Jae ---your quote -----When you speak of "inspiration" unsafe, are you keeping in mind that there are different understandings of just what that word means.
unsafe says -----I posted the Greek word for God Breathed ----which is inspired ----so if you don't believe what the Greek word interpretation then I guess you make up your own meanings ---so give me the different understanding that you claim there is -----I am reposting what the Greek word says for you --if you have a problem with their interpretation speak to them NOT ME -----
unsafe says ----What is it you don't agree with here Jae ----maybe you know more about the Greek words than they do ---so enlighten me ----Please
This is the Greek word used in this scripture for God Breathed ----
2315. theopneustos
►
Strong's Concordance
theopneustos:
God-breathed, i.e.
inspired by God
Definition: God-breathed, inspired by God
Usage: God-breathed,
inspired by God,
due to the inspiration of God.
2315 /theópneustos ("God-breathed"), likely a term
coined by Paul, "expresses
the sacred nature of the Scriptures (their divine origin) and their power to sanctify believers" (C. Spicq, 2, 193).
[Inbreathing (2315 /theópneustos) relates directly to God's Spirit (Gk pneuma) which can also be translated "breath."]
2 Tim 3:16: "
Each-and-every (3956 /pás, singular) Scripture (Gk, singular) is God-breathed (
2315 /theópneustos) and profitable for teaching, for convincing, for correction, for training in righteousness."
The
singular (anarthrous) use of
3956 /pás ("all")
underlines that each part of speech (every inflected word-form, "reflex") used in the Bible is God-breathed, i.e.
inscripturated (written
) under divine inspiration.
[G. Archer, "
2315 (
theópneustos) is
better rendered 'breathed out by God' as the emphasis is upon the divine origin of the inscripturated revelation itself" (
A Survey of OT Introduction, fn. 7, 29).]
Your Quote here Jae -----Someone may well believe that the Bible was inspired without agreeing with your understanding of "inspiration."
unsafe says ---I welcome anyone to give me their interpretation of what they think inspired means ----so go ahead Jae --give me your interpretation of this word inspired by God -----and provide the scripture to back your interpretation --------
As far as your other inspired creations ---lets see what they say
Conceptual or Thought
Inspiration. The Bible is written by
inspired men,
but it is not God's mode of thought and expression. It is that of humanity. God, as a writer, is not represented. Men will often say such an expression is not like God.
unsafe says ---anyone who believes that goes against what the scripture says -----therefore they are wrongly dividing the word of God --and the Holy Spirit would never tell anyone that the God's word is not God's mode of thought and expression -----
What is dynamic inspiration?
Verbal plenary
inspiration: This view
gives a greater role to the human writers of the Bible while maintaining a belief that God preserved the integrity of the words of the Bible. ...
Dynamic inspiration:
The thoughts contained in the Bible are inspired,
but the words used were left to the individual writers.
unsafe says ----This contradicts what the scripture says ------2 Peter 1:20 Jae ---I have it posted largely above ------you can read it for yourself ---again anyone Preaching this is Wrongly Dividing the word and preaching False Doctrine ----
ntuition or illumination theory. It’s not the writings that are inspired, but the writers themselves. Inspiration is merely superior insight on behalf of natural man into moral and religious truth. God inspired individuals who wrote scripture.
If this were true, this type of inspiration could be claimed by Plato, Socrates and many others. Even today anybody who is similarly inspired could potentially write scripture.
unsafe says ----Enough Said here Jae anyone who thinks this Jae is not a True Christ-ian -----
If this were true, this type of inspiration could be claimed by Plato, Socrates and many others. Even today anybody who is similarly inspired could potentially write scripture.
Neo-orthodox inspiration. This view is similar to dynamic or partial inspiration.
It maintains while there are supernatural elements present, the Bible contain errors and cannot be taken literally. Therefore, the Bible is not divinely inspired, but rather a channel through which divine inspiration flows. It elevates the subjective experience of the individual over scripture. As with dynamic or partial inspiration, this view makes truth dependent solely on the discretion of the individual. There are no absolutes with this view.
unsafe says -----again enough said hereto Jae -----Anyone who thinks the Bible contains errors ----is
definitely not A True Christian ---that is calling God a Liar -----Period --The Holy Spirit would never direct anyone into this type of inspiration Jae ----
Natural inspiration. There is nothing supernatural about the Bible.
The writers were just men who wrote books or letters the same way anybody would. Over time, the Bible came to hold special significance for Christians.
This view holds the Bible is of an entirely human origin and no different than any other piece of literature. The Bible was written by men who were subject to error in what they wrote. Therefore, it is no different than any other work. This view should be rejected as erroneous.
unsafe says ------Really Jae ----and you profess to be A True Christian and giving these types of inspiration -----WOW
Dictation theory. The writers recorded God’s words without any participation of their own styles or personalities. They mechanically recorded the words of scripture, much as a secretary might write down the words they were told to write. This view asserts that God dictated the Bible in its entirety. Some even argue that the grammar must be perfect in every place because it’s the Holy Spirit’s grammar.
This view excludes individual personalities in the writing of scripture. A dictated Bible would present a consistent level of style and vocabulary, rather than the diversity of human characteristics that are displayed in scripture.
This ignores the fact there are apparent differences in the styles of the different writers.
Some have tried to explain this saying the Holy Spirit adopted the style of the writer in each case.
unsafe says -----another Blunder here Jae ---Your Grasping at straws with your different inspired theory's Jae -----if you really think these inspired theory's are OK for people to hold to Jae and you question what scripture I posted and the Greek word I posted for inspired --God Breathed ----If I were you I would seriously question my True Christ-ian thinking ------
unsafe says
This Seems to be the right one here below Jae which of course you left out -----all the rest are Satan's work ---keeping people in the dark --Spiritually Blinded ------Period -----
Verbal, plenary inspiration.
This view of Biblical inspiration holds that the Holy Spirit provided both verbal and plenary inspiration to the original writers. Both the words and ideas of scripture are inspired by God. Plenary means all the words used by the writers in their original manuscripts were equally inspired. Verbal means God directed the choice of the individual words used by the writers in their original manuscripts.
God so partnered with them to record His Word in the Bible in its entirety. This view accepts that the writer’s personalities were used of God based upon their unique backgrounds, including their styles and vocabularies. The Holy Spirit directed the writers of scripture in such a way that the original manuscripts were both verbally and fully inspired, infallible and without error.
This is in harmony with the declaration of 2 Timothy 3:16 which says, “All scripture is given by inspiration of God.” Peter wrote, “Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost” (2 Peter 1:20-21).
unsafe says this is how these people see this word inspired
Theories of Inspiration of Scripture - Ministrymaker
Definitions of Inspiration
- “God’s superintending of human authors so that, using their own individual personalities, they composed and recorded without error in the words of the original autographs His revelation to man” – Dr. Charles Ryrie.
- “The inexplicable power which the divine Spirit exercised over the authors of scriptures, to guide them even in the employment of the words they were to use, and to preserve them from error as well as from every omission” – Dr. Gaussen, Knowing the Doctrines of the Bible.
- “The supernatural influence of the Spirit of God on the human mind, by which prophets and apostles and sacred writers were qualified to set forth divine truth without any mixture of error” – Webster, Knowing the Doctrines of the Bible.
