The Church Vs. The State Civil Disobedience

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Doesn't mean that being on the wrong side of one is better than the other.
Lack of transparency is not helpful when having to choose a side...

“But when you deprive the complainants of the ability to understand how (in this case Dr. Henry) got from A to B, the court can’t look at it, it really isn’t much of a review,” said B.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson. “It gives Dr. Henry absolute authority and if she chooses not to share her thought process with the court, there’s no oversight.”

The judge said the churches were entitled to know how the orders would allow someone to go into a bar and watch a hockey game for an hour or two but at the same time prevent someone from sitting in a church for the same amount of time.

“It is a point I’m struggling with,” he said. “Nobody elected Dr. Henry. She’s been appointed and she has a difficult job. But if you just take it on faith, that’s an ironic term to use. If you just take it on faith that she’s balancing all of these things.”

The judge noted that there was no affidavit filed by Henry.

“So how do I know what Dr. Henry is doing and why?” asked the judge.

 
Lack of transparency is not helpful when having to choose a side...

“But when you deprive the complainants of the ability to understand how (in this case Dr. Henry) got from A to B, the court can’t look at it, it really isn’t much of a review,” said B.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson. “It gives Dr. Henry absolute authority and if she chooses not to share her thought process with the court, there’s no oversight.”

The judge said the churches were entitled to know how the orders would allow someone to go into a bar and watch a hockey game for an hour or two but at the same time prevent someone from sitting in a church for the same amount of time.

“It is a point I’m struggling with,” he said. “Nobody elected Dr. Henry. She’s been appointed and she has a difficult job. But if you just take it on faith, that’s an ironic term to use. If you just take it on faith that she’s balancing all of these things.”

The judge noted that there was no affidavit filed by Henry.

“So how do I know what Dr. Henry is doing and why?” asked the judge.

They made their point. Henry should need to explain clearly why sports bars can be open but churches can't. It could be purely economics. It could end in them closing both, and shopping centres too, though - instead of more freedoms, less.


Is there a verdict? I missed something I think. I thought the trial was finished today.
 
They made their point. Henry should need to explain clearly why sports bars can be open but churches can't. It could be purely economics. It could end in them closing both, and shopping centres too, though - instead of more freedoms, less.
I don't think anyone has made this explicit yet. There has been some discussion about it in various communities of faith.

I suspect the primary issue is close contact.

Here at George Street, we worked out which pews are open and which are closed. This allows for individuals and families sharing a bubble to sit in the Sanctuary knowing that there will be 2m of space between their party and any other. We've been very explicit about that and we have created a dedicated team of ushers who disinfect the worship space and touchpoints before and after our face-to-face worship services.

Now that we are at a maximum of 5 for Faith Gatherings each participant disinfects their own area. The organist disinfects the organ. I disinfect the pulpit and our sound guy disinfects the soundboard.

Every now and then, while we worshipped at a maximum of 100, we had senior members lapse back into familiar patterns which meant that many members got into the bubbles of other members and it is that close contact that is what gives Public Health Authorities concern. We've had two funerals while in our pre-lockdown period between Christmas and the middle of February where members, not knowing what to say resorted to the familiar practice of hugging. Which drove our ushers nuts and would have made Public Health Authorities quite nervous.

The act of singing is also something that is discouraged. We have kept it but to do so we have insisted that folks who choose to sing must remain masked throughout the service.

I am the designated shopper for our family. I am not ever tempted to break out in song at Dominion or Kent. I don't hug others or get into their personal space. I am also in and out as quickly as possible. I cannot speak for what is going on in bars, most of us are closed at present so we have never run into the two-tier rules.

Right now with a maximum of 5 in our faith gatherings (Worship, weddings, funerals) that is 5 more people than can enter our local pubs. Our professional basketball and hockey teams belong to leagues that have suspended operations. Most are pointing to a local, high-school Volleyball tournament as being one location for the super spreading of the virus in our second wave.

If faith communities in NL are engaged in "whataboutism" with respect to grocery stores (which have clearly posted occupancy limits along with security at the front door keeping track) I haven't heard about it.
 
Having been in bars people tend to sit or stand close, touch a lot of surfaces, and there is often singing and shouting, hugging, hand shaking, sharing pub food etc. I think it's a relevant "whatabout". Not like others that are unrelated. The question as to why bars/ pubs are less dangerous gathering places than churches should be answered at least. And if neither are safer - close them both until enough people get vaccinated.
 
Last edited:
The question as to why bars/ pubs are less dangerous gathering places than churches should be answered at least. And if neither are safer - close them both until enough people get vaccinated.

I'm okay with the pubs that are more restaurant like. We don't eat out often and when we do, it's somewhere we trust. I would not go to any pub when it's later and more drinking focused right now. I also wouldn't go to church in person right now if they opened soon. I suppose I'm agreeing with you
 
Pandemic restrictions are not hierarchical. They apply to all humans, worldwide, in varying rotations. The virus can kill people of any status, but because of crowded working and living conditions and worse general health, poor people are more at risk. If you want to talk hierarchy...Kings and queens and presidents have been given the vaccine before most health care workers.
Our society is structured hierarchically. We are governed by law. To cross the line of that law is to invite repercussion. My primary examples are Jesus and Socrates. Each presented truth as action and each was rejected by the dominant powers. Each presented an egalitarian social order as the way forward in hope. Each gave their best in service to human well-being.
 
There has been some discussion about it in various communities of faith.

Public Statement - GraceLife Church of Edmonton Statement Excerpt ...

When COVID-19 first appeared, we shifted to livestream and abided by most of the new government guidelines for our gatherings. But when the first declared public health emergency ended, we opened our doors and returned to nearly normal gatherings on Sunday June 21st, 2020. We did so recognizing COVID-19 was much less severe than the government had initially projected. This sentiment was reflected in the assessment of the Premier of Alberta, who deliberately referred to COVID-19 as “influenza” multiple times in a speech announcing the end of the first declared public health emergency.

In early July, it was brought to our attention that two separate individuals had attended our gatherings on two consecutive Sundays and subsequently tested positive for the virus (both cases being unrelated to each other). At that time, we did our own internal contact tracing (prior to AHS notifying us of the exposure), many of our congregants were tested, and it was determined that no transmission of the virus had taken place. Out of an abundance of caution, we shifted exclusively to livestream and shutdown all other ministries for two weeks (14 days). We did this to mitigate any further spread of COVID-19. When it was evident that no further spread had taken place, we resumed our nearly normal gatherings. Since then, we have gathered as a church each Sunday without incident (28 Sundays to date).


Having engaged in an immense amount of research, interacting with both doctors and frontline healthcare workers, it is apparent that the negative effects of the government lockdown measures on society far surpass the effects of COVID-19. The science being used to justify lockdown measures is both suspect and selective. In fact, there is no empirical evidence that lockdowns are effective in mitigating the spread of the virus. We are gravely concerned that COVID-19 is being used to fundamentally alter society and strip us all of our civil liberties. By the time the so-called “pandemic” is over, if it is ever permitted to be over, Albertans will be utterly reliant on government, instead of free, prosperous, and independent.


As such, we believe love for our neighbor demands that we exercise our civil liberties. We do not see our actions as perpetuating the longevity of COVID-19 or any other virus that will inevitably come along. If anything, we see our actions as contributing to its end – the end of destructive lockdowns and the end of the attempt to institutionalize the debilitating fear of viral infections. Our local church is clear evidence that governmental lockdowns are unnecessary. In fact, it is also evidence of how harmful they are. Without going into detail, we recently lost the life of one of our precious congregants who was denied necessary health care due to government lockdown measures.
 
GraceLife associate pastor Jacob Spenst was at the pulpit in place of Coates for 2 Sundays in a row.

Up to seven vehicles containing police and health authorities patrolled the roads outside, collecting 'evidence? against the church'.

Churches across the prairies are opening their pews in solidarity with Coates. Fairview Baptist in Calgary, Heights Baptist in Medicine Hat and Fellowship Baptist in Saskatoon are risking expensive fines and closure notices in the face of lockdown restrictions.

At GraceLife on Feb 21 and Feb 28, while filled to capacity, no tickets were issued and police did not enter the property.
 
The decision on the bail hearing for Pastor James Coates was put over until Friday March 5 at 9:00 a.m.

The bail appeal for the imprisoned GraceLife Church pastor was heard in the Court of Queen's Bench in Edmonton.

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms lawyer James Kitchen, arguing on behalf of Pastor Coates, stressed that his continued imprisonment at the maximum security Remand Centre is an “embarrassment to the court.”

Pastor Coates has been held in the Remand Centre since February 16, unable to comply with bail conditions that would limit his ability to preach.

During the hearing, which was held over WebEx, the Crown prosecutor was identified as “Public Health Prosecutor” to protect her identity.

The Crown argued that releasing Pastor Coates without conditions on his ability to preach would call into question the reputation of the justice system. :LOL:

Is he a flight risk?

Is he a violent criminal?

If convicted of breaking the public health order would his sentence even warrant jail time?

A criminal charge of not complying with 'an undertaking' has been thrown in for good measure ... but he did not sign the undertaking in the first place ... so how can he have violated it?

So the secret "public health' Prosecutor Karen Thorsrud and Justice Peter Michalyshyn have determined that at the end of the day we have to keep this dangerous pastor in jail to avert the danger that he poses to the public ... but his church is still open and filled to capacity?

Justice Peter Michalyshyn of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in Edmonton has ruled that Pastor James Coates of Grace Life Church must remain in jail for the next eight weeks pending his trial, unless he agrees to abide by health orders that violates his Charter freedoms of conscience, religion, expression, association and peaceful assembly.





 
He is NOT 'unable.' He is unwilling.

Repeated for emphasis.

Some huge percentage of ministers across denominations have been willing to modify their interaction with their congregants in order to keep them as safe as possible during a global pandemic that affects those of church-going age, i.e. an older demographic, more than others. For some of them, this has required creativity, a learning curve with technology, increased time and energy, but they've been willing to do it. This clown hasn't, and now his congregation has no leader in position, which is unfortunate for them.
 
This clown hasn't, and now his congregation has no leader in position, which is unfortunate for them.
JACOB SPENST Associate Pastor has stepped in ... and the 'growing' congregation is still willing and able to make up their own minds ... they have decided amongst themselves to continue on in the same fashion they have for the 28 weeks before Pastor Coates decided that he was unable in good conscience to abide by unjustified restrictions. He willingly turned himself in to suffer the consequences ... of being unable to reconcile himself to going against his own conscience.
 
Back
Top