Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The writer is scared. As church attendance dwindles, you'll see more and more of this lashing out at the SBNR, atheists, UUs, liberal Christians, etc. It doesn't interest her? When is the last time a columnist wrote so passionately about something that didn't interest her? It interests her a lot. It probably scares her, as a pastor.
SBNR isn't challenging? In what way? I agree that belief is challenging, because I find it impossible to believe. To me, religious belief is completely unbelievable, and I would literally need to be medicated to believe, because otherwise it doesn't pass my internal bulls**t filters.
If "challenging" beliefs are the goal, then astrology must be pretty awesome to her. Does she know about homeopathy? Alien abductions?
People want to maintain a sense of wonder, and they don't want to call themselves "atheists" because that term has negative connotations. So people go with SBNR. I think that's fine. The important thing, is they aren't being instructed by 2000 year old myths. They have to think for themselves and run into challenges for which there are no pat answers, pretty much every day. That's the good sort of challenge. Struggling to believe or live up to some ancient con man's version of how you should live in a modern world isn't a challenge - it's stupid.
If you're analyzing the bible and you're rejecting parts of it, then my post isn't addressing you or your beliefs as "stupid".Chansen...I respect your beliefs. However, I have different beliefs and I don't believe they are stupid. There are no pat answers in my faith. And I have plenty of chance to think for myself. That 'ancient con man' does say some things in the Bible that I have a hard time adhering to, but I remember that his ideas were written down by others long after he was around and in a specific political/religious/social climate. My personal spirituality accepts a lot of the wonders that non-religious spiritual people see, but it includes a faith in God. Not a perfect faith. Not a faith that makes me a perfect person. But a faith that enriches my life and guides me to be a more giving and generous person than I might otherwise be.
I would say that the UU are not religious but some of them are very spiritual.
One person that I can think of who is not religious but is the most spiritual person I know - Carolyn McDade.
Its been years since I did a lot of travel, and then it was mostly by train. You sit down next to somebody, or they sit next to you. You exchange a few words. 'Nice day.' Then you either talk or not. If you're not in the mood for conversation, you pick up a magazine, or turn your head and look out the window, or close your eyes and pretend to rest a moment.
But if you both are ready for some light conversation, you try to find something in common. "What do you do?" "I'm a pastor."
What next? The person feels some response is appropriate, but they don't really want to go deep or be offensive so they say something about being spiritual but not religious.
Fine. The pastor can turn the conversation around - "What do you do?" "I'm a scientist. Right now I'm working on disease prevention in potatoes." "Fascinating - tell me about it."
Or they can stop the conversation by (a) pretending to sleep (b) starting their prayers (c) pulling out dozens of pictures of their children (this doesn't work with little old ladies who also have dozens of pictures of their grandchildren.) But it gets the conversation away from religion.
I see nothing wrong with being spiritual without "religion". It doesn't mean to me that you abandon God, just that you abandon some construct that may limit ones spiritual nature. I personally choose the church to encourage that pursuit, others may not, but eventually I think we all seek fellowship in some form or another because even our spirituality on it's own builds constructs of how we view God. We don't sit in front of a cross believing it's God, it has meaning. I can still sit quietly and see the sun set and not see the sun as God, but I can definitely see His majesty.
What if the atmosphere they've experienced at church is overwhelmingly negative? We've heard here about churches which are judgmental and borderline abusive in their treatment of some members. What if you believe, but just have no viable, welcoming church near you?
chansen said:I think the answer is, you stop going. The negative side of that, I think, is the potential to be taken in by extremist televangelists who have a wide media reach, as airclean33 and unsafe show us weekly. But I can see why some people choose not to attend.
It could also be that there is nothing wrong with the people there, no hard feelings, but the style of worship, the activities, just don't fit for a person. Eg. "Scum of the Earth Church" (a real church - they're being ironic - it's a church for younger hipsters and people into "grunge" music, etc. but also very interested in living the Gospel and serving their community) vs. high Anglican. There may just not be much choice.
Thank you Hermann ... a like from you is an affirmation for me that I am moving in the right direction.