Snoopy Approaches Acts

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Status
Not open for further replies.
Acts 18:12-17
www.biblegateway.com

Bible Gateway passage: Acts 18:12-17 - New English Translation

Paul Before the Proconsul Gallio - Now while Gallio was proconsul of Achaia, the Jews attacked Paul together and brought him before the judgment seat, saying, “This man is persuading people to worship God in a way contrary to the law!” But just as Paul was about to speak, Gallio said to the...
www.biblegateway.com www.biblegateway.com
While Gallio is proconsul of Achaia, Paul is brought to the judgment seat by the Jews. They accuse him of persuading people to worship God in ways that are outside the law.

But Gallio tells the Jews they must settle this matter among themselves. He refuses to judge and has them forced away from the judgment seat.

The Jews seize Sosthenes, the president of the synagogue, and proceed to beat him. This is of no concern to Gallio.
 
The study notes tell us this incident has a clear timeframe because Gallio was proconsul from 51-52 AD.

The matter of dispute concerns the Gentiles and Mosaic law, including circumcision. Luke, the notes say, places the disagreements between Jews and early Christians still within Judaism.

The Roman officials are disinterested in these internal matters.

If the crucifixion took place in 30 AD or 33 AD, approximately two decades have passed. The original disciples are approaching middle age as these events unfold.
 
Today we meet a man named Gallio who was the governor of Achaia ----

The Jews involve Gallio in their Dispute with Paul and brought him to Gallio to be judged for trying to persuade them to worship God which they regarded as a violation against the Mosaic Law -----

So who was this man Gallio

Topical Encyclopedia
Gallio, a notable figure in the New Testament, is best known for his role as the proconsul of Achaia during the Apostle Paul's second missionary journey. His encounter with Paul is recorded in the Book of Acts, specifically in Acts 18:12-17. Gallio's full name was Lucius Junius Gallio Annaeanus, and he was the elder brother of the famous Stoic philosopher Seneca. His tenure as proconsul is generally dated around AD 51-52.

I say ------ Paul was about to reply but Gallio spoke up and refused to be involved as he clearly pointed out that this was none of his affair ----as this involved the Jewish Religion and was their own personal matter ----and he washed his hands of the matter -----Saving Paul from any harm

Now Remember what God told Paul in his vision ----Don't be afraid as God was with him and no harm would come to him ----just keep preaching the Gospel ----

if Gallio have of gotten involved --Paul's preaching would have been severely hindered ----but that was not in God's Plan ----God's Plan was to have His Word preached without disruptions --

My view here -------The poor Jews who are constantly plotting to kill Paul and stop the Gospel from being preached must be getting tired of constantly loosing their battle to silence God ---nothing they try works ----

So we see that the Gentiles then go after Sosthenes, the Jewish leader of the synagogue,and beat him in front of the judgment seat ----but Gallio pays not attention to this at all -----

This is a footnote from the AMP B

Acts 18:17 As leader of the synagogue Sosthenes would have presented the charges against Paul. Apparently something related to this made him the target of the attack. If this Sosthenes is the same man mentioned in 1 Cor 1:1, he later became a believer and follower of Christ.


So we see that God is Faithful in doing what He says He will do -----which was protecting Paul from harm so the Gospel can be preached -----

God never changes Folks ---God will protect His Faithful Children from harm today as well ----

Powerful Scripture here for His Children today -----Blows my mind that People would reject this promise ---the HE WILL ---is a Promise ---

  • Psalm 91:3-4 (NLT):
    "He will rescue     you from every trap and protect you from deadly disease. He will cover you with his feathers. He will shelter you with his wings. His faithful promises are your armor and protection".
 
@unsafe from my reading of the text, I would say it was the Jews who went after Sosthenes, the leader of the synagogue. Not the Gentiles.
 
paradox3 said:
@unsafe from my reading of the text, I would say it was the Jews who went after Sosthenes, the leader of the synagogue. Not the Gentiles.
Click to expand...
I think if you do some research you will find that it was the Greeks ----who went after the Sosthenes -----as the Greeks were really upset at the Jews for bringing on a disturbance and it was for nothing as no judgment took place ---so they went after the Jewish leader of the Synagogue and beat him --making an example of him ------

 
Here is Acts 18:17 in multiple translations.
www.biblegateway.com

Acts 18:17 - Bible Gateway

www.biblegateway.com www.biblegateway.com

I might have misread the NET text because it says "they all seized Sosthenes". I took this to be the Jews but I guess not.

Other versions say "the Greeks" or the "the crowds". The crowds could include everyone, perhaps?

So interesting. Thanks for the conversation @unsafe.
 
paradox3 said:
Here is Acts 18:17 in multiple translations.
www.biblegateway.com

Acts 18:17 - Bible Gateway

www.biblegateway.com www.biblegateway.com

I might have misread the NET text because it says "they all seized Sosthenes". I took this to be the Jews but I guess not.

Other versions say "the Greeks" or the "the crowds". The crowds could include everyone, perhaps?

So interesting. Thanks for the conversation @unsafe.
Click to expand...
One of those cases when not all the manuscripts agree, which highlights the challenges of interpretation/translation.

From what I remember in my seminary discussions one of the principles used to determine what might be the earlier or original reading is which is clearer. Seldom is something emended over time to make it less clear. SO using that principle it would seem that the passage origingally said "they" but was later emended to specify "the Greeks" for some reason (could be clarity, could be something more polemical)
 
GordW said:
One of those cases when not all the manuscripts agree, which highlights the challenges of interpretation/translation.
Click to expand...
You mean there isn't a single, perfect Bible out there? Shocking. Absolutely shocking. :D

If it makes you feel better, a lot of other texts, some even more recent, have the same problem.

To be honest, Gallio acted rightly in Paul's case. His job was judge Roman law, not Jewish law. The beating of the synagogue president is rather disturbing, though, and Gallio is being a bit of a prick in not calling on his men to break that up.

There's a nice footnote there about Gallio. He was the brother of the famed philosopher Seneca, who was Nero's teacher until he fell afoul of the emperor and was ordered to commit suicide. Cool that this event is actually datable given Gallio's involvement.
 
paradox3 said:
Other versions say "the Greeks" or the "the crowds". The crowds could include everyone, perhaps?
Click to expand...
My Spiritual thoughts on this ----

Perhaps yes the crowd could have included everyone --but why would the Jews beat one of their own especially the Leader of their Synagogue ----that just makes no sense to me ----

Now there is a debate among some Scholars that the Jews were among the Crowd ------

The reasoning for this is that maybe the Jews were upset because their leader didn't convince the Governor that Paul needed Judgment -------and so they beat him -----

it mentions no leader that brought Paul up or spoke up ----it just says the Jews brought Paul before the judgment seat -----

So it says nothing about the Sosthenes being involved in the bringing of Paul to be judged ---the Sosthenes is not mentioned until the beating happens ------

this is the Scripture ---
the Jews made a united attack on Paul and brought him before the judgment seat

So would you would think that -----if the leader of the synagogue was one of the Jews --this person would have been mentioned as one of the Jews who brought Paul forward ---and was the one spokes person for the Jews to get Paul Judged ------as the name was important enough to be mentioned in the beating --so why would it be not mentioned in the bringing of Paul for Judgment ?????

It just makes Spiritual sense that the Greeks would make an example of the Sosthenes to show their anger at the Jews for their wrongful Judgment of Paul -----and causing a fuss for nothing ------
 
We can only speculate because we don't know anything about Sosthenes' take on Gentile believers and the Law.

Earlier in Acts we saw crowds of rabble rousers making trouble for no particular reason. They were quite easily led.

These crowds might be the same.
 
This is from
AI
Regardless of the textual variant, the central event is that Sosthenes was beaten, and Gallio did not intervene.

If it was the Jews: This theory suggests the Jews were so frustrated by Gallio’s dismissal of their case that they turned their rage on their own synagogue leader, Sosthenes. This could be because he failed to successfully prosecute Paul

If it was the Greeks: This view suggests the non-Jewish crowd, annoyed by the Jewish protestors disrupting the court, took matters into their own hands. They attacked Sosthenes, the leader of the group causing the disturbance, right in front of Gallio as a way of demonstrating their own frustration.
 
Both of which make sense in the circumstances. The real issue is Gallio not intervening but given he was probably a bit pissed off by the whole thing already, maybe he decided to let things take their course instead of getting involved further.
 
GordW said:
One of those cases when not all the manuscripts agree, which highlights the challenges of interpretation/translation.
Click to expand...
I agree with GordW here for sure ---

But here is the thing with Born Again people they have an advantage of having a Spiritual helper who is God ---who dwells in them -----and who if relied on can help tremendously in filling in the blanks of what may seem very confusing and challenging to the intellectual mind when it comes to Scripture ----
 
Gallio saw the dispute as an internal matter that didn't concern him. It doesn't surprise me that he declined to stop the beating of Sosthenes. The matter at hand was related to Jewish Law, not Roman Law.

It seems possible that the Greek crowds joined in but I still think the Jews must have been the initiators.

We know that the Jews had internal tension related to the Gentiles who were joining them. Did they, or did they not, need to observe the Jewish Law, including circumcision?

I read somewhere (Jewish point of view) that it look longer than we think for Christianity and rabbinic Judaism to become distinct. It was well after the destruction of the temple, this argument went.
 
Acts 18:18-23
www.biblegateway.com

Bible Gateway passage: Acts 18:18-23 - New English Translation

Paul Returns to Antioch in Syria - Paul, after staying many more days in Corinth, said farewell to the brothers and sailed away to Syria accompanied by Priscilla and Aquila. He had his hair cut off at Cenchrea because he had made a vow. When they reached Ephesus, Paul left Priscilla and Aquila...
www.biblegateway.com www.biblegateway.com
After many days, Paul sails to Syria accompanied by Priscilla and Aquila.

He has his hair cut off at Cenchrea because he had made a vow.

He leaves his two companions in Ephesus and sails to Caesarea. He greets the church in Jerusalem and spends time in Antioch. He goes through Galatia and Phrygia, strengthening all the disciples
 
A short, rather dry reading today. We see Paul continuing his travels and his mission.

What do we make of the haircut?

Was it, in fact, Paul who got his hair cut off? The NET study notes suggest it might have been Aquila.
 
Another idea is that Paul took the Nazirite vow as described in Numbers.

For a period of time (not necessarily permanently) a Nazirite would let their hair grow, abstain from wine and refrain from touching a dead body.

At the end of the period of consecration, the head would be shaved and sacrifices offered in the temple.

Some speculate that John the Baptist might have been a Nazirite.
 
So we see that Paul is ending his second missionary journey-----

and Notice He stayed for a while longer -----so this is good news here cause this means he wasn't leaving because he was forced to flee because people were going to kill him ---he was leaving on his own power ---

He sailed to Syria with Priscilla and Aquila -----we see here at in------ Cenchrea [the southeastern port of Corinth] he had his hair cut, because he was keeping a [Nazirite] vow [of abstention].

The vow he was fulfilling was in Numbers 6:18 ---where he was to grow his hair long and at the end of the vow cut the hair off ----it was a dedication made to God -----

AI says this ----
Why Paul Took the Vow

  • Showing Respect for the Law:Some scholars suggest Paul took this vow to demonstrate his continued respect for the Jewish Law to a Jewish audience, even while ministering to Gentiles.
  • A Personal Consecration:It could also have been a personal act of consecration, a temporary period of special devotion to God, similar to the spirit of the Nazirite vow.


The Nazirite Vow represents a profound commitment to God, symbolizing purity, devotion, and separation from worldly influences. It serves as a reminder of the call to holiness and the importance of dedicating one's life to the service of the Lord. The vow's requirements highlight the significance of self-discipline and the willingness to forgo personal comforts for the sake of spiritual growth and dedication.

So Paul and the others arrive in Ephesus, and he left the others there; but he entered the synagogue and reasoned and debated with the Jews.

Now remember this place was the place where the Holy Spirit has blocked Paul from preaching there earlier in Acts 16 ---but now was given the OK by the Holy Spirit to preach there -----and he had great success ------

Paul was asked yo stay longer ---but he refused and told them he hoped that if it be God's Will he would return -----

I say -------So what we see here is that God has a Right time for things to happen ---when True Christians are told to Wait by the Holy Spirit they need to adhere to that --as the Holy spirit knows what lies ahead --- we do not ----when we ignore that prompting by the Holy Spirit disaster will happen -----

Learning this comes by way of Maturing in Christ -----

When Paul landed at Caesarea, he went up and greeted the church [at Jerusalem], and then went down to Antioch.

So Paul spends some time in Antioch and then heads off again on his next mission ---

Verse 23 -------he left and traveled through the territory of Galatia and Phrygia, strengthening and encouraging all the disciples.

Paul seems to have a passion for making sure the Disciples are well encouraged and are strong in Christ's faith to do their jobs of prospering God's Kingdom ---

Today it remains a big challenge to be a Disciple and add to God's Kingdom -----

This world is so divided and so angry at one another for their different views on God and His Kingdom that peace is very far off ---you see it so great in the USA ---so violent --so ant-God --I am sure it is the same here in Canada and all over ----but thank God ---God has a Plan to end it all in the future ---and I don't think that Plan is far off as you see what is happening in this world ------Just my view ----
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top