TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?
- Thread starter crazyheart
- Start date
Welcome to Wondercafe2!
A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!
Graeme Decarie
Well-Known Member
Nice guy, John Moore.
Graeme Decarie
Well-Known Member
I must add that he really had to leave. We were on CJAD, far the biggest anglo radio talk station. It's now the ONLY private anglo radio station - and it has no talk. just music that's assigned to it by a head office in Toronto. And John is a talk radio man.
I always found talk radio a better way to communicate than either TV or print. It requires the listener to concentrate on the voice and the message. It does it so well, that strangers would often talk to me as if I were a regular visitor in their homes. TV is just moving colours and shapes requiring no concentration, no imagining. As for newsprint, most readers turn off after a paragraph or so.
I always found talk radio a better way to communicate than either TV or print. It requires the listener to concentrate on the voice and the message. It does it so well, that strangers would often talk to me as if I were a regular visitor in their homes. TV is just moving colours and shapes requiring no concentration, no imagining. As for newsprint, most readers turn off after a paragraph or so.
I didn't know John Moore although by the following name he could be part of the relations all uplands and downs the coast.
Could he be related to Davis Moore? He was a boxer ... contained stars ... he could see them when hit unbeknownst ... ever hit that way by powers beyond ... greater things?
There are those that do not believe in greater things that go on and on ... eternal? Some use this stretch as a weapon of fear when some followers say one shouldn't fear the stranger ... unless they are an unknowing Christian ... limited del eight?
These could be notable or marked in the book for a day of extinguishment by dark dun kings ... browned off populations of paradigmatic curves as they swell. Even the well-sroo' d find their NDs ... non-determinate places as if abstract ... thus there must be Moor ...
QED (a phi in eddais, KISS'Me gutte Niche, and the swirl is stirred)
Could he be related to Davis Moore? He was a boxer ... contained stars ... he could see them when hit unbeknownst ... ever hit that way by powers beyond ... greater things?
There are those that do not believe in greater things that go on and on ... eternal? Some use this stretch as a weapon of fear when some followers say one shouldn't fear the stranger ... unless they are an unknowing Christian ... limited del eight?
These could be notable or marked in the book for a day of extinguishment by dark dun kings ... browned off populations of paradigmatic curves as they swell. Even the well-sroo' d find their NDs ... non-determinate places as if abstract ... thus there must be Moor ...
QED (a phi in eddais, KISS'Me gutte Niche, and the swirl is stirred)
Ever feel at rest when falling intuit? They say every man should have one ... 2 wit with so we might learn something ... given our tendencies to knot .. without knowledge of disentanglement theory ... some say disambiguation, or some other word ! Things we poorly understand? Dark S' moors and sm' ears for humanity ...
To Graeme Decarie, yes John Moore went to the Toronto radio station as morning man about 10 years ago. He and Andrew Carter (at CJAD) have a 5-minute chat every morning Mon-Fri at 6:47 a.m.. John Moore does interviews that are played on CJAD Saturday afternoons around 4:00 p.m. CJAD is still a talk radio show although yes, they do play a few bars of music at the beginning of the programs but there is still a lot of talk. Not the professional talk of the CBC station but very topical to Montreal issues and often beyond. I even heard you interviewed not too long ago, maybe a bit before Christmas. The panels on each 'star's' show are usually the most informative and interesting. You should tune in through the internet! By the way, I like your new-format blog.
Welcome to the insanity J Isle ... another island of data ... to be consumed ... but secretly as the polity says we shouldn't know ... tis a secret society even thought they know not ... they've lost their sense of detailed sounds ... silence in the phonetics? O' the Sounds of Silence ... so calm passion 'd ...
Graeme Decarie
Well-Known Member
Is tommy Shnurmaker still at CJAD?
To get back to Donald Trump, he's not worse than Cruz - or Hillary. They all have pretty much the same ideas, and they all serve the same money masters. He is simply one more move in moving real life into cartoon TV images. And real life is left to spin out of control. This may be the world's first empire to collapse because of TV.
To get back to Donald Trump, he's not worse than Cruz - or Hillary. They all have pretty much the same ideas, and they all serve the same money masters. He is simply one more move in moving real life into cartoon TV images. And real life is left to spin out of control. This may be the world's first empire to collapse because of TV.
Radio [=] talk takes me back to my years in the field - CKAR in Oshawa, CKLY in Lindsay.
Anyway - Trump is scary
Graeme Decarie
Well-Known Member
I miss both radio and teaching.
But, at last, Pr. Jae has sent us a real pin-up photo of himself. And, in the photo portion at least, semi-nude.
But, at last, Pr. Jae has sent us a real pin-up photo of himself. And, in the photo portion at least, semi-nude.
Pontifex Geronimo 13
#walkaway
Is it true that only a criminal can know a criminal because one needs to be familiar with the attributes thereof? Thus like forces are drawn into turbulence ... a kin to chaos theory?
Tag a PG a dais ... and take eM to the market ...
Delightful Life
M&M, Cascadian Lovers
- Pronouns
- She/Her/Her
Here's some facts that cut through the rhetoric (Truth will set you free)
the rate at which the federal deficit is changing, called the 2nd derivative of debt, has been accelerating during almost every annum of every republican administration since Eisenhower
in every Democrat administration, that crucial # has gone down
lets hope that people vote for Truth and not their feelings and what they have been lied to is True...
hard thing to do, but worth it -- who knew that Dems were vital & good for the US economy? What's more important, your ('you' in the sense of the American voter) feelings or America's (and your fellow human being's life etc) economy?
(note that this isn't an endorsement on my part for hillary)
the rate at which the federal deficit is changing, called the 2nd derivative of debt, has been accelerating during almost every annum of every republican administration since Eisenhower
in every Democrat administration, that crucial # has gone down
lets hope that people vote for Truth and not their feelings and what they have been lied to is True...
hard thing to do, but worth it -- who knew that Dems were vital & good for the US economy? What's more important, your ('you' in the sense of the American voter) feelings or America's (and your fellow human being's life etc) economy?
(note that this isn't an endorsement on my part for hillary)
Last edited:
Graeme Decarie
Well-Known Member
Well, Hillary is now being investigated by the FBI in a case that seems sure to lead to criminal charges.
And Hillary and Bill have both been getting extremely wealthy out of politics - just as Tony Blair did in Britain. (Bush and Blair should both have been tried for war crimes. There's no doubt they are guilty of them. And they should be hanged as has been customary with such crimes committed by the other side.)
Hillary gets huge fees for giving little speeches - sometimes hundreds of thousands for a 15 minute speech. This is the new method of slipping money to corrupt politicians.
American politics and government contracting have always been corrupt in the U.S. But it's now gone far past the standards of even the 1950s. Eisenhower warned of this, and he was right. Aid money, military contracts are far beyond any control. In fact, aid money, most of it, ends up in the pockets of private contractors who 'spend' most of it in 'conducting studies'. That's why Haiti and Iraq got almost none of the aid money supposedly sent to them. The Bush family has made its fortune out of government deals and being in government for at least three generations.
The Clintons are very much a part of that moral rot.
And Hillary and Bill have both been getting extremely wealthy out of politics - just as Tony Blair did in Britain. (Bush and Blair should both have been tried for war crimes. There's no doubt they are guilty of them. And they should be hanged as has been customary with such crimes committed by the other side.)
Hillary gets huge fees for giving little speeches - sometimes hundreds of thousands for a 15 minute speech. This is the new method of slipping money to corrupt politicians.
American politics and government contracting have always been corrupt in the U.S. But it's now gone far past the standards of even the 1950s. Eisenhower warned of this, and he was right. Aid money, military contracts are far beyond any control. In fact, aid money, most of it, ends up in the pockets of private contractors who 'spend' most of it in 'conducting studies'. That's why Haiti and Iraq got almost none of the aid money supposedly sent to them. The Bush family has made its fortune out of government deals and being in government for at least three generations.
The Clintons are very much a part of that moral rot.
Graeme Decarie
Well-Known Member
Nothing lies like statistics. Both parties are funded by the same billionaires. Both parties give the same favours. Both parties have essentially the same foreign policy. American democracy ended a long time ago. I'm not sure it ever existed.
Graeme Decarie
Well-Known Member
I should add that private news media in Canada, the U.S. and most of Europe are as corrupt as anything that Herr Goebbels ran. I don't know of any private TV news outlets in North America that tell the truth though Fox news is, without doubt, the worst.
The only news outlets I trust are The Guardian in Britain, el Haaretz in Israel, al Jazeera. CBC is better than all the private news media - but it has to be cautious because of government interference. I've seen it happen many times. BBC has been dead meat for some years.
Even the big names can't be trusted. The New York Times, the Washington Post, The Globe, all stay within limits. And our National Post is a pure propaganda piece. Of news magazines, probably the best by far is The Economist - though it has a bias. MacLean's and Time are quite worthless.
The only news outlets I trust are The Guardian in Britain, el Haaretz in Israel, al Jazeera. CBC is better than all the private news media - but it has to be cautious because of government interference. I've seen it happen many times. BBC has been dead meat for some years.
Even the big names can't be trusted. The New York Times, the Washington Post, The Globe, all stay within limits. And our National Post is a pure propaganda piece. Of news magazines, probably the best by far is The Economist - though it has a bias. MacLean's and Time are quite worthless.
chansen
Had a point all along
- Pronouns
- He/Him/His
Graeme, I quite agree with a lot of your observations, but what can be done? We've got this great communication medium, and the impressive bandwidth is being used for pictures of the Kardashian family.
There is good, non-tinfoil-hat-wearing discussions about things like the real source of terrorist funding (Saudi Arabia - our friendly allies!) and other things our leadership would rather not make the news, but how do we go about bring it to the public consciousness? There is rational discussion taking place. How do we elevate it?
Preferably without resorting to conspiracy site style tactics.
There is good, non-tinfoil-hat-wearing discussions about things like the real source of terrorist funding (Saudi Arabia - our friendly allies!) and other things our leadership would rather not make the news, but how do we go about bring it to the public consciousness? There is rational discussion taking place. How do we elevate it?
Preferably without resorting to conspiracy site style tactics.
Graeme Decarie
Well-Known Member
I am damned if I know. For a start, there is only a very weak Christian tradition of open discussion, and of discussing reactions to the real world in the context of religious principles. And there is an even weaker tradition when it comes to open discussion of our society in that context. Evangelicals, for example, will stand in righteous zeal with posters denouncing abortion - but wouldn't dream of opposing the mass murder of war. Then, it's praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.
There is (or was) such a tradition of discussion in Judaism. It has suffered a good deal from pressures imposed by the Zionist lobby - very noticeable in the Cote St. Luc newspaper, and in the Eleanor London Library (now a place that would have Eleanor London spitting nails'.
People want to be accepted. Having an informed opinion or being in any way critical puts their acceptability at risk. That is very, very noticeable in Atlantic Canada. And I've found it generally true of church-goers, too many of whom equate church-going with respectability - and not much more than that.
Synagogues, most of them in my experience, were very open to discussion. I don't know whether that's still true.
when I gave a speech in a church, I noticed that the audience wanted, essentially, entertainment. When I gave one in a synagogue, I knew I had better have something to spark debate.
Given the nature of our society, going to church should not make one respectable. it should make one a strong critic of our society and, therefore, quite unrespectable.
Oh, how I miss the old, Jewish community of Montreal!
I write a daily blog about the appalling quality of our local newspapers. It has a steady following - though the following is actually bigger in Germany and Russia than in Canada. Go figure.
And I get very few comments, thought I know I have hundreds of readers here in New Brunswick. And I've learned I get few comments because people are afraid of their names being associated with criticism. And, even of the few comments, most don't give their real names.
There is (or was) such a tradition of discussion in Judaism. It has suffered a good deal from pressures imposed by the Zionist lobby - very noticeable in the Cote St. Luc newspaper, and in the Eleanor London Library (now a place that would have Eleanor London spitting nails'.
People want to be accepted. Having an informed opinion or being in any way critical puts their acceptability at risk. That is very, very noticeable in Atlantic Canada. And I've found it generally true of church-goers, too many of whom equate church-going with respectability - and not much more than that.
Synagogues, most of them in my experience, were very open to discussion. I don't know whether that's still true.
when I gave a speech in a church, I noticed that the audience wanted, essentially, entertainment. When I gave one in a synagogue, I knew I had better have something to spark debate.
Given the nature of our society, going to church should not make one respectable. it should make one a strong critic of our society and, therefore, quite unrespectable.
Oh, how I miss the old, Jewish community of Montreal!
I write a daily blog about the appalling quality of our local newspapers. It has a steady following - though the following is actually bigger in Germany and Russia than in Canada. Go figure.
And I get very few comments, thought I know I have hundreds of readers here in New Brunswick. And I've learned I get few comments because people are afraid of their names being associated with criticism. And, even of the few comments, most don't give their real names.
Silence in the media about human ludic racy ... the race to be luddites in the temple ... much opposed by the polity that doesn't like the sound of laughter in the temple ... as they take the humour personally (something about lack of confidence that is covered up in a robe or fabric). Something one should get clear of and sink internally ... ever get that feeling when in the physical temple that demands silence, darkness and naïveté to what goes on in the dark?
When the robe flies is it a sign of some rye intercourse ... bare fax copied in the folds of the grated mind as it blows ...
Many believe not in the grater .. or even what is scuffed off this unbelievably large thing that deals with eternal probabilities ... it manifests as non-statistical ... no information on the far out ... as we 're not there yet!
When the robe flies is it a sign of some rye intercourse ... bare fax copied in the folds of the grated mind as it blows ...
Many believe not in the grater .. or even what is scuffed off this unbelievably large thing that deals with eternal probabilities ... it manifests as non-statistical ... no information on the far out ... as we 're not there yet!