TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

A fictional character to whom we can liken Donald J. Trump is Officer Judy Hopps of Zootopia.

latest


Consider these qualities that hold true for both Hopps and Trump...

1. They don't quit.

2. They stand up for their friends.

3. They have flaws but they admit they have flaws, and they do their best to correct them.

4. They aren't afraid to let people know when they're wrong.

5. They believe in themselves.

Source of information on Hopps: http://ohmy.disney.com
 
Lol. Trump never admits he's wrong he just deflects blame to someone else. The only time was with the alleged Iran video - he probably had advisors begging him to do so!

He really put his foot in it today.
 
Lol. Trump never admits he's wrong he just deflects blame to someone else. The only time was with the alleged Iran video - he probably had advisors begging him to do so!

He really put his foot in it today.
I can't keep up, was it when he said someone should assassinate Hilary if she becomes President because she will get rid of or change the 2nd amendment?
 
I think he meant that the 2nd amendment guys are a large cohesive group that

could easily vote Hilary out. But even that is scary.
 
I'm surprise nobody has commented on the oddity of 50 senior civil servants (espionage, dirty tricks and assassinations) and military brass have openly supported Hillary, and slammed Trump. i don't think I've ever heard of that in a democracy, I've known some very senior civil servants - and it was understood that we never discussed partisan matters.
The is so highly improper that they probably should be fired. But the press simply reports this as if it were a perfectly normal story.
(Oh, thanks for the reminder that Trump has the intelligence and morality of a cartoon bunny. I think maybe I'll skip VBS this year.)
 
What did he say after the end of this shortened clip? I'm sure you've answered the question asking what you think he meant by now......

You can look it up yourself on YouTube Northwind. One thing he didn't say is what @Waterfall stated, "...he said someone should assassinate Hilary if she becomes President because she will get rid of or change the 2nd amendment..."
 
When it comes to Benghazi, N. Libya, Donald J. Trump never ignored security requests, never intentionally cut security, never lied about "a video," never silenced witnesses, and never lied to congress.
 
Guy's youtube channel i like
Where he will take commenter's questions and present them to actual Palestinians n Israelis etc

 
I'm surprise nobody has commented on the oddity of 50 senior civil servants (espionage, dirty tricks and assassinations) and military brass have openly supported Hillary, and slammed Trump. i don't think I've ever heard of that in a democracy, I've known some very senior civil servants - and it was understood that we never discussed partisan matters.
The is so highly improper that they probably should be fired. But the press simply reports this as if it were a perfectly normal story.
(Oh, thanks for the reminder that Trump has the intelligence and morality of a cartoon bunny. I think maybe I'll skip VBS this year.)

Is that contrary to unified bo' rock racing under the rule book ... thus sublime to roué's?

Then there are others that will skim over that deep dark pool ... like romantic Jude'an suffering pass over of the details ... in the rush to be right polity ... the extremely righteously fixed? How did dialogue get so complex ... other than for the rationale of separating those determined to be naïve about greater distribution of small facts ... points overlooked in the tinee st ways ...
 

I like the personal god theory ... thus you can do as you desire without connection to the others'elf ... so you can understand the surroundings that are extensive compared to the personal lock up feature of confined cognizance.

But isn't cognizance of a greater nature a large sense of awareness? Perhaps it is just a dilution theory evolving out of the whetted dream syndrome where responsibility is water down to allow success of parts, sectors and portions of sects ... these chitsz may come to you in the alternate swan as a shadow of nightmare ... and a kind of chitsz-em of voiding the topicality of continuum by itty bitty reproduction ... recycling of DNA?

Round it goes ...

Can cognizance exist in a world where mental processing is doled out to machines that have not a care ... just a fixed routine as artificial intelligence as a code handler?
 
Last edited:
Trump is intelligent and wise enough to not suggest an assassination attempt be made on Clinton.


Intelligence and wisdom is very questionable after saying something like this. I would call someone intelligent who knows that there will be people ut there with less intelligence who will jump on this as a suggestion. Same as there are people out there who take their gun and shoot into a crowd, because it is becoming a more and more fashionable type of suicide.
 
Intelligence and wisdom is very questionable after saying something like this. I would call someone intelligent who knows that there will be people ut there with less intelligence who will jump on this as a suggestion. Same as there are people out there who take their gun and shoot into a crowd, because it is becoming a more and more fashionable type of suicide.

Heh ... isn't violence and power groping the name of the game of what goes on under the table and tablets as scribbled in stone? Thus stuck and immovable to thus so instituted ...
 
Intelligence and wisdom is very questionable after saying something like this. I would call someone intelligent who knows that there will be people ut there with less intelligence who will jump on this as a suggestion. Same as there are people out there who take their gun and shoot into a crowd, because it is becoming a more and more fashionable type of suicide.

Of course Trump is not responsible if anyone takes what he has said in the wrong way and based on that misunderstanding does something wrong. That must be perfectly clear.
 
Back
Top