The Church Vs. The State Civil Disobedience

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
PilgrimsProgress said:
They had the courage to stand up to the freedom bleaters, who, imo, were acting like adolescents not allowed out on a Saturday night.
Click to expand...
How nicely you ignore the reality of the harm done by lockdowns ... by just never acknowledging it. Just a bunch of adolescents not let out on a Saturday night? I don't think that is a very comprehensive evaluation ... we shall see.
 
Ritafee said:

Strict three-week lockdown needed to stop explosive COVID-19 variant growth, Ontario science table says​

Colin D'Mello'Mello
Colin D'MelloQueen's Park Bureau Chief and Videojournalist, CTV News Toronto
@ColinDMello Contact
Published Wednesday, March 17, 2021 3:16PM EDTLast Updated Thursday, March 18, 2021 11:10AM EDT
Click to expand...

Again you just cut and paste articles. No commentary. You do love being alarmist don't you. :rolleyes:
 
Ritafee said:

Strict three-week lockdown needed to stop explosive COVID-19 variant growth, Ontario science table says​

Colin D'Mello'Mello
Colin D'MelloQueen's Park Bureau Chief and Videojournalist, CTV News Toronto
@ColinDMello Contact
Published Wednesday, March 17, 2021 3:16PM EDTLast Updated Thursday, March 18, 2021 11:10AM EDT
Click to expand...

What the article actually recommends is a more comprehensive "lockdown" (and we're using this word wyrdly, as people in "lockdown" can go out for outside walking/exercise, to get groceries, drugs, alcohol. They gotta order their pot on-line) for three weeks, for just the "Golden Horseshoe", such a dense demographic.
 
Gotta love the ransom note posting style, though. :LOL: I know right away which posts not to read. It has the opposite effect as I believe Rita intends.

Correction: ransom note
 
Last edited:
You can work, off-site or on-site, if you're essential.

You can't socialize, except outside, distanced and masked. How is that "lockdown"?

You can access medical/alt medical/dental treatment.

You can't get your nails or your hair done.

How is that lockdown?
 
Kimmio Laughterlove said:
Listen to those who are vulnerable to the disease.'
Click to expand...
So those who are vulnerable to the 'disease' override those who are damaged by the 'experimental injections' then. If I am vulnerable to the 'disease' as modeling predicts I am ... I should support experimental procedures be imposed on the 'healthy' population to protect me from my own responsiblility? Responsibility to boost my own immune system through proper diet exercise and common sense ... as in if I am fearful of spreading or of getting the 'disease' ... I can modify my own behavior ... not everyone elses.
 
BetteTheRed said:
In Canada, not so much.

Even in this thread, the person wasn't fined or imprisoned for violating "lockdown" parameters. It was because he insisted it was safe for an entire congregation to worship each week - WITHOUT masks, without social distancing (which means capacity limits; in our sanctuary, it is 60). That's NOT lockdown; those are temporary preventive public health measures, such as were employed during the 17-18 pandemic. I have lived in a hotspot in Ontario during the entire pandemic. Not once has anyone asked me (as long as I was masked) if I had the right to be out and about. I think the only curfews imposed were in Quebec, and they're normally the most "human-rights-y" of provinces.
Click to expand...
No Quebec is not the most human rightsy of provinces. They are one of the most white supremasty of provinces. Just to clear that up. (Religious symbols, head scarves?)
Their home care facilities are abysmal - early on staff abandoned one and people died of neglect - for example. I wouldn't use Quebec as an example to make your point. I think Quebec politics and legal system is not human rightsy - at all - these days. It's corrupt. Just looking at political and legal decisions in that province in the past few years.
 
Ritafee said:
So those who are vulnerable to the 'disease' override those who are damaged by the 'experimental injections' then. If I am vulnerable to the 'disease' as modeling predicts I am ... I should support experimental procedures be imposed on the 'healthy' population to protect me from my own responsiblility? Responsibility to boost my own immune system through proper diet exercise and common sense ... as in if I am fearful of spreading or of getting the 'disease' ... I can modify my own behavior ... not everyone elses.
Click to expand...

Then make your own decisions and don't sermonize or cut and paste to others.
 
Kimmio Laughterlove said:
No Quebec is not the most human rightsy of provinces. They are one of the most white supremasty of provinces. Just to clear that up. (Religious symbols, head scarves?)
Their home care facilities are abysmal - early on staff abandoned one and people died of neglect - for example. I wouldn't use Quebec as an example to make your point. I think Quebec politics and legal system is not human rightsy - at all - these days. It's corrupt. Just looking at political and legal decisions in that province in the past few years.
Click to expand...
And Human Rights and Civil Liberties are not always the same. Human Rights comes first.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top