TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

The green phlegm thing has long since been dealt with, cured, and is no longer relevant. The nasty thing who says nasty things is still around. I would submit that the nasty thing who says nasty things is much less dignified that working through a serious illness.
 
That is the decision Americans had to make? That is what the election was all about? So, JAE, you have decided that Americans are a nation of morons?

Well, maybe so.

Is chaos in morons a form of disassociation and antisocialism or just mentally disoriented as their head swims ...
 
Does anyone but me find the rev's predictions very masculine in nature?
Since he is speaking about male leaders I am not seeing it. Anyway I find his outlook on the relations between Trump and Kim Jun Un overly optimistic but one can always hope.
 
The environment surrounding the topic is this enclosing and thus feminine in ring ... like de belles clanking ! Morley's chains ...
 
Hillary Clinton will bring forward more progressive ideas? Because women have a more feminist tone? Get real. There is nothing in her record to suggest anything but more of the same. Women are different from men? Yeah. Women like Margaret Thatcher and Bloody Mary. And I can't helped noticing that the butchery of Muslims in Rohingya is being carried out by a woman.
Someone other than Hillary in 2020, I said - to set a 'new' tone.

I guess you didn't read my post - about Al Franken?
 
They do because they have to, to be heard, in the male dominated realm.


The dark unseen force ... and it is said that God didn't make honky tonk angels ... strange women to raise curiosity regarding their mysteries? Nightingales ... sort of a parallel to Guinness ... grin and bare ... :D ... troth eMs ... thus sacrificed for a break in awareness ... like a good nites rest ... the remnant is refreshing face against the rising one ... a masque?
 
Powerful woman take on male traits ... thus giving direction to partisan-ism in humility ... a subtle item ...

They do because they have to, to be heard, in the male dominated realm.

Powerful women are capable of taking on some of the male traits that might just be seen as strong leadership traits. They have been seen as male because men have traditionally held those positions. I do not believe they need to become co-opted into maleness as a way to cope. Margaret Thatcher did not have to become more "male" in order to become a good leader. Ayn Rand did not have to either. They believed in a certain political ideology and followed that. It is very possible to follow a neoliberal paradigm and be female. It is time to stop blaming the male dominance and own our own power.
 
Why the Hebrew god gave Hadassah a gentile soft side as an advocate of baiting ... as some trolls use to stimulate naïveté and some use them to raise interest and curiosity in the unknown ... don't knock it? The unknown psyche is moor than you'd conceive on a mortal domain ... somewhat bazaar .. or even suffering vert Egos in the trees ... so much to learn in the inky sectors ... under the shade of the tree of Logos ... dark and unknown to those of one side of the baffled separation ... as Lenard Cohen said .. a baffled Lord ... due to la Deis? Alternate idealism!

Is that divine or just split ...
 
Last edited:
Powerful women are capable of taking on some of the male traits that might just be seen as strong leadership traits. They have been seen as male because men have traditionally held those positions. I do not believe they need to become co-opted into maleness as a way to cope. Margaret Thatcher did not have to become more "male" in order to become a good leader. Ayn Rand did not have to either. They believed in a certain political ideology and followed that. It is very possible to follow a neoliberal paradigm and be female. It is time to stop blaming the male dominance and own our own power.
No. I don't think it is. Thatcher may not have had to be more masculine to be a good leader. She did have to be so, in order to be elected. If she wasn't seen almost like "one of the boys" she would never have risen in politics - so she honed that.
 
In this world - love, gentleness, patience, forgiveness, nurturing, compassion - are not seen as qualities that make for good political "leadership". You have to be tough! You have to be unforgiving. You have to be driven and competitive and unflinching.

Great.
 
That is the decision Americans had to make? That is what the election was all about? So, JAE, you have decided that Americans are a nation of morons?

Well, maybe so.
Morons, yes, who voted against their personal interests becuase they likes the guy from The Apprentice or were simply dazzled by a guy with a sublime combover.

But don't forget the Bigots, who don't like Mexicans, Muslims, Jews or black people who rise above their station.

And then there's just the Jerks, who would benefit from the same low taxes and reduced environmental plan that benefits Donald Trump and other rich people, at a cost to everyone else. The Morons just don't understand this and voted for Trump. The Jerks understand this, and voted for Trump.
 
Back
Top