TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Jews in the U.S. are organizing in antiTrump movement. Netanyahu has far, far overplayed his hand in his dealings with the U.S. and Palestine. American Jews, probably a majority of them, have had enough of Israel.

Took them long enough. Some of us had had enough of them about a decade or two ago.
 
Tis un-rael ... his turning? Thus the virtue starts as consequence to previous un-rael 'd reason T'was not pondered about enough in the past ... thus virtues NDs begin ...

It all starts ag'in? Time is like that passes in a whorl or EDDy in the arid places as heh dumb ... thus odd sounds on the roof ... an open topped room in Hebrew fashion as a place to Kohl at night ... and with the Greek interpretation you may strike Goals in the dark ... and thus binding Goal'd ... as a ring with threads attached ... shekels ... of silver pieces? Foreign intelligence left behind by sheer f(lux) ... a function of light luck ... not lux in other traditions where breeding is controlled by husband rye ... his emotions flashing ... that UV shaft as deep 'urple?

Rael folk can't do nothing without emotional input towards what later will be chewed over ... rumen 8'd ... but could be roué 've men as UV assumed ... that without question?
 
In fact, is Trump conservative or liberal?
In the past, large numbers of Christian clergy have supported wars. In fact, they have supported wars, with rare exceptions almost constantly for the last 500 years. The support for war against Vietnam, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, for the killing of perhaps 300,000 Guatemalan civilans...the widespread use of torture....for carpet bombing from WW2 on, for napalm.... i've heard little to no open discussion on any of these led by clergy. hitler had no trouble finding chaplains for his armies.
Where was the church debate on the conquest of Cuba and Haiti, and the imposing of dictatorships? Ditto for The Phillipines in the first half of the 29th century, and after WW2. Where is the church now that U.S. special ops have murdered a woman in South America (and scarcely the first one) for being environmentalist? And we sent chaplains with the Canadians who fought in the Boer War to help wealthy British steal gold mines. They were also present when over ten thousand Boers died in Candian-run concentratin camps.
And, while the churches offer some help to some of the world's millions of refugees, I have heard no criticism of the west for creating those refugees.
 
And my original queston remains. Was Jesus conservative or liberal?

As discussed in another thread, he seems to be whatever the person answering the question wants to be. Politically, he seems to have been rather conservative to the extent that he did not really seek to overturn the Empire or otherwise change the government (render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's). Religiously, he seems to have been reform-minded but whether those reforms were radical or reactionary depends on perspective. I'm sure that the scribes and Pharisees saw him as a radical but, really, he was trying to bring the religion back to the vision of people like Isaiah which some could read as being reactionary. IOW, it depends.
 
Well, I can't imagine Jesus voting for either Trump or Clinton. However his political leanings might be defined, I see no parallel to the politics of any major nation. (including Canada). They are all based on greed.
 

So, to be clear, are you just being contrarian by posting Adams' Trump apologism (which is really what his columns are) or would you actually consider voting for Trump? In my case, whether he is a good president or not is moot because I wouldn't vote for his party until they get themselves unhitched from the Christian right and tea party. I don't really like Clinton either and I'm hearing suggesting that the Green party candidate is bit off her rocker, too (I am starting to sour on our Green Party as well), so I'd like end up with Gary Johnson of Libertarian. He seems fairly sane and I can support probably 50-70% of their platform.
 
Right in there with : "nothing makes rational sense!" Which is as expected when looking into an emotional setting from an outlandish position of intelligence ... as regarded by the emotional bunching ... a side affect of gravitas?

Thus a decent indication there is a rift here to be bridged somewhere in the future ... not now as people have no desires about thoughts and such crap as be falling from heaven ... a state of mind best kept under foot!

Is that a reasonable fetish to live in ... by and large outside of the baffling fringe creating shadow psyches? These may cause mental dissonance as the emotions and intellect within your head space has impacts and crashes of great momentum!

Thus brain storms .. and dreams of common BLTZFX ... an abstract medium, or dark belle tole'rs as maritime dogmas? Gong and yere out ...
 
So, to be clear, are you just being contrarian by posting Adams' Trump apologism (which is really what his columns are) or would you actually consider voting for Trump? In my case, whether he is a good president or not is moot because I wouldn't vote for his party until they get themselves unhitched from the Christian right and tea party. I don't really like Clinton either and I'm hearing suggesting that the Green party candidate is bit off her rocker, too (I am starting to sour on our Green Party as well), so I'd like end up with Gary Johnson of Libertarian. He seems fairly sane and I can support probably 50-70% of their platform.
Id vote for Bernie
And I dont know what you.mean by apologism...that seems to be a neologism of the religious that i dont grok yet :3

Scott Adams blog is his observations and his attempts to try to understand the world around him. Whe he doesnt understand he tries different methods to do so...one of them is to ask his audience. He uses the concept of filters (which seems to be isomorphic to Belief Systems) which he then applies o whatever it is he is looking at. Thus looking at Trump through the Crazy Clown filter or the Master Wizard filter...and looking at human behaviour through the Moist Robot filter...

When you read that url title note that he doesnt mean anyone who doesnt like trump is rabid...he was demonstrating with that post what he used to convince someone who was strongly against trump....hypnotizing...to otherwise...

I find his observations fun

Among the possible explantions for the US election he provides more explanations...more than just the Politicians are corrupt or crazy Belief Systems...

Thats all...
 
This poll shows that Trump supporters are more likely to be authoritarian, by asking respondents questions about parenting. I wondered about what if the was an "it depends on the situation - teach the kids to discern when a particular behaviour is appropriate" type of parent. I don't have kids but that's more or less how I was raised. I got both. That wasn't in the poll though. Regardless, I would definitely pick the less authoritarian, more open minded, easiest to work with, fair, weighs decisions in a balanced way but puts priority on helping the disadvantaged gain equality, smart, and sane as possible, leader. Whereas, there are people who actually really dig having an authoritarian leader for some weird reason. They expect that's what makes a leader.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/donald-trump-2016-authoritarian-213533
 
Last edited:
@Kimmio
You're authoritarian?
You want the govt (laws are part of the govt) to force people to think and act against their wishes regarding prostitution n assisted dying

Autboritarian aint necessarily evil tho
Look @ the 3 questions where the author determined whether the respondent was strongly authoritarian or not...remember the 3 questions?

Neet simple questions tho...adding that info to Frank Luntz s polls t means that the 40 per cent of merrycans who are going to vote for Trump who are the Blue Collar Workers are strongly authoritarian? Hmm :3
 
Back
Top