Well then (deleting my last point while I can) they don’t practice what they preach.Unlikely.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well then (deleting my last point while I can) they don’t practice what they preach.Unlikely.
Should they comment on every patient who has a rare health issue with expensive treatment who gets denied or discontinued for political or financial reasons despite the health benefits?Well then (deleting my last point while I can) they don’t practice what they preach.
It isn't depoliliticize by the category of a forum. it is only depoliticized if people choose not to name those things where ever the discussion happens to land.It shouldn’t be depoliticized by putting it into health and aging. It takes attention away from the UN concerns etc. people looking for political discussion about it might miss it etc.
This is a benchmark case. She’s the first in the world to have funding for this medication cut. It’s a deliberate political move. The precedent takes us in a very very bad direction and if UCCan doesn’t say something they repeat mistakes of history.Should they comment on every patient who has a rare health issue with expensive treatment who gets denied or discontinued for political or financial reasons despite the health benefits?
if people are doing searches for political discussion on the topic it should be under politics. The statement is political not health related.It isn't depoliliticize by the category of a forum. it is only depoliticized if people choose not to name those things where ever the discussion happens to land.
see post aboveShould they comment on every patient who has a rare health issue with expensive treatment who gets denied or discontinued for political or financial reasons despite the health benefits?
Maybe some feel that is placed there it will mellow and then be more palatable ...It shouldn’t be depoliticized by putting it into health and aging. It takes attention away from the UN concerns etc. people looking for political discussion about it might miss it etc.
Should they comment on every patient who has a rare health issue with expensive treatment who gets denied or discontinued for political or financial reasons despite the health benefits?