Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Such a thoughtful Prison Warden!
?????There is a large collective movement happening. Bigger than the civil rights movement. It isn’t happening here on WC per say, but it’s happening.
Following Luce’s post.?????
Try reading the Guardian -it's world-wide and tends to be more balanced.
![]()
Essential poll: Victorians overwhelmingly support harsh restrictions to curb Covid second wave
Almost three-quarters back Daniel Andrews’ public health measures, but premier’s approval rating stagnates while Morrison’s is buoyedwww.theguardian.com
You do seem stressed. I find a strong cup of tea helps.......
They probably hired a firm to do it, not in-house. Depends how that company formulates the questions, and also human error. I have several years of experience at 3 such firms (was also my job before I went back to school) - one very well known international one - but am not a statistician. I just know the general process of how the opinions get collected and processed and reported. But I believe they are probably mostly in favour. I’ve heard a few people from Australia themselves (pilgrims and a few others online) say they support it. I have no idea what their politics are...but I believe they do mostly support it.Now you're a stats major? The Guardian is a respected publications and there will be statisticians to consult.
They don't report the margin of error, but changes in sample size (as long as it's random) really only affect the margin of error of the stats. Clearly, a small majority of Victorians support the efforts being made to contain the virus.
And I find a dose of reality helps a whole lot more.You do seem stressed. I find a strong cup of tea helps.......
Now you're a stats major? The Guardian is a respected publications and there will be statisticians to consult.
They don't report the margin of error, but changes in sample size (as long as it's random) really only affect the margin of error of the stats. Clearly, a small majority of Victorians support the efforts being made to contain the virus.
Did you want a "butt ton" of virus in your "facehole" before this 'pandemic' ... did you wear a mask before this 'pandemic' to protect others from whatever virus you might 'as well' be asymptomatic of ... should we universally wear masks all the time whether we are feeling healthy or not ... Did you ever go out in public and sneeze or cough on people on purpose knowing full well that you could be spreading a 'virus' that you might not even know you had while not wearing a mask? Will you be wearing a mask in public for the rest of your life now that you are convinced of how important they are to lessening the spread of contagious infections. Would everyone wearing masks all the time work at curbing the spread of the common cold and other 'flu' symptoms ... and so on and so on ...This is an excellent argument for universal mask wearing. Do you want a "butt ton" of virus in your "facehole"?
Majorities in the sample of 500 Victorian voters think the lockdown is appropriate (67%) and will be effective in flattening the curve of new infections (60%)
Victoria has a population of over 6.6 million?
... how did I miss this 'calming' 'balanced' perspective.
Did you ever go out in public and sneeze or cough on people on purpose knowing full well that you could be spreading a 'virus' that you might not even know you had while not wearing a mask?
I'm not convinced on that with this virus. Not to say it's not possible, but I'm questioning if the comparison on that was fair. I should go dig up some of the articles on that. Useful information in general if it's true though.I found that video quite instructive in that I hadn't realized that "volume" of exposure could determine the "severity" of the resulting infection.