Random thoughts about whatever

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

The object rejects the Enigma (it knows who it is) unless it apologizes and changes its MO. The object suspects that it might never understand its own folly. As such, it’ll stay rejected as if it doesn’t exist.

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

Seeing as the Enigma and the object share a host here, the object cannot tolerate the Enigma’s presence in the same room even if hidden, after realizing what it does and how horrible and hurtful that is. It can’t help because its MO is too harmful to bring good. So the object has to leave the room again by her own choice. The heartless Enigma can stay and waste its own time talking to itself, bringing itself down, even though it should probably put its time into its own family at this stage of its own life - and into doing no more harm. The object does not belong to the Enigma. The object is not an object, she’s a person.

(Advice: Don’t let it in. It has alterior motives that might hurt you.)

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

The blob is a hard teacher. The past decade or so has been awful. We didn’t need that. We don’t need that. We need a new vibe. Who’s with me?

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

Was what you’ve done always kind, and just, and truly humble? Were the emotional flares there, but only visible to those looking closely in trying to commune, like a white/blue flame? They don’t know ahead of time that someday they might be burned by how your buried emotions manifest. I saw the flares occasionally. Why are you so certain you’re entitled to lecture and judge? Is your prerogative righteous and everybody else’s a mistake? At least they were being real. And over time, opinions can change, beliefs change, things are learned and unlearned, some things people value don’t change, some bridges get repaired, some damaged, then repaired again. People forgive and make up. Sometimes they don’t. But this crowd has generally tried to do that. Do you just hide behind the obscured nature of your communication which makes actual mutual sharing difficult? People have defended your right to do that. I used to, too. Some actually have let themselves trust and have shared more than you have, of their real selves, flawed or not. Why should anybody trust you, though, after you abuse that trust to hand them pain, and blame them for not knowing better after they’ve received pain from you? Do you see the problem there? (No? Didn’t do that?)

Have you ever typed your handle and wondercafe2.ca into Ai? I did once after seeing all the bots and wondering what would be summarized. You appear to be quite a celebrity.

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

Give the mysticism a rest. Reexamine. This form only confuses and causes disagreement about interpretation and intent. It’s misleading. Just people forgiving and moving forward caring about other people is what’s needed.

For the real world, mysticism can become pretentious, arbitrary, overly controlling, spiritually abusive. The spirit to treat people better comes from within. If dark mysticism is interfering with that, by confusion and manipulation, stirring up fear and anger and misunderstanding, people can’t heal. In human relationship terms, making it more complex only creates more problems. And we are human beings. If we are to be “mystics” love has to be the primary ingredient. For the real world, we basically need humanism with vision.

That’s clear.

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

That’s not to say we can’t honour symbolic traditions but we need to put love for others first to have a better, less conflicted real world.

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

We do need to try to be better than our dark sides (recognize that monster but keep it on a leash) or there won’t be a habitable future. It’ll be nothing but brutal unless we can pivot. Ren made a point only, as art, but the sides don’t deserve equal weight unless you’re part of the entity who wants the world to end. It’s a dark blob. That means the “devil” and the dark mystics and sorcerers and the extreme atheists and the Nazis, and the extreme religious fundamentalists (false “light”). On the borderline are people who don’t even think about it at all because they’re busy being busy (they have potential to change what keeps them busy though. They’re just scared in a lot of cases and the dark side doesn’t help because it doesn’t want a collective effort to save the world). That’s the dark(ish) side. Who knew? (Pretty sure I already did a while ago even before I was “otherwise occupied” with nonsense. So perhaps that’s why the nonsense.)

That’s my deep thought for today.

We’re human beings. Start caring about that.

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

Everybody are human beings - dark side too. If we want the real world to go on though, we have to get more humanist.

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

The dark side - with or without “mysticism”, it’s about cruelty and manipulation, and dehumanization.

It’s not about the symbols or the dress code or the type of art or music or food it’s the goals of the entity we support (knowingly or not). Are we supporting the Blob or something that contributes to saving the real world?