Resurrection: Does Your Minister/Church Preach What You Believe?

[Mendalla]

And I have to agree with @revjohn on another point: Calling someone a "false prophet" on a board that is "a home for open-minded discussion and exploration of spiritual topics, moral issues and life's big questions" is really getting close to a line. We all have our views and our reasons for believing them and labeling anyone a "false prophet" simply for expressing their views here is, indeed, hostile and possibly abusive. Disagree with someone by all means, but calling someone a "false prophet" is, in the Christian context, going beyond mere disagreement. It labels them as someone to be distrusted and even as an enemy.

 

[blackbelt1961]

Airclean--post --
I have obligations to other Sisters and Brothers , to tell them what I feel" GODS Holy Spirit is saying to me. I don't hate Neo, I kind of like him". I will pray "GOD " changes his mind".

here is the thing Brother, we know your born again, so am I, so its Unsafe, RevSteven, RevJohn and some others on here

so why is it only your Holy Spirit is correct? is the Holy Spirit not all one and the same? so it must be something else, could it be you , your lack of English?

I mean , I am a believer but I am not a theologian Like RevSteven or RevJohn , so when they respond I try and listen , you seem to not to

 

[airclean33]

Mine also comes from Gods word, Im a Christian too remember , what I do not share is mostly your interpretation of it so I stand by my view of Neo and suggest as revJohn has as well , that you are wrong in this matter

Hi Blackbelt I understand where you stand". As I said I am not going to try an help you , this time". Because of the way you posted". I will let GOD" our Father" do it. If you believe what your have posting, makes our Father happy", you have gone more astray than I thought". I don't hate you brother", I wish you a long good walk "with, GOD" our Father". May all be well with you and yours. airclean33-Gord.

 

[airclean33]

And I have to agree with @revjohn on another point: Calling someone a "false prophet" on a board that is "a home for open-minded discussion and exploration of spiritual topics, moral issues and life's big questions" is really getting close to a line. We all have our views and our reasons for believing them and labeling anyone a "false prophet" simply for expressing their views here is, indeed, hostile and possibly abusive. Disagree with someone by all means, but calling someone a "false prophet" is, in the Christian context, going beyond mere disagreement. It labels them as someone to be distrusted and even as an enemy

--Airclean--post--............
I don't believe Neo said anything that should bother you. Your not a believe in Yahshua or GOD" are you? Why are you calling Neo name's? I never thought of you as my enemy Mendalla ,now I am wondering if I should not look at your, posts again . Has Neo said some thing about your thoughts on the Stars?I must have missed it.

 

[blackbelt1961]

Hi Blackbelt I understand where you stand". As I said I am not going to try an help you , this time". Because of the way you posted". I will let GOD" our Father" do it. If you believe what your have posting, makes our Father happy", you have gone more astray than I thought". I don't hate you brother", I wish you a long good walk "with, GOD" our Father". May all be well with you and yours. airclean33-Gord.

I highly doubt that you can see that arrogance in this

 

[chansen]

I see we're having irony for lunch.

 

[revjohn]

You know John I hate keep , telling a Minister they are teaching Wrong?

Actually airclean33, I don't know that you hate telling a Minister that they are wrong at all. I don't even suspect that it is true that you hate telling any Minister that they are wrong. I actually think you take great pride in telling others, particularly Ministers, that they are wrong.

Of course John your Wrong ",once more"

You are aware that you are not the sole arbiter of right and wrong are you not? Just because you believe someone is wrong does not make them wrong. Particularly when you demonstrate that you do not understand what has been said. Your failure to understand doesn't make me wrong. It means you fail to understand.

Did you not read, what I sent to black belt ?

I have been following the conversation. You are not convincing or compelling. Not only that you rarely stop to listen to what others say to you in return.

Ha..Ha-----So you believe ,Neo and me Teach The Same Thing.

Ha ha. No, I don't.
Ha ha. I never even said that you teach the same thing.
Ha ha. I said you share on the same level.
Ha ha. How can you read that and decide you have to leap to such an erroneous understanding.
Ha ha. It is like you don't even read what is being said.
Ha ha. It is like you imagined I said something very different from what I actually posted.

Which for the ha ha record was this,

At most, he operates on a similar level to airclean33. He shares what he knows about what he believes.

Ha ha. Notice the word I used was "shared" not "teach?"
Ha ha. Notice that I said share about what he believes.
Ha ha. You share what you believe. Doesn't make you a prophet, and you share so badly you don't qualify as a teacher.
Ha ha. Neo shares what he believes. Doesn't make him a prophet either. I suspect he has convinced the same number of people to see things from his perspective that you have.
Ha ha. Don't feel bad about that I don't think many of us have managed to convince any other to completely abandon the understandings they entered WonderCafe.ca or Wondercafe2 with in favour of some perspective very different from their own.
Ha ha. Some are better at carrying on a respectful and coherent conversation.
Ha ha. Some are even capable of understanding what others post to them.

Come on John can't you do better than this?

I can do better. Anyone who reads what I posts and understands what I post knows I have done better. The one in the conversation who isn't doing better, in fact, isn't even doing well. That person is you.

Neo has said he, was a Christion.

News to me.

And even if he did make the claim it is clear that most of what he studies is not Christianity nor taught by Christians. He likes to examine scriptures and comment on them but he doesn't come at most texts from anything other than a gnostic perspective and the Christian Church declared Gnosticism heretical ages ago. He stands on the outside.

Doesn't mean we cannot talk. Doesn't even mean that we can't learn from him.

Apart from that he makes no prophecy that can be tested.

Yet he teaches another way to come to GOD. I guess you haven't noted this?

You'd have to be pretty thick not to notice it. That doesn't make him a false prophet. It puts him outside of Christianity. If he was Jewish, he wouldn't be a false prophet. If he were Muslim he wouldn't be a false prophet. If he were Buddhist he wouldn't be a false prophet.

He would be different and we would be free to disagree.

And any who bothered to note the history of our interaction (Neo's and Mine) would find that I hardly ever agree with him on his theological interpretations of scripture. I probably agree with him less that I agree with you and those familiar with our interaction (yours and mine) find that you and I rarely agree on interpretation either. Which doesn't mean that I think you are a false prophet. I don't find you prophetic at all. And the disagreement, most of that could rightly earn you the label of heretic, if you were a teacher or any consequence.

The fact that you share here means that you can be wrong and it carries very little consequence.

Here again John , are you say it is ok for a Person, to say what they think" . That is ok if your not a Christian an your name is not Airclean ?

Everyone here, including you is free to say what they think. You are. Neo is. I am.

Nobody here is free to say what they think and remain immune from critique. You aren't. Neo isn't. I am not.

And I'm willing to dig through archives to find out just how many times you have decided that you felt free to slander me if you want to go through and find out how many times I have slandered you. Not just disagreed mind you because that would take hours upon hours and in the end means nothing. I'm talking about the times you called me a liar and insinuated that I had been drinking stuff like that.

But I will mark it down, you still have a right to post as You see things' When you and I face GOD " one day. I am sure He will see who is right.

Why do you need to mark that down? When you get so see God face to face are you going to whip out a long list of complaints about people who disagree with you that God needs to discipline? Does God really dance to your tune like that?

I don't intend to write anything down. God's memory and perspective are greater than mine and if the Holy Spirit convicts me that I owe anyone an apology I will give it to them.

Do you really Believe a False--Prophet will announce himself or herself??

They aren't much of a Prophet if they don't right? Eventually, they have to come and say, "thus sayeth the Lord" or something very close to that because the power of a false prophet is very much like the power of the prophet. Both claim to speak for God. We know one is true because what he says God has said comes to pass while the false prophet makes claims about Gods saying this or that and those things never happen.

At least, that is what scripture teaches so if you want to teach something different than that. Go ahead. Just don't claim that what you are doing is speaking on God's behalf.

Do you believe you come back as another person, again and again.

I do not. And I have spoken with Neo about that and made it pretty clear that I disagree with him. At the end of the day that means that we believe differently. That doesn't make him a false prophet to me nor does it make me a false prophet to him. It means we disagree.

This once more dose not mean Noe can't post as he feels. I believe other Christians should no an understand this".

I'm pretty sure most Christians are aware that reincarnation is not a part of Christian theology. But if you feel that Christians aren't aware of that then what you can say, respectfully, is that reincarnation is not a Christian belief. You don't have to proclaim him a false prophet.

Well John I can hardly believe you post this here.

I expect that comes as a shock to absolutely nobody.

I Agree Neo dose not follow Christianity I believe this is what we are taking about.

And yet you insist he is a false prophet. Do you even listen to yourself? I mean, if you don't that makes a lot of sense why you wouldn't listen to anyone else.

I explain up top he Neo said he follow Christ but also had other beliefs.

You say you are Born Again. You have shared some beliefs which don't find a lot of support within Christianity. You have had that pointed out to you on occasion. Remember anyone calling you a false prophet for doing that? Millions of Americans claim Trump is a Christian leader. Use your own discernment.

What Neo may claim and the faith that Neo frequently shares are not Christian. Even though he makes reference to christ he does not understand Jesus the Christ as Christians do and his understanding of the Christ is very different from a Jewish perspective. His use of the term "Christ" does not rest on an understanding of "annointing" so much as it rests on an understanding of "enlightenment."

Strictly speaking Christianity assigns a new definition to the terms Meshiach and Christos when claiming Christ is either. The terms existed before Jesus and as you are aware the vast majority of Judaism doesn't see Jesus as being a fit for the term because they don't see the Messianic age that was supposed to follow the arrival of the Messiah.

The problem comes when you do not realize that there are more understandings of christos and meshiach that do not point to the person of Jesus and you insist that everytime somebody mentions either they must mean Jesus as Christianity has basically always understood him.

The same kind of people nearly go apoplectic when the word myth is used when discussing scripture or someone insists that scripture was never intended to be read literally from Genesis to Revelation.

You may be worried that some new Christian coming into WC2 might think Neo is a Christian. I do not share that same concern. Frankly, I think Neo does a pretty good job of demonstrating that he is not a Christian and does not hold Christian beliefs.

So you think I am ignorant for pointing out That Neo is not only looking some what like a Christian," but is not.

I think you are ignorant for claiming Neo to be a false prophet. I think I was clear in communicating that. I think it is ignorant because it is pretty clear that whatever God it is that Neo is talking about it isn't one that is identifiably Christian or Jewish. If I thought that Neo spent any time posting here saying, "this is what Christians believe" or even "this is what must be believed to be Christian" I would happily disagree and present a different perspective.

Neo, from my experience, doesn't do that at all.

I think it is just as clear that he feels what he believes is just as certain as you feel about your belief and I feel about mine. That doesn't make him false. At most it makes him different.

You and I disagree. That doesn't make either one of us false.

I find a Minster" of

GOD , not pointing this out to Christians coming on line, who Neo is. Not doing His duty.

I don't hover on WC2 pointing out to Christians on line when I think you are wrong either. When we have a discussion and we disagree I do my best to offer my understanding of the text. I don't claim to be Born Again as if theological conversation is a game of Euchre and Born Again is always the right bower. And if that is your testimony about yourself how compelling is it going to be for others?

When I am in a conversation with Neo and I disagree with him I am not shy about making that known. The fact that I can do that without calling him a false prophet or a heretic shows that I understand he doesn't belong to my faith tradition so those terms have no significance for the discussion.

Again John one who serve GOD" you are not to Judge" . You know Like Me".

I disagree with you. But only because you are such a hypocrite when it comes to matters of judgement. I mean, if you really thought that we both served the same God and that because of that I should not judge you then you would never have ever judged me as often as you do.

I disagree with you. I have yet to condemn you. I have pointed out where I thought you have made mistakes and I have challenged you when I believed you bore false witness against myself or others.

I am a Child of The Living GOD'

Yes, I know. Just above you said we served the same God.

Be Carful you don't bring Judgment on yourself".

Go thou and do likewise.

To correct another child of GOD" by His Word ,"is not wrong". We are to help one another John.

I agree. Which is why I decided to comment on the allegations of Neo being a false prophet. I believe you err in attributing such a label to Neo.

I can't remember using the Word Heresy" John.

I can't remember claiming that you did. I mention it as a comparison. You understand what a comparison is right?

As I 'v posted before John . I in no way said Neo should not post.

Yes. I did hear you claim that.

It doesn't change that accusing somebody of being a false prophet is and attempt to shut them up. You've read scripture. What does it say we are supposed to do with false prophets airclean33? Mind sharing the scripture on that?

You accuse him of being a false prophet not to instruct him or correct him but to get him to stop saying what he has said.

The fact that you claim you do that to protect Christians coming on line communicates that you want Neo not to say what he has been saying. You don't want him to shut up entirely, you just don't want him posting things you disagree with.

But go ahead, remind me of what we are supposed to do with false prophets and tell me how the allegation is friendly and adds to conversation.

 

[unsafe]

I personally think it all depends on what your interpretation of Prophet is --------The Hebrew Word -----Strong's Hebrew: 5030. נָבִיא (nabi) -- a spokesman, speaker -------the Greek word says a prophet, poet; a person gifted at expositing divine truth. -------the English dictionary says ------a spokesman for a movement, doctrine, etc

So it seems it all depends on how we see this word -----


This is what scripture says -------

2 Peter 2 (GNT)
False Teachers
2 False prophets appeared in the past among the people, and in the same way false teachers will appear among you. They will bring in destructive, untrue doctrines, and will deny the Master who redeemed them, and so they will bring upon themselves sudden destruction. 2 Even so, many will follow their immoral ways; and because of what they do, others will speak evil of the Way of truth. 3 In their greed these false teachers will make a profit out of telling you made-up stories. For a long time now their Judge has been ready, and their Destroyer has been wide awake!


So is Neo a spokesman for his Doctrine which goes against God's word ------you all decide for yourselves ------here are some examples


unsafe says ----So Here below Neo says ------ see post 293 Pg 15 ----- the Bible Was written ----He is proclaiming this as truth --- not just giving his opinion in my view -----here proclaiming How the Bible was interpreted which is different then what the Bible says ------Then proclaims that --Satan --hell and the fall are a misinterpreted because of how the Bible was written

Neo's Quote ----
The Bible was written by well meaning, spiritually inspired men. It was then interpreted (usually) by well meaning, spiritually inspired men and women. This leaves a great possibility and even a likelihood for misinterpretation, as is the case in the personification of Satan and his abode called hell, or the concept of Adam and Eve and their "fall" from paradise.

unsafe says ----
Again Neo is proclaiming here below he knows for sure that hell is here and now and---not saying in my opinion ------He is proclaiming what our physical existence is and then says there is no clear understanding of what hell is which goes against what the Bible says ---Proclaiming what our physical existence is ---Proclaiming Who Satan is which is not what the Bible says ---so going against God's word ------


Neo's Quote
Hell is the physical world we live in now. It's a world where we are limited by time. Without an understanding of the reincarnation of the Soul into this physical world, over and over again, there is no clear understanding of what hell is. Our physical existence is a training ground for the Soul to learn. It's no coincidence that Satan is associated with the Roman god Saturn, who the Greeks called Chronus, the personification of time.


What Neo is preaching here and he is preaching or teaching here cause he is saying words like --The Bible was Written -----Hell is ----This leaves a great possibility and even a likelihood for misinterpretation As is the Case of Satan --hell and the fall -----All which goes against God's word -----------he is not giving his opinion ----he is tell us what he is saying is his truth -----


Neo's quote -----From Post 316 Pg 16

Salvation comes from how we believe, not what. I believe Jesus taught this when he said things like this: "for where your treasure is, there your heart will be also". No specific belief system needed, just a sincere and loving heart.

unsafe says
Notice here ----he doesn't says- I believe or I think ----he makes a clear proclamation ----Salvation comes from ----like he is saying truth not his opinion -----No belief system needed ---Speaking his truth --not an opinion or belief ------both Goes against what the Bible says about Salvation


Words matter here ----in m y opinion ---so I can see why airclean33 might think Neo is a false prophet ----

I definitely think he is proclaiming False Doctrine -----if he had of said ---in my view Salvation comes from -----or I personally believe that Salvation comes from -----it might have been taken different by airclean33 ----but he is says here he knows where Salvation comes from ----he knows no belief system is needed ---etc ---which is False according to God's word --

 

[airclean33]

Hi John lots of time, on your hands? or are you writing a book?
Most I can let go by . As you cut what, I said as post to you. Anyway. But this I could not..
John--post--

Strictly speaking Christianity assigns a new definition to the terms Meshiach and Christos when claiming Christ is either. The terms existed before Jesus and as you are aware the vast majority of Judaism doesn't see Jesus as being a fit for the term because they don't see the Messianic age that was supposed to follow the arrival of the Messiah.

--Airclean--post--..........
If you mean the Jews, as a whole yes I could agree" . But keep in mind many Jews were His" fowlers '. in the upper room 120 of His fowlers were there , as The Holy Spirit in filled them. in a few days later ,there was as many as 5000," that had a meeting". I believe the name for The Christ is really YahShua" which seems to mean GOD with us. Another word would have been Emmanuel. Book of Matt-1: 23 GOD With us. Other words you could call Him..Johovah, I am not to sure, of this one, so much though, it could be. Jehoshua, this one sounds much like Joshawa. But no were did I find Jesus in Hebrew as Israel which also means the Jews, never use J in there alphabet .
Yeshua (ישוע‬, with vowel pointing יֵשׁוּעַ‬ – yēšūă‘ in Hebrew) was a common alternative form of the name יְהוֹשֻׁעַ‬ ("Yehoshua" – Joshua) in later books of the Hebrew Bible and among Jews of the Second Temple period. The name corresponds to the Greek spelling Iesous, from which, through the Latin Iesus, comes the English spelling Jesus.[1][2]
Other means Show------
The Hebrew spelling Yeshua (ישוע‬) appears in some later books of the Hebrew Bible. Once for Joshua the son of Nun, and 28 times for Joshua the High Priest and (KJV "Jeshua") and other priests called Jeshua – although these same priests are also given the spelling Joshua. I hope this will help John.

 

[revjohn]

Hi John lots of time, on your hands? or are you writing a book?

Neither. I can touch type. Allows me to put a lit of thoughts on screen with very little time taken.

I also am pretty comfortable with the quote function so it saves me some time replying.

As you cut what, I said as post to you. Anyway.

Not much sense quoting what I am not responding to is there? It isn't like I am censoring your post just responding to parts of it.

If you mean the Jews, as a whole yes I could agree"

That is what I meant.

But keep in mind many Jews were His" fowlers '. in the upper room 120 of His fowlers were there , as The Holy Spirit in filled them. in a few days later ,there was as many as 5000," that had a meeting".

And because of Jesus they developed a new understanding of the whole role of Messiah. Which was my point.

I believe the name for The Christ is really YahShua" which seems to mean GOD with us. Another word would have been Emmanuel.

Yeshua is the transliteration of the Hebrew name Joshua. It is rendered in Greek as Insous (the n here represents a long a some use an e when they transliterate for folk who don't have a Greek background. One is more precise.) and from the Greek we get the English Jesus. The Latin doesn't really change the spelling much.

The Christ is not a name, it is a title meaning "the Lord's anointed."

But this isn't anything unknown to me. Not really sure why you felt you had to cut and paste it into your response to me.

It is almost like you were using the internet to try and show me ignorant in some way

And nothing about how Jesus' name has been rendered or pronounced in several languages ties Neo to Christianity and justifies condemning him as a false prophet.

I wonder why you didn't respond to my question about what we are supposed to do to a false prophet?

 

[Luce NDs]

Ignorance is best in the form of naïveté as a metaphorical title for not much power in the listening field ... a different pas'tour ... some BS may be encountered and po' lyre understood than imaginable ...

Some abstract requited as tran-substance to the opinionated without virtue of knowing ...

Silence is like ID ... the aboriginal power ... nothing to listen to but what's out there is one is quite for scratch creation ... you can almost feel God's thoughts about why heh took High Flight as a way out of presence ... an anthropomorphic attribute? Just like a good man when encountering a war monger ... go somewhere quiet and write yourself a good one ... myth that is!

There is a poorly understood tome that says there are a lot of stories beyond the earthy portions ... a wild stretch?

 

[airclean33]

Neither. I can touch type. Allows me to put a lit of thoughts on screen with very little time taken.


--Airclean--post--...........
Yes John as I am very use to the way I Post as well. I know you don't take to much time responding to all that I have posted".

--John--post-......;
Not much sense quoting" what I am responding to is there? It isn't like I am censoring your post, just responding to parts of it."

--Airclean--post-.................
Well of course John////////.

--John -post-..............
And because of Jesus they developed a new understanding of the whole role of Messiah. .
--Airclean--post-..........
What understanding was that John?
Was That about His" Name being. Yahshua?

--John --post-.............
Yeshua is the transliteration of the Hebrew name Joshua. It is rendered in Greek as Insous (the n here represents a long a some use an e when they transliterate for folk who don't have a Greek background. One is more precise.) and from the Greek we get the English Jesus. The Latin doesn't really change the spelling much.


--Airclean---post-...............

The Christ is not a name, it is a title meaning "the Lord's anointed."

--Airclean-post--.............
Dose anywere in GODS Word," tell you" or any body to call Emmanuuel, Matthew 1:23--
Jesus" .Was that not a name, made up" after many years Later.

--John-post-.............
But this isn't anything unknown to me. Not really sure why you felt you had to cut and paste it into your response to me.

-Airclean--post...........
--So now you finely show , you knew about it all the time???



--John--post-.............
And nothing about how Jesus' name has been rendered or pronounced in several languages ties Neo to Christianity and justifies condemning him

-Airclean--post--
John you seem to be all over the thread, Now you want to blame Neo" . For what you have posted about Neo. and me".

-John Post-.............
I wonder why you didn't respond to my question about what we are supposed to do to a false prophet?

--I sort of thought, you were going to tell me". Answer this John , if a person who is making a mistake, an still living, is able to be forgiven and excepted into GODS' Kingdom", if he or she asks forgiveness of GOD". Ask the thief on the CROSS , John". Luke 23: 39-----It is not my place to condemn others, John". That is not saying I cannot" , it is just I will not". For they are my Brothers and Sisters in birth". GOD" is Judge of all" I see no reason, to get ahead of Him."
GOD be with you and yours John. Airclean33-Gord.

 

[blackbelt1961]

--I sort of thought, you were going to tell me". Answer this John , if a person who is making a mistake, an still living, is able to be forgiven and excepted into GODS' Kingdom" Airclean33-Gord.

but according to you, a mistake is not a sin its simply , a mistake so why ask for forgiveness?, its a mistake right

 

[airclean33]

but according to you, a mistake is not a sin its simply , a mistake so why ask for forgiveness?, its a mistake right

OK Brother your listing to the wrong people BlackBelt", I have tried to talk with you as a Brother". But it seems you would rather attack", why is this Brother ? Have you lost faith in GODS" holy Spirit ? It is not a sin to us Spirit fill Family of GOD. We are Changed to His" Children" . As I have tried to explain to you before, We are not under The Laws".

 

[blackbelt1961]

OK Brother your listing to the wrong people BlackBelt", I have tried to talk with you as a Brother". But it seems you would rather attack", why is this Brother ? Have you lost faith in GODS" holy Spirit ? It is not a sin to us Spirit fill Family of GOD. We are Changed to His" Children" . As I have tried to explain to you before, We are not under The Laws".

can you explain the difference between a mistake and a sin ?

 

[unsafe]

airclean33 ------ your quote ------But it seems you would rather attack", why is this Brother

Remember your not fighting flesh and blood with critical comments --------there is an enemy loose who attacks the mind and can influence us to cause strife between Christians -----Satan is the Master at bringing up the past to the forefront ----

It all depends who we are entertaining at the moment the thought comes in to attack ---we have Grace to call on to help us in that moment of weakness -----God's Grace is sufficient -----we can chose to act on the critical thought or we can choose to call on Grace to help us not to act on the thought ------We win or loose the Battle in our minds

This scripture is very powerful when put to practice when needed -----Knowing who is behind the attack makes it easier to Love the Person ------

 

[airclean33]

can you explain the difference between a mistake and a sin ?

Airclean-post---No Blckbelt not to you".

 

[airclean33]

airclean33 ------ your quote ------But it seems you would rather attack", why is this Brother

Remember your not fighting flesh and blood with critical comments --------there is an enemy loose who attacks the mind and can influence us to cause strife between Christians -----Satan is the Master at bringing up the past to the forefront ----

It all depends who we are entertaining at the moment the thought comes in to attack ---we have Grace to call on to help us in that moment of weakness -----God's Grace is sufficient -----we can chose to act on the critical thought or we can choose to call on Grace to help us not to act on the thought ------We win or loose the Battle in our minds

This scripture is very powerful when put to practice when needed -----Knowing who is behind the attack makes it easier to Love the Person ------

Thank you Sister , for your post. I was not going to post to you as everyone I have posted to . Want me to explain what I am saying. There are teachings I believe , only GOD through The Holy Spirit" should Teach. I will how ever, listen to Sisters and Brothers in The Spirit".
May our GOD" The same GOD" as Christ's". always be with you . airclean33--Gord.

 

[blackbelt1961]

Airclean-post---No Blckbelt not to you".

 

[revjohn]

I know you don't take to much time responding to all that I have posted

Want to sit down and count how many questions you ask that I ignore versus how many questions I ask that you ignore?

Was That about His" Name being. Yahshua?

Yeshua. If you are going to cut and paste something in an attempt to show me ignorant you are best served by not constantly screwing up the spelling yourself.

And the significance of Yeshua? It means "to rescue" or "to deliver"

Dose anywere in GODS Word," tell you" or any body to call Emmanuuel, Matthew 1:23--
Jesus" .Was that not a name, made up" after many years Later.

I assume you mean other than Matthew 1: 23?

Like maybe Isaiah 7: 14.

So now you finely show , you knew about it all the time???

Finally show? This has some relevance to you deciding to call Neo a false prophet does it?

John you seem to be all over the thread, Now you want to blame Neo" . For what you have posted about Neo. and me".

I seem to be all over the thread?

In a discussion about you calling Neo a false prophet I decided to go on and on about the name of Jesus as it appeared in the Hebrew, then Greek, then Latin and then English? That was me was it?

If I am all over the thread it is in pursuit of you because you can't stay on topic.

Which, if memory serves was you calling Neo a false prophet and me, among others, saying that your allegation doesn't fit.

You do remember that part of the conversation right?

Now you want to blame Neo" . For what you have posted about Neo. and me".

I haven't blamed Neo for anything. Certainly not for you calling him a false prophet. I think I have said I don't always agree with Neo and that I don't think that just because I disagree with him that he qualifies as a false prophet. With respect to this thread I don't think I have had much interaction actually with Neo. Talked about him some, talked with him not at all.

I sort of thought, you were going to tell me".

I could have. I didn't. I asked for you to share what the scripture says we should do with a false prophet. I mean you are the one so, hell-bent, on insisting that Neo is one well, why is it important that he be one. What does scripture say should be done with false prophets?

Answer this John ,

Happily.

When you answer the question I have repeatedly asked and you still have not answered, which is more relevant to the discussion than most of the questions you have asked and I have answered already.