TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Kimmio said:
....click arrow for original quote Citizen...
Click to expand...
Understand him before you know...he actually was in danger just because of his posts in trying to uncover Trump's methods. He has lost some business because of it. He has had to endorse Clinton to prevent a Clinton supporter from hurting or even killing him. It has worked as he is no longer getting threats.

Read him as someone who is trying to understand how human beings operate. He creates multiple hypotheses and then see how well they account for reality.

Like here: http://blog.dilbert.com/post/146945783646/the-crook-versus-the-racist

Here is him in support of that young black fellow who didn't stand during the US anthem.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/150087546586/the-time-i-took-sides-with-black-lives-matter-and
 
Last edited:
He was threatened by Clinton supporters for uncovering, or trying to, *Trump's* methods, you say? Did I get that right?

Clarification please. Any proof? Was this just one messed up individual?

And how is saying that he had to do it, under duress - an actual endorsement of Clinton? (it's not)
 
Last edited:
Inannawhimsey said:
Understand him before you know...he actually was in danger just because of his posts in trying to uncover Trump's methods. He has lost some business because of it. He has had to endorse Clinton to prevent a Clinton supporter from hurting or even killing him. It has worked as he is no longer getting threats.

Read him as someone who is trying to understand how human beings operate. He creates multiple hypotheses and then see how well they account for reality.

Here is him in support of that young black fellow who didn't stand during the US anthem.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/150087546586/the-time-i-took-sides-with-black-lives-matter-and
Click to expand...

This monk has considered setting itself on fire in a public square to protest injustice but - given the attention span of most spectators -5 minutes of being taken seriously - as opposed to the rest of my life finessing my persuasion skills - not a fair trade.

And now I am aware of Scott Adams - I have so much to learn!

Kimmio said:
He was threatened by Clinton supporters for uncovering, or trying to, *Trump's* methods, you say? Did I get that right?

Clarification please. Any proof? Was this just one messed up individual?

And how is saying that he had to do it, under duress - an actual endorsement of Clinton? (it's not)
Click to expand...

He has lost speaking engagements because of it - fortunately the Alex Jones Show - where all are allowed to speak even if they have been censored by say an individual 'Clinton supporter' (they are all messed up) - is happy to allow him to speak - and to a much wider audience than the mainstream media to boot!

You are right it is not an actual endorsement - that is the point.

Note: I (Scott Adams) endorsed Hillary Clinton – for my personal safety – because I live in California. It isn’t safe to be viewed as a Trump supporter where I live. My politics don’t align with either candidate, but backing Clinton reduces my odds of dying at the hands of my fellow citizens. (And yes, I am 100% serious. It just happens to be funny by coincidence.)
 
Monk

Enjoy!

Some keywords
Moist Robot
Master persuader
Wizard
Crazy clown
Hypnosis
Confirmation bias
Cognitive trap
Cognitive dissonance
 
Last edited:
Ever consider that maybe he is employing those persuasion and hypnosis tactics with his audience? Mind control...bwahahaha!

Anyway...I once considered making an oversized tinfoil hat and standing on the street corner but other than getting laughed at I really didn't know what the point would be. Maybe to start a fashion trend?
 
Trump is without scruples as he spouts off calls to be non-inclusive and self serving. Fear is his glue and the icing is a vanilla
kind of sugary coating. The cake will taste good at first, but not for long. It's exclusive stance is a kind of incest...loving only
those who agree.
That spills into a pool of non descript people angry and ignorant of anyone but themselves and their own needs. If he gains power he will want more of it. He could cut off the USA by fear alone. That causes cancers in the heart and soul of democracy..

That will end up splitting themselves and them splitting from a sane seeking world. I think we are trying to be more sane, more accepting, more human. It is showing up but you have to look for it.. And we are charged by faith to keep on being faithful to Spiritual growth and to loving each other. Even Trump needs the love that created him.

Where has the power of serving the people gone? Serving.... is the operative word here. He has no sense of the job as the head of a country. It is not about self aggrandizement, though that's what I hear from him. Self has to be in the background, and the people
...all the people in the fore ground. But not seeking only for themselves. They are broken as we are already needing to include
more of the people, First Nations, the African people they brought over as slaves, and all other immigrants. They are a country, as Canada is, of immigrants. Only First Nations are non immigrants...

His sense of duty is aggressive and he seems to be a war monger. Putin will be happy with that stance. he wants to take over the world... on the QT of course.

But, no matter what I think, or you think,. we do need to pray for a holy sanity to prevail and a sense of wholeness and unity. I don't think he is right in saying the States is not well, he is blind to what is already good and trustworthy.
A dangerous stance for the rest of the world.

So, I agree when we pray to be including all the people and those running and those backing them to be at peace within themselves.
When we are at peace within, we are close to the Source, the God of love. And it is very difficult to be angry when we are
connected to such a peaceable love.

Has anyone been listening to The Summer of Peace Summit? I think it's from the States... so there are people working for peace in spite of those who are unaware...like Trump. Thank God. May their message take hold and prosper.

The SOP link is: http://summerofpeace.net/program?summit=2

In prayer also ...



 
Kimmio said:
Ever consider that maybe he is employing those persuasion and hypnosis tactics with his audience? Mind control...bwahahaha!
Click to expand...

He has written several posts showing what hypnosis is and how it works and doesn't work...

In fact it was because of his skill with it that first led to him to pay more attention to Trump because he noticed him using certain techniques...Scott doesn't know for sure if Trump is consciously using hypnosis but what he sees is awfully similar to what he has learned

Here are some of his posts


http://blog.dilbert.com/post/102627971721/programming-the-moist-robot

http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/2007/07/hypnosis.html

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/145153992666/how-to-hypnotize-bill-maher

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/146157026376/how-to-un-hypnotize-a-rabid-anti-trumper

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ndslide-the-mind-behind-dilbert-explains-why/

Watch as hypnosis happens
http://www.dangerandplay.com/2016/03/06/watch-scott-adams-hypnotize-tucker-carlson-on-live-tv/

A list to help understand persuasion techniques used by Trump and Clinton's Godzilla
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/129784168866/the-persuasion-reading-list

Have fun and enjoy
 
Last edited:
With meticulous detail and an abundance of original research, Patrick M. Wood uses Technocracy Rising to connect the dots of modern globalization in a way that has never been seen before so that the reader can clearly understand the globalization plan, its perpetrators and its intended endgame.

In the heat of the Great Depression during the 1930s, prominent scientists and engineers proposed a utopian energy-based economic system called Technocracy that would be run by those same scientists and engineers instead of elected politicians. Although this radical movement lost momentum by 1940, it regained status when it was conceptually adopted by the elitist Trilateral Commission (co-founded by Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller) in 1973 to be become its so-called “New International Economic Order.”
 
monk said:
With meticulous detail and an abundance of original research, Patrick M. Wood uses Technocracy Rising to connect the dots of modern globalization in a way that has never been seen before so that the reader can clearly understand the globalization plan, its perpetrators and its intended endgame.

In the heat of the Great Depression during the 1930s, prominent scientists and engineers proposed a utopian energy-based economic system called Technocracy that would be run by those same scientists and engineers instead of elected politicians. Although this radical movement lost momentum by 1940, it regained status when it was conceptually adopted by the elitist Trilateral Commission (co-founded by Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller) in 1973 to be become its so-called “New International Economic Order.”
Click to expand...


@monk , did you write the description for the book on amazon?
https://www.amazon.ca/Technocracy-Rising-Trojan-Global-Transformation/dp/0986373907

If not, that I remind you of the wondercafe2 code of conduct point 7 which covers copyrighted material and intellectual property.
 
Pinga said:
If not, that I remind you of the wondercafe2 code of conduct point 7 which covers copyrighted material and intellectual property.
Click to expand...

Monk is hardly the worst offender here. Ever try separating sources from their own thoughts in an unsafe or airclean post?:rolleyes:

That said, if you're quoting material from somewhere, put it in quotes (or bracket it with quote tags if you know how) and include an attribution and you're good.
 
Mendalla said:
Monk is hardly the worst offender here. Ever try separating sources from their own thoughts in an unsafe or airclean post?:rolleyes:

That said, if you're quoting material from somewhere, put it in quotes (or bracket it with quote tags if you know how) and include an attribution and you're good.
Click to expand...
It also helps us if we want to read more of the person's work for ourselves...

*reading rainbow*
 
Is thought and source ... a state of confusion considering what we know about history ... considering people that believe it past and thus not worth considering any more than forethought of what will happen due to emotional activity?

Such is the future ... greatly unknown!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top