Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Jaebius

Well-Known Member
Pronouns
He/Him/His
Coming soon to a postsecondary institution near you...

genderunicorn1.jpg


How do you feel about such a thing? How would you respond?

Me...
GI: Male
GE: Masculine
Sex: Male
PAT: Women
EAT: Women

---
Edit: Sorry, I see I got the name of the unicorn wrong in the title of this thread. It's actually The Gender Unicorn.
 
As usual, they left out an option. For "Physically Attracted To" there should be a both/all option for bi/pansexuals. Probably should be one for Emotionally Attracted as well though I find many of the bi/pan people I've come across lean one or the other emotionally even if they have physical relationships with both/all.

GI: Male
GE: Tough call. There are elements of my personality that some might deem feminine but mostly Masculine, I think.
Sex at Birth: Male
PAT: Truth be told, there's a reason I commented on the lack of an option for bis.
EAT: Women

Edit: Sorry, I see I got the name of the unicorn wrong in the title of this thread. It's actually The Gender Unicorn.

Got that for you. :D
 
As usual, they left out an option. For "Physically Attracted To" there should be a both/all option for bi/pansexuals. Probably should be one for Emotionally Attracted as well though I find many of the bi/pan people I've come across lean one or the other emotionally even if they have physical relationships with both/all.

On the actual Gender Unicorn (it's a computerized thing...?) I feel you can slide the dots on the arrows to reflect your reality. Fr'instance, to reflect bisexuality, you could slide the PAT (and/or EAT) dots so that they're both over on the right hand side. Someone could also, say, slide the PAT dot on "Men" to the far-right, and the PAT dot on the "Women" to somewhere in the middle.

Mendalla said:
GE: Tough call. There are elements of my personality that some might deem feminine...

Yes, mine too (for me it's the the whole Fi-dom thing).

Mendalla said:
Got that for you. :D

Thanks.
 
On the actual Gender Unicorn (it's a computerized thing...?) I feel you can slide the dots on the arrows to reflect your reality. Fr'instance, to reflect bisexuality, you could slide the PAT (and/or EAT) dots so that they're both over on the right hand side. Someone could also, say, slide the PAT dot on "Men" to the far-right, and the PAT dot on the "Women" to somewhere in the middle.

Ah, that works perfectly then.
 
Choosing is a fey thing as corn when god said to love him ... everything included ... but man-gods deny this ... thus the human crack ... although some say it is a flaw ... it is said the Romans invented a throne with a hole when Pope Joan caused them embarrassment on their choice ... considering they couldn't see what was missing ... just another normal void ... due to the Robe ... that's another disconnected story ... disseminated ... as all was wished to be distributed evenly and unseen by the common pagans ... a sacred missal !

Contributes to the Theory of Everything ... which is nothing to those believed they're chosen ... perhaps to learn Beta ...
 
I've seen the same graphic as the "Genderbread Person". With a little ginger cookie cartoon person; same sliders. We used it in our "Conversations that Matter" about gender last week.
 
Yet still some cells continue to divide without outside assistance (asexual development) ... but God being emotional wished more phun and thus we ars crewed ... and the divers thing is still beyond us as to why! Is it Y's ... for deep sects, or should they remain shallow as a challenge for those that believe not in observation and science ... prescience, or sub-con science ... and that IDe o'm looking over you shoulder ...

Brae in cells are shared as what appears a snotty relationship of spilling brae'n sown ... sometimes known as phlogiston ... a messy confrontation? Something prehistorically faced ... but some don't go along with it ... and sops still reside ... things used to soak up the primitive soup .. some say evidence of bread states ... holy soakers?
 
@Luce NDs

Right now my entire screen of recent posts tells me you were the last to post on every thread with only two exceptions.

Sorry to say but you are seriously affecting my enjoyment of this site. Many have said that your posts are worth trying to decipher. And I have enjoyed several of your shorter, more understandable posts. But this is getting to be too much. Once again, I am outta here. Respectfully. :sneaky:
 
@Luce NDs

Right now my entire screen of recent posts tells me you were the last to post on every thread with only two exceptions.

Sorry to say but you are seriously affecting my enjoyment of this site. Many have said that your posts are worth trying to decipher. And I have enjoyed several of your shorter, more understandable posts. But this is getting to be too much. Once again, I am outta here. Respectfully. :sneaky:

OK Paradox ... I guess my reading and pondering everything is unacceptable and I should be denied entrance to the discussion ... a good Christian response is to tell wordy people to be gone .. silence is best! Tolerance has NOSH-ite here ...

And words to loose NDs of aspirations are out too ... way out to the people calmed or those dissonant ? So much for dreams of silent speech ... another paradox ... enigma poorly respected ... thus the silence creeps up on us and deathly quieted equanimity for all ... tis a wish of the maas ecce ...
 
@Luce NDs
Reading and pondering is perfectly acceptable, of course, and no one is trying to deny you entrance. Or suggesting you leave or be silent.

I just wish you would post more clearly so more of us could engage in conversation with you. You have a lot to offer.
 
I've been told quite sternly that clear thoughts are not allowed ... and some old Roman religious father(s) said the common people shouldn't know ... and thus partisan myths ... I am commonly distributed and often told to get out a Ms. Understood as psyche within amon ... male female hybrid as Maleficent? Could be just ABBA' dream. I have one ... explicat words get rid of thoughts before the rapture ... after a rapturous event ... I won't have any ... a solution for thinking folk ... dispose 've eM ... they're stranger than eL! We can only take one way at once ... then shifts ... night shirts! Word can be presumptuously off too .. as an icon of a strange psychic God. Can you see through this peculiar transparency? Tis like a hole in all that's unseen ...

Keeping the pagans stunned is good for powerful corruption ... it is widespread and a virtue ... all the unknown spread ... also inclusive in my God ... then he is possessive as gravitas ... nothing goes ... thus it is as I am!

We are gods and should behave as one grasp all you can from what predecessor Gods have excluded ... all thos omniscience moments when you believe it all in a flash ... that's gross insight coming by the dose 'NDs ... but small bit at a time ... for the brusque powers can't take much at once ... but it is good to expect that alternately as the myth comes to a conclusion of partisan ethics to counter moral attitudes that convene .. even if disagreeable and confined to the stern ... steerage from the rear ... could go quelle the thing ... a vessel of folks not knowing where the spiral cosmos is taking them?

Thus a turn around in all events ... isn Maine and NB this is an expression for those not admitting to being lost ... can you see such a thong if it is gone ... this too is a word that was used to describe me ... so I could be right out of here with all other's thoughts ... a collector, gatherer of odd things, or just a hoard Eire and not a host ...

I plainly belong to the unclear host ... not to be seen clearly ... like Jacob's kid ... a lesser goat ... my explicit thought projection diminishes me ... just a wee bit more and I can escape life ... generally a pain puttin gup with the not so inquisitive ...

An enigmatic word or just puzzle of God? Some fallout may be expected ... people don't like to known and don't wish to know ... thus intermediary sol ... out there ... not enough oddly!
 
I've been told quite sternly that clear thoughts are not allowed

And who, pray tell, at WC2 has told you that clear thoughts are not allowed? All I remember is people - including me - asking for real dialogue with you in a way that we can understand and engage with.

You've been better in recent weeks. You've been posting more clearly at least some of the time, and you and I have been able to engage a handful of times, but I have noticed you slipping back lately - and I think one problem Paradox 3 noted has been, once again, the volume of posts - that you often feel the need to post on every single thread that's going in a way that doesn't further discussion because so much of what you write is so cryptic. Even those who rush to your defence don't engage with you.

Just talk to us. Clear thoughts are allowed. That doesn't mean everyone will agree with your opinion or my opinion or anyone's opinion on everything - but that's called discussion. Just talk to us. No one on this site has told you "quite sternly that clear thoughts are not allowed," so I wish you'd stop lumping us in with whoever it is who has told you that.

Now, the last 6 posts (including mine, I confess) are essentially a derail. Hopefully this can be put back on track.
 
God is a mystery ... an enigma and that's the word when in the caldron with a host of people ... they like rivalry!

Let the games go on even for the stranger amusing self with conjectures of sol ... tis like a hermit age ... being rejected by people that say they know Gods ... but people are strange too ... so fit in ... continue as status quo ... as you are God stated I am ... for the eternal is there too ...

Life is always tough, and always will be, as a domain created for the physically tough, brusque thinkers must attend to observe .. some don't .. they just can't accept that live is a humanity make it ... an those some are non humanitarian ... or inhuman states?

Thats the word if you can interpret the human side of chaos ... is there a greater sol? Some say a larger thought would be gross and thus rejected if explicit ... the consequence is all the words lost over the years ... a dark pool to investigate ... but one shouldn't speak of it ... writ is quieter and people will complain about how that overwhelms them with a flood of darkness ...

It is an illustration of the unknown and unseen though ... not well accepted as a mental state! Thus such intelligence is said to be out there like satyrs and metaphors ... in a heated midsummer nights aspiration ... from that school of Shakespearean Spin (English) that conjured up the word games ... lyrics, lines, linguistics and all that Poo that ... OhBothers ... OBI't .. and then he wasn't ... everything goes to make room for evolution ... in word and thought Eve 'n ...
 
I think it's interesting how some of one's positions on the assorted scales can change as one progresses through the continuum of time. I think I'm at a point in my life right now when I can honestly say that my romantic attraction to either gender is zero. "Romance" is a bit of a crock cooked up by Hallmark and the chocolate companies.
 
God love the stranger among us ... some say a tin man because some would like to starve the genie out ... thus than red line of the divining! He could be stuffed with the last straws ... tinder for the next flame? Thus we alight elsewhere ... none knows ...

But still a part of God space .. an eternal expanse poorly understood ... but you're not allowed to say this to professional authorities ... they are certified differently ... or just divined?

The red lyon continues ... as heated lyrics poorly mist, understood as subtle?
 
"Romance" is a bit of a crock cooked up by Hallmark and the chocolate companies.

I would agree if it weren't for the fact that romance was well established in literature long before there was a Hallmark. They have co-opted it for their commercial purposes, but true romance is hardly a commercial crock. Unless you can show that Jane Austen was working for Hallmark. Or Shakespeare, for that matter. I would argue that dismissing romance because of its co-option by industry is wrong-headed and just lets them have their way. We should be reclaiming it and returning to its original purpose - celebrating deep, interpersonal, and, yes, sometimes erotic connections between human beings of all genders, orientations, etc. Forget Hallmark and so on. On Valentine's Day, read Much Ado About Nothing, do something special for your special someone that doesn't involve buying stuff (other than maybe buying food to cook them a special meal), or whatever. We can be romantic without Hallmark et al. Let's show them that instead of getting cynical about it. I am cynical about politics and many other things, but I draw the line at Love.
 
Last edited:
I would agree if it weren't for the fact that romance was well established in literature long before there was a Hallmark. They have co-opted it for their commercial purposes, but true romance is hardly a commercial crock. Unless you can show that Jane Austen was working for Hallmark. Or Shakespeare, for that matter. I would argue that dismissing romance because of it's co-option by industry is wrong-headed and just let's them have their way. We should be reclaiming it and returning to its original purpose - celebrating deep, interpersonal, and, yes, sometimes erotic connections between human beings (of all genders, orientations, etc.). Forget Hallmark and so on. On Valentine's Day, read Much Ado About Nothing, do something special for your special someone that doesn't involve buying stuff (other than maybe buying food to cook them a special meal), or whatever. We can be romantic without Hallmark et al. Let's show them that instead of getting cynical about it. I am cynical about politics and many other things, but I draw the line at Love.

Shakespeare in Love (with word) is real as a school of thought ... often dismissed by the status quo that doesn't wish to know of strange powers ... tis rapturous and can cause wild tears in the night ... climbing of ladders and letting hair down from platform edges, singing of arias, other whispers, etc.
 
I think it's awesome that there is more awareness of the complexity of these issues than there used to be.
 
I think it's awesome that there is more awareness of the complexity of these issues than there used to be.

Some remain in denial of composition while searching the simple flaws ... so keep your ass inside a structure at night ... or the bares could get eM!
 
Back
Top