Ritafee
Is Being Human
The pastor was willing to go to jail ... I am not there yet.You seem to recognize what the pastor you support does not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The pastor was willing to go to jail ... I am not there yet.You seem to recognize what the pastor you support does not.
Lack of transparency is not helpful when having to choose a side...Doesn't mean that being on the wrong side of one is better than the other.
They made their point. Henry should need to explain clearly why sports bars can be open but churches can't. It could be purely economics. It could end in them closing both, and shopping centres too, though - instead of more freedoms, less.Lack of transparency is not helpful when having to choose a side...
“But when you deprive the complainants of the ability to understand how (in this case Dr. Henry) got from A to B, the court can’t look at it, it really isn’t much of a review,” said B.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson. “It gives Dr. Henry absolute authority and if she chooses not to share her thought process with the court, there’s no oversight.”
The judge said the churches were entitled to know how the orders would allow someone to go into a bar and watch a hockey game for an hour or two but at the same time prevent someone from sitting in a church for the same amount of time.
“It is a point I’m struggling with,” he said. “Nobody elected Dr. Henry. She’s been appointed and she has a difficult job. But if you just take it on faith, that’s an ironic term to use. If you just take it on faith that she’s balancing all of these things.”
The judge noted that there was no affidavit filed by Henry.
“So how do I know what Dr. Henry is doing and why?” asked the judge.
![]()
Judge grills lawyer about Dr. Henry not providing affidavit in COVID-19 church case
Dr. Henry and the province have said they are confident the health orders are in accordance with the law.vancouversun.com
I don't think anyone has made this explicit yet. There has been some discussion about it in various communities of faith.They made their point. Henry should need to explain clearly why sports bars can be open but churches can't. It could be purely economics. It could end in them closing both, and shopping centres too, though - instead of more freedoms, less.
The question as to why bars/ pubs are less dangerous gathering places than churches should be answered at least. And if neither are safer - close them both until enough people get vaccinated.
Our society is structured hierarchically. We are governed by law. To cross the line of that law is to invite repercussion. My primary examples are Jesus and Socrates. Each presented truth as action and each was rejected by the dominant powers. Each presented an egalitarian social order as the way forward in hope. Each gave their best in service to human well-being.Pandemic restrictions are not hierarchical. They apply to all humans, worldwide, in varying rotations. The virus can kill people of any status, but because of crowded working and living conditions and worse general health, poor people are more at risk. If you want to talk hierarchy...Kings and queens and presidents have been given the vaccine before most health care workers.
And each were misrepresented by the media.Each presented truth as action and each was rejected by the dominant powers
And that is your priviledge. Keeping other people from attending is not.I also wouldn't go to church in person right now if they opened soon.
There has been some discussion about it in various communities of faith.
Public Statement - GraceLife Church of Edmonton Statement Excerpt ...
When COVID-19 first appeared, we shifted to livestream and abided by most of the new government guidelines for our gatherings. But when the first declared public health emergency ended, we opened our doors and returned to nearly normal gatherings on Sunday June 21st, 2020. We did so recognizing COVID-19 was much less severe than the government had initially projected. This sentiment was reflected in the assessment of the Premier of Alberta, who deliberately referred to COVID-19 as “influenza” multiple times in a speech announcing the end of the first declared public health emergency.
In early July, it was brought to our attention that two separate individuals had attended our gatherings on two consecutive Sundays and subsequently tested positive for the virus (both cases being unrelated to each other). At that time, we did our own internal contact tracing (prior to AHS notifying us of the exposure), many of our congregants were tested, and it was determined that no transmission of the virus had taken place. Out of an abundance of caution, we shifted exclusively to livestream and shutdown all other ministries for two weeks (14 days). We did this to mitigate any further spread of COVID-19. When it was evident that no further spread had taken place, we resumed our nearly normal gatherings. Since then, we have gathered as a church each Sunday without incident (28 Sundays to date).
Having engaged in an immense amount of research, interacting with both doctors and frontline healthcare workers, it is apparent that the negative effects of the government lockdown measures on society far surpass the effects of COVID-19. The science being used to justify lockdown measures is both suspect and selective. In fact, there is no empirical evidence that lockdowns are effective in mitigating the spread of the virus. We are gravely concerned that COVID-19 is being used to fundamentally alter society and strip us all of our civil liberties. By the time the so-called “pandemic” is over, if it is ever permitted to be over, Albertans will be utterly reliant on government, instead of free, prosperous, and independent.
As such, we believe love for our neighbor demands that we exercise our civil liberties. We do not see our actions as perpetuating the longevity of COVID-19 or any other virus that will inevitably come along. If anything, we see our actions as contributing to its end – the end of destructive lockdowns and the end of the attempt to institutionalize the debilitating fear of viral infections. Our local church is clear evidence that governmental lockdowns are unnecessary. In fact, it is also evidence of how harmful they are. Without going into detail, we recently lost the life of one of our precious congregants who was denied necessary health care due to government lockdown measures.
He is NOT 'unable.' He is unwilling. Huge difference.Pastor Coates has been held in the Remand Centre since February 16, unable to comply with bail conditions that would limit his ability to preach.
He is NOT 'unable.' He is unwilling.
This clown hasn't, and now his congregation has no leader in position, which is unfortunate for them.