is a small percent.
A big percent of all coronavirus deaths have been tied to nursing homes.
A big percent of coronavirus deaths are
with the virus as opposed to having died directly because of it.
A really big percent of deaths occurred among individuals with “underlying medical conditions”.
It is now very apparent that death counts related to the virus are overstated.
What we are dealing with now is a pandemic of casedemic ... and the majority of cases ... not even symptomatic?
What I knew before and what has been proven now is this ...
The Best Virus Response Is Less Government, Not More.
Any laws or rules meant to limit its spread are superfluous.
Really, what about the high possibility of sickness or even death requires a law?
People don’t need to be told to not hurt or kill themselves or endanger other's lives as a 'general rule'.
No reasonable person would seek to expand government power over human action during the spread of a virus.
Those who revel in being told what to do will respond that not everyone is rational when it comes to protecting themselves.
So true. Because accepted wisdom rarely ages well.
Think back to AIDS in the 1980s, and the popular view that it could be spread by people merely existing in the same room.
Those who don’t share the alarmism of doctors like Anthony Fauci or technocrats like Bill Gates - individuals who in no way face the risk of going without food, shelter or life’s comforts if it turns out they’re wrong - can tell us if those who aim to protect us are wrong or right.
Fauci was the doctor
who told us in 1983 a husband could pass on AIDS to his wife just by being in the same room.
"
The question remains: Is there any penalty in the nation's public health system for predictions that proved inaccurate but left widespread, unfounded fear in their wake?
Back in 1983, one scientist and doctor was sole author of a paper in the prestigious medical journal JAMA which stated that AIDS might be transmissible through “routine close contact, as within a family household.” That turned out not to be true, of course, but in the meantime the media had widely propagated the myth, naturally setting off a wave of hysteria.
Nevertheless, within months the author was promoted to chief of the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, a position he still holds. The author’s name? Dr. Anthony Fauci."