Novel Coronavirus

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Does WC2 now need to spread misinformation that even youtube takes off because it is so wrong?
So there is information that is wrong according to WC2 censoring? If youtube takes it down then WC2 must censor it as well. Carolla posted an article by a commercial blogger and In her opinion it was worth reading. That was a good qualification ... In her opinion. In my opinion ... I do not consent to the official narrative being the only narrative ... many people do not consent to the current protocol of the lockdown. I am one of them. In my opinion if you tube takes it down it is worthy of a second look. I did not tell anyone that they had to go and look at the material on the alternative uncensored site. I just provided the alternative site in case @Kimmio Laughterlove was actually interested in the video as still viewable. In your opinion the information is wrong but you probably have not viewed it to be able to make that call for yourself. I have read the article that Carolla provided and I have watched the video in question. That is being open minded. Neither source should have to be censored.
 
They are not "scientists", per say. They are not trained researchers of epidemiology. One is an MD one is an osteopath. Their numbers are skewed and they're out of their depth...and they are promoting their medical "business".
 
You're not the only one who thinks so! Rev Cameron Trimble (from Atlanta) wrote this - which sums it up pretty well I think! :ROFLMAO:

Advisory​
Please read and follow these simple rules:​
1. Basically, you can't leave the house for any reason, but if you have to, then you can.​
2. Masks are useless, but maybe you have to wear one, it can save you, it is useless, but maybe it is mandatory as well.​
3. Stores are closed, except those that are open.​
4. You should not go to hospitals unless you have to go there. Same applies to doctors, you should only go there in case of emergency, provided you are not too sick.​
5. This virus is deadly but still not too scary, except that sometimes it actually leads to a global disaster.​
6. Gloves won't help, but they can still help.​
7. Everyone needs to stay HOME, but it's important to GO OUT.​
8. There is no shortage of groceries in the supermarket, but there are many things missing when you go there in the evening, but not in the morning. Sometimes.​
9. The virus has no effect on children except those it affects.​
10. Animals are not affected, but there is still a cat that tested positive in Belgium in February when no one had been tested, plus a few tigers here and there…​
11. You will have many symptoms when you are sick, but you can also get sick without symptoms, have symptoms without being sick, or be contagious without having symptoms. Oh, my..​
12. In order not to get sick, you have to eat well and exercise, but eat whatever you have on hand and it's better not to go out, well, but no…​
13. It's better to get some fresh air, but you get looked at very wrong when you get some fresh air, and most importantly, you don't go to parks or walk. But don’t sit down, except that you can do that now if you are old, but not for too long or if you are pregnant (but not too old).​
14. You can't go to retirement homes, but you have to take care of the elderly and bring food and medication.​
15. If you are sick, you can't go out, but you can go to the pharmacy.​
16. You can get restaurant food delivered to the house, which may have been prepared by people who didn't wear masks or gloves. But you have to have your groceries decontaminated outside for 3 hours. Pizza too?​
17. Every disturbing article or disturbing interview starts with " I don't want to trigger panic, but…"​
18. You can't see your older mother or grandmother, but you can take a taxi and meet an older taxi driver.​
19. You can walk around with a friend but not with your family if they don't live under the same roof.​
20. You are safe if you maintain the appropriate social distance, but you can’t go out with friends or strangers at the safe social distance.​
21. The virus remains active on different surfaces for two hours, no, four, no, six, no, we didn't say hours, maybe days? But it takes a damp environment. Oh no, not necessarily.​
22. The virus stays in the air - well no, or yes, maybe, especially in a closed room, in one hour a sick person can infect ten, so if it falls, all our children were already infected at school before it was closed. But remember, if you stay at the recommended social distance, however in certain circumstances you should maintain a greater distance, which, studies show, the virus can travel further, maybe.​
23. We count the number of deaths but we don't know how many people are infected as we have only tested so far those who were "almost dead" to find out if that's what they will die of…​
24. We have no treatment, except that there may be one that apparently is not dangerous unless you take too much (which is the case with all medications).​
25. We should stay locked up until the virus disappears, but it will only disappear if we achieve collective immunity, so when it circulates… but we must no longer be locked up for that?​
https://youtu.be/wVs5AyjzwRM
I think everyone will enjoy this video, except those that don’t enjoy it.
 
They are not "scientists", per say. They are not trained researchers of epidemiology. One is an MD one is an osteopath. Their numbers are skewed and they're out of their depth...and they are promoting their medical "business".
Bill Gates is not a Medical or Science Expert ... he is promoting his 'business' ... why is he not censored?
 
All I can tell you is that the situation looks different in different places due to different social and economic and political factors. NYC has it much worse than where I live, for example. That doesn't mean the virus is not real and not dangerous - because they have no vaccine we have to physical distance so as not to have a spike in cases too soon. It sucks but there are sound reasons for it.

Some of the measures in some places are too severe for their circumstances. Others have been too lax too soon, and that could be a big mistake.
 
Carolla posted an article by a commercial blogger and In her opinion it was worth reading.

I posted the article. The blogger was a person with a background that gave him a platform to critique information presented in another place. People can use stats to back up their perspectives, both good and bad. This blogger challenged the skewed way the pair presented "stats" to back their claims. If Bill Gates were to critique information, that would be okay. He's someone who has done a lot of research and has an informed, researched opinion. His voice has as much value as anyone's.
 
So the science has been settled then. Every scientist agrees with every other scientist ... there is no debate?
There is certainly debate and if we compare what was said one month ago there are major differences of understanding this virus.
Right now there's a debate about whether the virus is also airborne.
 
I don't really trust Gates...he has too much power. I trust Bonnie Henry though.

We don't have to trust him or anyone absolutely. I've heard him interviewed recently. He has some interesting perspective. It's one perspective in a chorus of views. I would not want him involved in policy. I'm glad Dr Henry is involved in policy.
 
I posted the article. The blogger was a person with a background that gave him a platform to critique information presented in another place. People can use stats to back up their perspectives, both good and bad. This blogger challenged the skewed way the pair presented "stats" to back their claims.

Carolla reposted it and agreed with you that It was an excellent article. That is what I responded to. My point being that neither perspective was without bias.
If Bill Gates were to critique information, that would be okay. He's someone who has done a lot of research and has an informed, researched opinion. His voice has as much value as anyone's.
But WHO is calling the shots?
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the largest non-state funder of the WHO, having donated more than $2B in earmarked grants to the international health agency since 1998, and is the second largest WHO funder overall (after the U.S. government). Because Gates Foundation grant money is earmarked for specific programs, such as vaccine purchase, delivery and promotion, the Gates Foundation significantly influences the setting of WHO’s program priorities.
We don't have to trust him or anyone absolutely. I've heard him interviewed recently. He has some interesting perspective. It's one perspective in a chorus of views. I would not want him involved in policy.
Whether you want it or not ... Bill and Melinda are calling the shots.
 
I suggest that we voluntarily consent to respecting each others 'opinions' however they were informed without compulsion to mandatory enforcement and censorship.
 
I suggest that we voluntarily consent to respecting each others 'opinions' however they were informed without compulsion to mandatory enforcement and censorship.

Does that include not dismissing people or blogs outright because they don't fit with your narrative?
 
Back
Top