TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Graeme Decarie said:
The thing to watch might be the attack on a double agent in Britain. (A spy who works for both sides and betrays both sides.)
The British pm has immediately blamed Russia for it, taken extreme steps, even warlike ones (as though Britain never kills spies) and has had strong support from Trump. There's smell about this one. It makes no sense that Russia would try to kill a man with a poison made only in Russia - a dead giveaway I should think - when it could more easily have used one made in Britain, or even just shot him. I think we're being set up for something.
Click to expand...
it fits in with the Russian Collusion Psyop theory...
 
Graeme Decarie said:
The thing to watch might be the attack on a double agent in Britain. (A spy who works for both sides and betrays both sides.)
The British pm has immediately blamed Russia for it, taken extreme steps, even warlike ones (as though Britain never kills spies) and has had strong support from Trump. There's smell about this one. It makes no sense that Russia would try to kill a man with a poison made only in Russia - a dead giveaway I should think - when it could more easily have used one made in Britain, or even just shot him. I think we're being set up for something.
Click to expand...

Of course, you could argue that it's such a dead giveaway that it makes no sense that the UK or US would poison a guy with a poison made only in Russia and then blame the Russians when everyone knows that doing so would be a dead giveaway that it couldn't be the Russians because they wouldn't give themselves away by using a poison made in Russia.
 
Possible. We are left, though, with the reality that both British and American governments have reacted with extreme and even warlike measures against something that all countries, especially Britain and the U.S., routinely do.
 
revsdd said:
Of course, you could argue that it's such a dead giveaway that it makes no sense that the UK or US would poison a guy with a poison made only in Russia and then blame the Russians when everyone knows that doing so would be a dead giveaway that it couldn't be the Russians because they wouldn't give themselves away by using a poison made in Russia.
Click to expand...

Of course it wasn't the Russians or the Brits.

It was KAOS a Delaware Corporation (for tax reasons naturally).

If it wasn't so I wouldn't be texting you on my shoe phone.
 
Yet there are people that say chaos and darkness no not exist ... leaving some of us distraught over seeing the holes in what's well laid out as materialistic ...
 
We know Trump is a liar and I am sure Justin knows he's a liar but it

pisses me off that an American President can do such things and the American people

let him.
 
Well, well.. the poisoned double agent case gets more interesting.

The agent was small time. The Russians arrested him, and gave him the very light penalty of 13 years. Then, instead, they released him to live in Britain. It's very unusual to pat a spy and traitor on the head and let him go. Obviously, he was VERY small time.

So why would they later kill him? And why by such an elaborate means?

As for the factory that made that gas, it was not entirely a Russian affair. The ownership of that factory is or was American!
(Yes. Americans do make chemical poisons for war.)

Meanwhile, British Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn is defying the government and the public, and telling them to cool it. He sees lots of questions in this whole story. What we are watching is a manufactured hysteria. I don't know what this is about. But it's very, very dangerous.

And it seems odd that Trump was slow get on the bandwagon. And that the Canadian government has yet to say a word.
 
Last edited:
Our news media have been lavish in reporting on statements of how cruel and illegal it was for Russia (so our leaders say) to attempt the murder of a double agent - and, gasp, using chemical poison.

Why wasn't our press so active on the use of a chemical poison by the U.S. in Vietnam? (Agent Orange).

Why no finger pointing at the U.S. (illegal) invasions of 70 countries?

Where's the indignation that the U.S. continues to practice illegal torture all over the world? And the new head of the CIA is a motherly type who used to be the chief torturer?

Why haven't our news media examined the obvious lie that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction? The lie makes that war and the killing of one and a half million people quite illegal.

Read or heard much about the forced starvation of millions in Yemen? Is Canada proposing any sanctions?

The presence of U.S. troops in Syria is illegal under international law. Heard about that in the news?

When will our news media recognize the reality? We are the Naziis of our time. That is not an overstatement. That is reality. Our side is exactly the same as the Naziis of World War Two.

But there's no righteousness like self righteousness.
 
If an agent doubly dosed with toxin ... would a second regeneration required ... such venom ...

Could be a Nu world theme ... conspiracy if you note the metaphors ... generates pure chaos ... but then ... it was directed some millennia ago ... "the common people shouldn't know" --- some patriarch!
 
The British government announced in the opening seconds of this story that the poison came from a russian lab, and it is the only one known to produce it.

The latest news is that British researchers have been unable to determine where the poison came from. Not that it matters. I should think our news media as they wax indignant would have known that the U.S. dumped thousands of tons of poison on Vietnam in the form of Agent Orange. That was quite illegal under international law.

It is starving the people of Yemen to death. That is illegal under international law.

It has invaded 70 countries without legal reason. That is against international law. It's presence in Syria is against international law.

It invasion of Iraq, killing one and half million, was based on lies. That is against international law.

The new head of the CIA is a woman who operated torture camps. That is against international law.

The US and Britain, since 1945, have been the biggest war criminals in the world.

Now, we are being whipped into a frenzy on the basis of reports that seem simply not true. I don't know what the purpose of this is or where it will take us. But I think we are in an extremely dangerous situation. And we have to rely on news media that simply report what they are told to report.

At some point, the Christian churches are going to have to deal with the evil we have turned on the earth since 1945.

But they probably won't.
 
And I'm not sure that Christian churches, except those operating in a strictly hierarchical environment, are equipped to do that. Our congregation, honestly, doesn't have the influence to operate beyond an "all candidates meeting" where all candidates are asked "social justice type" questions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top